by liberal japonicus
This post is basically a text document that I've had open on my desk since yesterday, so apologies for the stream of consciousness. It's been 3 days since I got back (I was in the UK during the two main earthquakes), and 5 days since the main earthquake. The epicenter was about 2 km from my home, and you've all probably read that there was a foreshock 2 days before that centered in Mashiki, which is about 5 km from my home. Rest below the fold
There have been constant aftershocks (I think we are well past 700 now). Because I didn't go thru the big quakes, I attend more to them in some ways, but am a bit less frightened, with my wife and daughters more like vets who can tell from the sound of the shell whether it is coming close or not. We've had the iphone alert go off about 3 times since I've gotten back and it seems that the threshold for those shakes is 5 strong.
The Japanese use the moment system of magnitude that measures the amount of shaking, which is slightly different from the Richter scale that one hears about in the states. The Richter scale systematically underestimates larger events, but it is not clear to me if US reportage has adopted the moment system or is using the Richter scale. For the Japanese, a 7 means "impossible to remain standing, people may be thrown through the air, wooden buildings may fall, and even reinforced concrete walls may collapse". There have only been 4 level 7 events since 1923 in Japan.
The first thing that strikes me is the ability of Japanese society to deal with disasters. Every neighborhood is making hot meals, water is being distributed, lots of volunteer effort. I'm a bit out of sorts because I arrived two days after and pretty much volunteer schedules and work assignments are already filled. I have a bit of a love/hate relationship with Japan, but some of those characteristics that get under my skin are probably what provide the resiliency in times like these.
Unfortunately, there is also the underside of this, twitter and SNS have often dire warnings about strangers looting, attacking people etc. While there are con artists and others around, one can also see a distrust of outsiders, which a lot of foreigners who went to offer help after the Tohoku tsunami noticed when they would try to go up as individuals to help. Whereas the con artists are more likely those who are going to blend in to the group.
The thing that I think really frustrates Japanese the most is the inability to bathe. Kumamoto is famous for hot springs and the local onsen have been open 24 hours a day offering free baths, but the wait is often 3 hours.
I work at a university, and I've been there the past 3 days. The uni staff have been working 24/7 since the quake and they all look exhausted. My school had a department of social welfare with a strong component of working with handicapped, so our school is an evacuation center for many wheelchair bound people because we have handicapped toilets and lots of student volunteers. We were supposed to go back to classes next monday, but I've just gotten word that it will be after the holidays in the first week of May. It looks like several of our older buildings are damaged severely, and our library may have issues. Also, the sprinklers went off on the second floor, and they may have gone off in the basement holdings.
I was at a conference in the UK and when I got back, the last leg that normally takes one hour took about 5, there was an ambulance in front of my house, but it was for the grandfather in the house next door. Then, after getting back and talking with my family, a big aftershock hit w/ iphone alert and my youngest daughter was in tears, saying 'why did you come back, you were safe in Fukuoka'. Don't really have any words to describe my feelings on hearing that.
Going out and about, I'm astonished how little destruction there is. You see the signs, a massive pile of garbage, an unreinforced masonary wall collapsed, a standing building with a big crack in it, a blue tarp on a roof or a building hoarding gone, replaced by a pale area, like a game of I Spy, but despite the fact that the epicenter was under the city, it's not what one would expect. A lot of the pictures and video are from a town called Mashiki, which was the epicenter of the foreshock, and a lot of older buildings there, but in the city, if you didn't realize it, you might be convinced nothing happened.
Still, I wasn't here for the main events, and my wife and daughters only started sleeping inside last night. They also have the TV on all the time, and when I asked them to turn it off, my wife said, the sound of the silence was just too disturbing. I've seen estimates of people who are sleeping in their cars, but I've got no idea how many people actually are, though every school you and park you drive by, you see cars lined up in the open space.
I mentioned that about 48 people have died, and they are finding a few more. In addition, the father of a friend of mine passed away, he was in long term hospital care, so I wonder if his death was hastened by the earthquake, but I imagine, even with those people added, the toll will be in the mid 2 figures. One of the characteristics of Japan is a constant renewal, and the more rigourous standards set out after the Kobe earthquake really seemed to have made a difference.
It's raining today, which is bad news, Kumamoto is very mountainous, and the possibility of landslides is large. There's also some discussion that this pattern of earthquakes has never been seen, and there may be more earthquakes of a similar magnitude moving along the fault line to the SW.
I mentioned my love/hate relationship, and to give an example, people have pulled together amazingly. The Japanese word is gaman, which means 'to endure'. However, it took 5 years for people to leave temporary housing after the Kobe earthquake in 1995, and Kobe was within the Tokyo-Osaka crescent. In Tohoku, 5 years on, students are still in temporary classrooms, and Kumamoto, like Tohoku, is often considered inaka (rural), so I wonder if we will be 'gaman-ing' 5 years from now.
