by JanieM
My first front-page post here at ObWi was about cemeteries. In it I mentioned my dilemma: do I want to be buried? (If so, how and where?) Cremated? I wasn’t sure then and I’m not sure now, but I will soon have an option that wasn’t available in February of 2017.
Today was the annual meeting and picnic of the land trust I belong to, at which it was formally announced that we’re planning to buy a piece of land to turn into a conservation burial ground. One of my friends and I are already looking ahead to the trouble we’re going to cause once we take up residence there, whether along the lines of Spoon River Anthology or Lincoln in the Bardo we’re not yet sure.
To quote from the brochure:
As defined by the Green Burial Council, conservation burial takes place in a natural, conserved area of ten acres or more and uses only natural, biodegradable burial materials. Green burial also uses only natural materials, but is not defined as taking place in a broader conservation area. In contrast, most modern burial methods use deforested landscapes, toxic embalming fluids, cement vaults, and treated non-native wood, all of which are detrimental to the local environment, water quality, and worker health.
The burial ground the land trust is planning will be, like our other properties, open to the public for hiking, bird-watching, and generally enjoying the outdoors. It will also be the first of our conserved lands to have ADA-accessible trails.
At the moment I don’t have any thoughts, profound or otherwise, to add to my last post on the subject, but here are a couple of relevant book recommendations:
Being Mortal, by Atul Gawande. Gawande, for those who may not have run across him, is a Boston surgeon who also writes books and New Yorker articles. He’s the son of surgeons – who were also immigrants, those pesky people who will insist on coming to this country and not sponging off the rest of us.
Being Mortal combines family stories with information about the intersection of end-of-life issues with the practice of modern medicine and with end-of-life care generally in the U.S. It’s wonderfully written and very thought-provoking.
Also, Advice for Future Corpses (and Those Who Love Them): A Practical Perspective on Death and Dying, by Sallie Tisdale. It’s a very different kind of book from Gawande’s, written by a nurse (and writer) who has worked in palliative care settings and who is also a Buddhist, with her own particular perspective on death and dying.
I'd heard of Spoon River Anthology, but had no idea what it was. I checked your link, and like the look of it - it's on the list! Thanks Janie.
Posted by: Girl from the North Country | August 20, 2018 at 08:45 AM
An interesting idea. I've always assumed that I would stick with the family tradition of cremation. (We have all the cited issues with traditional burials. And no interest in visiting grave sites.)
I'll have to look around here. See if it's on offer, which I suspect it will be. And what the costs are.
Posted by: wj | August 20, 2018 at 11:13 AM
Spoon River Anthology is one of the glories of American literature.
Pay close attention to Elsa Wertman and Hamilton Greene.
I particularly love Lucinda Matlock, and I re-read Carl Hamblin every May 1. I've probably put it up on the comments on ObWi at least once.
But for funerary poems, I like :
Posted by: joel hanes | August 20, 2018 at 11:44 AM
Very beautiful, joel hanes, except for "Or places upon my body" which I have now ascertained (with relief) is a typo for "Nor place upon my body". Like Spoon River Anthology, I remember vaguely hearing about the Fugs, but knew nothing. This is an incentive to know more.
Posted by: Girl from the North Country | August 20, 2018 at 12:06 PM
You know, I've had that file on my computer for over twenty years, re-read it occasionally, and have never caught that typo. Thanks. I'll fix my file.
If a front-pager could fix it in the comment above, I'd be much obliged.
Posted by: joel hanes | August 20, 2018 at 12:24 PM
Thanks to AbeBooks, Spoon River Anthology is on its way. I will pay the particular attention you suggest, joel hanes, since my impression from past discussions is that your recommendations are well worth following.
Posted by: Girl from the North Country | August 20, 2018 at 12:30 PM
Typo fixed. :-)
Posted by: JanieM | August 20, 2018 at 12:32 PM
That old "body launched on a boat set aflame" thing is too old fashioned.
I think "encased in a giant asteroid, launched at the GOPHQ at 100km/s" is better.
There will be no survivors. Valhalla or bust!
Posted by: Snarki, child of Loki | August 20, 2018 at 01:14 PM
cremation for my wife and I, then internment of our ashes at Mt Auburn cemetery in Cambridge MA.
getting our spots there was the first "things couples do together" thing we did together.
Posted by: russell | August 20, 2018 at 01:27 PM
when i die, i'd like to be brought back to life.
anything else will be wasted on me.
Posted by: cleek | August 20, 2018 at 01:43 PM
My best friend used to say he wanted his body dumped in the woods to be fed on by scavengers. I think he was trying to defy convention more than anything, but it turns out possibly to be an environmentally friendly plan.
The idea of dumping human bodies in the wilderness seems like polluting to me, but large mammals die there all the time, and it's not like there are stinky corpses everywhere. The clean-up crews are pretty efficient. (Josie Wales said, "Buzzards gotta eat same as worms.") Then again, we represent a pretty large biomass.
If humans had no compunction about leaving their dead exposed above ground to be disposed of by nature, what would common practice be in the modern world? How would it be handled in major population centers?
(I know this isn't the most poetic comment.)
Posted by: hairshirthedonist | August 20, 2018 at 01:44 PM
The idea of dumping human bodies in the wilderness seems like polluting to me, but large mammals die there all the time, and it's not like there are stinky corpses everywhere. The clean-up crews are pretty efficient. (Josie Wales said, "Buzzards gotta eat same as worms.") Then again, we represent a pretty large biomass.
Yeah, a really really large biomass. A couple of centuries ago, it might have been a viable approach -- at least outside a handful of major urban areas. But today? Just way too large a global population.
Posted by: wj | August 20, 2018 at 02:05 PM
How would it be handled?
Check out the traditional practice of the Zoroastrians. And by the way, they are not extinct and the common prohibitions against their Towers of Silence are hurtful to them.
Posted by: Older | August 20, 2018 at 02:08 PM
My best friend used to say he wanted his body dumped in the woods to be fed on by scavengers.
for science?
Posted by: cleek | August 20, 2018 at 03:27 PM
for science?
Probably just to piss his mother off, but cool link.
Posted by: hairshirthedonist | August 20, 2018 at 03:46 PM
That's a lot of biomass
Thirty million deer in the US.
Average lifespan 4.5 years; call it 5.
Average whitetail 150 lbs.
So yearly, deer carcasses total 900 million lbs.
The scavengers and dermestid beetles make pretty quick work of them, except in deep winter.
33 million people in the US
Average lifespan 79 years.
Average adult weight about 180 lbs
So, yearly, human corpses total 75 million pounds
I don't think the scavengers and beetles would have much problem keeping up.
Posted by: joel hanes | August 20, 2018 at 05:07 PM
33 million??
Posted by: Pro Bono | August 20, 2018 at 05:11 PM
Yes, I had just noticed that and was about to correct it. Thanks for catching it.
325 million people, so
760 million lbs of human carrion yearly;
still less than the deer.
Posted by: joel hanes | August 20, 2018 at 05:17 PM
What portion of the deer are actually dying in the wild? As opposed to going to hunters. (Not to mention the few that ace actually farmed.) May not be that big, but it ought to be checked.
Posted by: wj | August 20, 2018 at 05:31 PM
I've got "Organ Donor" on my DL, so I'm not sure how much of me would be left after doctors took out all the re-usable stuff (as I get older, the answer is probably, "Quite a lot, actually"). And I think what is left over either goes to the med students for dissection purposes, or to the incinerator.
Otherwise, I would love to be left out in the woods.
Posted by: CaseyL | August 20, 2018 at 05:32 PM
Per wj's question, one quick data point from here.
Last fall Maine state biologists hoped hunters would "harvest at least 7,000" deer from a "herd" estimated at 240,000. That's roughly 3% for hunters.
Posted by: JanieM | August 20, 2018 at 05:47 PM
Thanks, Janie. Always good to be clear what we're looking at.
Posted by: wj | August 20, 2018 at 05:55 PM
Oooohhhh, this could be fun. The deer are the least of it.
From 538:
In other words, just the subset of bugs eaten by spiders last year probably outweighs all the humans on Earth.
Posted by: JanieM | August 20, 2018 at 05:57 PM
In other words, just the subset of bugs eaten by spiders last year probably outweighs all the humans on Earth.
But wouldn't we want to limit our comparisons to those processes which digest large (and probably land) mammals, e.g. humans? That being the part of the ecosystem that we are looking at.
Posted by: wj | August 20, 2018 at 06:02 PM
But wouldn't we want to limit our comparisons to those processes which digest large (and probably land) mammals, e.g. humans? That being the part of the ecosystem that we are looking at.
Depends which "we" you're talking about, I suppose.
My basic point, offered lightheartedly, was simply to note the scale of ecological processes in general. But I would make the further point that ecological processes do not happen in silos; it's not called a "system" for nothing. Some of the critters eaten by spiders might well be involved, directly or at one or two steps removed, in the digestion of larger animals.
However, since you seem to have something more specific/different in mind, I will leave you to dredge up your own factoids.
Posted by: JanieM | August 20, 2018 at 06:11 PM
When I am broken, when I depart...When my eyes stray from yours...When I no longer know you, my love...When I am broken, when I depart...Fear not for me, weep not for me...For finally I am released...Fear not for me, weep not for me...To the heaven of all earths...I am released...When from my head my mane is torn...When my hair is blowing in solar wind...When into my eyes driven are the nails...When weighted boots march across my grave
Don’t you fear...Don't you weep...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxFLm58BCYo
Posted by: Nous | August 20, 2018 at 06:12 PM
In other words, just the subset of bugs eaten by spiders last year probably outweighs all the humans on Earth.
But wouldn't we want to limit our comparisons to those processes which digest large (and probably land) mammals, e.g. humans?
spiders eat the bugs
the bugs eat dead stuff. if you leave us laying around, that will include us.
other critters scavenge, too, and make off with the big chunks. but the bugs clean up the scraps.
and, those other critters shuffle off this mortal coil as well, at some point. and the bugs eat them.
everybody is somebody else's lunch.
Posted by: russell | August 20, 2018 at 08:43 PM
I have firmly decided I would be buried, cremated, have a Viking funeral, be buried shallow near Joshua tree and duplicate my grandfather's funeral complete with pewter and copper casket. A at different times of course.
Still, as it approaches, the only thing I am sure of is I want a wake with lots of music. I keep changing the playlist, much to my daughters feigned chagrin.
Posted by: Marty | August 20, 2018 at 08:47 PM
GftNC and joel hanes -- You've both inspired me to actually dig out Spoon River. I haven't read it in many years, and in fact my last experience of it was a performance in a little theater in Boston a long time ago.
russell -- Mt. Auburn is so lovely...I considered it at one point but assumed it would be very expensive, although at the time I was thinking of a burial plot and not cremation. Great choice, and lucky you to be part of a couple to plan with.
hsh: On being dumped in the woods...I've always thought my first choice would be to be buried simply so that my body could be returned to the earth, that is, be turned back *into* earth, without embalming or some fancy pretend-impregnable container slowing the process. That's one reason why the conservation burial ground is of such interest. As to what to do with the dead in major population centers -- it's a major problem. Not going to google, no time right now, but I was just reading recently about how often bodies are moved, buried deeper, etc., in ancient/big cities, where there's just no more space. Here in the wilds of Maine we don't have that problem...yet, and AFAIK.
Posted by: JanieM | August 20, 2018 at 10:57 PM
Body farms: Weirdly enough, I had never heard of this kind of research (described in the link in cleek's 3:27), and now I've come across it twice in the space of a few hours. The second time was a mention in Ali Smith's Winter, which I'm halfway through (a novel).
Biomass: Not to minimize the problem, because it is in fact a problem in populated areas, but on reflection it seems a little ... strange ... to have any doubt about whether the earth that feeds us should have any problem reabsorbing us. I mean, our biomass came from somewhere and is going somewhere -- just as much in perpetual flux as all the other biomass.
But just to add a bit of the practical side, here are a couple of notes from the research the land trust has done:
Sallie Tisdale's book, mentioned in the OP, has sections on the problems of dealing with the dead in populated areas, as well as with the environmental costs, both of conventional burial practices and of cremation.
Posted by: JanieM | August 20, 2018 at 11:12 PM
Obsessiveness is not a virtue, I admit that, and maybe I need a vacation. But sometimes the old OCD-ish inability to let something drop turns up cool stuff.
There are some neat visuals at the link, but in case you don't feel like clicking through, the central factoids of interest at the moment is that humans account for 0.06 Gt C (gigatons of carbon) on the planet, out of 550 Gt C for all life on earth.
So, about 1% of 1%.
The article also has some sobering estimates of the effects humans have had on the biomass of other creatures. To the surprise of no one here, I'm sure, it's not pretty.
*****
And -- since I can get just as crabby about numbers as about grammar, I will note that the authors summarize the numbers by saying of humans that "we make up less than 1 percent of life."
Yes indeed, 1% of 1% is a bit less than 1%.
Sigh.
Posted by: JanieM | August 20, 2018 at 11:51 PM
I've gone off TEDtalks, but before I did, I saw these two
https://www.ted.com/talks/jae_rhim_lee/transcript?language=en
https://www.ted.com/talks/caitlin_doughty_a_burial_practice_that_nourishes_the_planet
https://www.ted.com/talks/alison_killing_what_happens_when_a_city_runs_out_of_room_for_its_dead
Posted by: liberal japonicus | August 21, 2018 at 12:16 AM
Humans currently appropriate about 25% of all plant biomass growth, the "net primary production"
http://www.pnas.org/content/110/25/10324
Posted by: joel hanes | August 21, 2018 at 12:19 AM
Sorry, the first two I saw and the 3rd, I saw when I was searching for the links for the other two.
Posted by: liberal japonicus | August 21, 2018 at 04:37 AM
My kids ask my husband and I
"Cooked or boxed"?
Which we think is rather rude!!!
But I want my ashes scattered in the ocean at Cape Cod
Posted by: Diane | August 21, 2018 at 04:46 PM
My wife chose to be cremated, with her ashes scattered on the rivers where she rowed, and in our garden (I can never move). I've asked for a woodland burial, but our children can choose something else for me if they care.
Posted by: Pro Bono | August 21, 2018 at 06:15 PM
Diane -- perhaps rude, but it's nice that they'll talk about the subject. (Don't know how old they are....my kids are adults but still shy of talking about this. Getting less so, perhaps, which I appreciate.)
Pro Bono -- if you can never move, I hope you like your place!
Here's a poem that helps me loosen my grip, just a bit, on the idea that it matters particularly much where my remains are buried or my ashes scattered.:
*****
Marty mentioned his playlist. I don't have one, but I once told Steve Romanoff (on the right in this link to an album cover and a song) that I wanted Schooner Fare to sing "Lord of the Dance" in my memory when the time comes. Of course, he has probably forgotten, so I should write it down. But Tommy (on the left) departed before the rest of us, far too soon, and Steve and Chuck are both older than I am, so who knows. I love the song even though I have to take it metaphorically, since the literal content is Christ-centered and I am not a Christian.
Posted by: JanieM | August 21, 2018 at 07:10 PM
Perfect, JanieM. I'm a metaphorical Christian [agnostic], and that song works fine for my purposes.
Posted by: sapient | August 21, 2018 at 07:20 PM
Personally I've always rather fancied Strange Boat, from the Waterboys' great album Fisherman's Blues. I'm on my phone so cannot post a link, but for those who don't know it, it's on YouTube and well worth a listen.
Posted by: Girl from the North Country | August 21, 2018 at 07:48 PM
I should start a playlist for my own funeral, which I plan to be held as a week for my loved ones at the Outer Banks, NC, if the venue doesn't predecease me. I will have to gather some original contributions (or at least some stolen from elsewhere).
Posted by: sapient | August 21, 2018 at 08:13 PM
I often think "Happy Trails" would be a good funeral song. Or maybe Groucho's "Hello, I must be going", only without the Captain Spaulding chorus.
It would lighten the mood and give everyone a laugh. What better way to leave one's friends and loved ones.
Less whimsically, maybe the "All I Ask" hymn from the Weston Priory. Just the refrain. But only if everyone sings. That song conjures very good memories, for me.
I'm also Christian, FWIW. Not agnostic, but no creed. I used up all of my 'creed' tickets long long ago. Creeds just seem like attempts to nail down mysteries, and everybody ends up arguing about them.
Homoousios or homoiousios? Let's fight about it!!
Crazy. IMO.
I find the person of Jesus compelling, believe the things he said to the degree and maybe somewhat beyond the degree to which I understand them, and I consider myself accountable to that. And that's about it.
The stuff that I don't completely grasp, I basically just don't worry about. Works for me, everybody has their own understanding of this stuff.
Funny to be discussing this here. The beauty of ObWi is that it's a place where folks discuss unusual stuff.
It is always, I think, worth recognizing that we're all gonna go sooner or later. Not in a morbid way, just in the sense of knowing that the world doesn't revolve around you.
Everyone matters, nobody's important. Or maybe it's the other way around, I always forget. But one of those.
Posted by: russell | August 21, 2018 at 10:07 PM
a playlist for my own funeral
The Rolling Stones "You Can't Always Get"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiw_3olyJ2c
The Beatles, All You Need Is Love
Crosby Stills Nash and Young - Find the Cost of Freedom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMfvYxK9Zoo
Posted by: joel hanes | August 21, 2018 at 10:15 PM
rats. Forgot the penultimate one
Cat Stevens Miles From Nowhere
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLOpyx2bdQA
Posted by: joel hanes | August 21, 2018 at 10:20 PM
I've always thought that if I were a theist, this would be good :
In The Presence Of The Lord
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98XqT4kBWT4
Posted by: joel hanes | August 21, 2018 at 10:27 PM
Lots of good songs.
russell -- I have heard the refrain of "All I Ask" quoted as a saying -- didn't know it was a song. It's lovely either way: "All I ask of you is forever to remember me as loving you."
This leads me along a trail of associations to Annie Dillard asking (in The Writing Life IIRC), "What are we here for?"
And answering: “Propter chorum, the monks say: for the sake of the choir.”
Then again, elsewhere she says "We are here to witness."
Either is fine with me.
Posted by: JanieM | August 21, 2018 at 11:18 PM
The discussion of my playlist began decades ago with my daughter noting it would include Desert Rat by Micheal Murphy. Its diverse and named Songs of My Life.
I love all the songs y'all mention, the only purely religious song on my list is Amazing Grace. I am pretty nondenominational.
Posted by: Marty | August 22, 2018 at 04:34 AM
"Stairway to Heaven" for me.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
(That's a joke.)
Posted by: hairshirthedonist | August 22, 2018 at 10:53 AM
Hairway to Steven, perhaps...?
:)
Posted by: russell | August 22, 2018 at 11:07 AM
"Highway to Hell" would be more appropriate.
Posted by: hairshirthedonist | August 22, 2018 at 11:18 AM
I'll be dead, so I won't care -- though I have left instructions to allow any useful parts to be harvested. Assuming that my wife, who is five years younger, outlives me, she can do whatever makes her happiest.
Posted by: CJColucci | August 22, 2018 at 05:09 PM
This is very interesting because I love music, but when both my parents passed away, the absolute last thing on my mind was music. For my (US) wedding (There was also a ceremony in Japan, but I had, nor did I want, any say in the music or indeed anything else) I chose the music, but the only choice that sticks out was that we had Handel's Ombra ma fu (off Kathleen Battle's cd) for the processional.
I'm now wondering why this is.
Posted by: liberal japonicus | August 22, 2018 at 08:35 PM