Anyway, those are just some scattered thoughts from here.
Glad you and yours came through OK, lj.
Great reportage.
And your kids will break your heart in such good ways at the most stunning times.
Posted by: Countme-In | April 21, 2016 at 10:19 AM
What count said.
Posted by: Marty | April 21, 2016 at 10:34 AM
I was living in LA for the quake in 94. There was a TV station we had on constantly which had a crawler along the bottom giving the Richter Scale reading for every aftershock, of which there were hundreds for weeks and months, many greater than 5. We became extraordinarily accurate in assessing the number, each stating our bid and then waiting mere moments to see who was closest on the TV. It took a long time to start trusting the solidity of the ground beneath our feet....
Posted by: Girl from the North Country | April 21, 2016 at 12:11 PM
I was in a quake some years back, while working in a high-rise in San Francisco. When the quake hit and the building started shaking, it was instantly apparent who were the native Californians.
The non-natives did one of two things. Some ducked under their desks -- pretty much useless on the 22nd floor of a 30 story building. Others, the seriously ignorant ones, ran over and pressed their noses to the windows to see what was going on. (For those who don't know, when a high-rise sways and flexes, there is a chance that the windows will pop out. Creating a vacuum which can suck out anyone too close to them.)
In contrast, the native Californians casually wandered over to the nearest support pillar, or to the elevators -- both being the structural support most likely to survive a major quake. While commenting to each other: "What do you think? 5.3? 5.4?" (It was a 5.5 actually, but further away than we were assuming.)
P.S. LJ, we are still using the Richter scale here. But then, we are still using feet and inches and gallons and pints. Go figure.
Posted by: wj | April 21, 2016 at 12:30 PM
Damn it.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/prince-dies-57-obit-paisley-park
Posted by: Countme-In | April 21, 2016 at 01:32 PM
I hope that Prince has a magnificent wake, where everyone parties like it's 1999.
Posted by: Snarki, child of Loki | April 21, 2016 at 01:46 PM
Sad to hear that people aren't able to leave the classrooms for somewhere more comfortable yet. And 3 hour lines to bathe... yeah, that'd be miserable.
The reported earthquake scale sounds like the Mercalli scale, which measures lived experience. Do the buildings sway, are train rails deformed, etc?
The Richter scale used to measure the total energy of the earthquake, and has been replaced by the Moment Magnitude scale recently. It looks like the measurement corresponds to the area that breaks free and moves in an earthquake... pretty cool. Well, in a reading wikipedia sense, not in an "I want an earthquake here" sense.
Posted by: Mooseking | April 21, 2016 at 02:22 PM
wj: I don't think ducking under a desk is useless - it's a significant part of my quake survival plan, if feasible - though admittedly I'm not on the 22nd floor of a building. In the Loma Prieta quake, a bunch of the fluorescent light fixtures in the building I worked in broke loose from their supports in the ceiling, and came crashing down, at least partially (most stayed attached to their electric and or support cables). Being under a desk will keep something like that from hitting you on the head and messing up your day. The desk is somewhat less useful in a high-rise to protect against major structural failure, but even then I suspect a desk might create an air pocket for you in the rubble, depending on how the building failed.
The main foolish thing I've seen non-natives do is rush outside the building during or immediately after the quake. That's the main way around here that people get themselves killed in a quake, by getting hit by something falling off the roof. It makes more sense if you're in a part of the world where lots of buildings may collapse in a quake, but California building codes have been pretty good for a long time.
Posted by: Dave W. | April 21, 2016 at 07:23 PM
Well I rushed outside, and then turned around and went back inside.
I have a horror of being buried alive and the quake hit when I was on the first floor of a skyscraper.
Books were falling off the shelves. I was only a few feet from the door, so I just walked out.
Glass was cascading out of windows. The street lights were swaying like seaweed in the surf. There was no where to run, tall buildings everywhere. I stepped back inside and the shaking stopped.
Turns out hardly anything was damaged. I guess downtown Seattle is built for quakes.
Supposedly we are due for a really big one off shore that is predicted to wipe out everyone on the coast from Portland to the Straits. Death by tsumani. There are no evacuation routes out there that amount to anything. Most places you can't even run up hill enough to help yourself.
People in Oceanshores will just die. I have heard that some of the Native communities are moving to higher ground. It makes me nervous about our annual camping trip to the coast: is that how I will die? Washed out to sea? From what I understand, there might be about fifteen minutes notice. In the campgrounds there might not be any notice at all.
Is it a sign of aging that I worry about stuff like this? I never thought twice about disasters when I was younger.
Thank you for the account. I am glad your family made it unscathed.
Posted by: wonkie | April 21, 2016 at 09:50 PM
I live in the SF Bay area and I was here for the Loma Prieta quake in '89. I happened to be on the 2nd floor of a typical tilt-up in San Jose and it was a bit exciting, but nothing was damaged.
A few years before I was consulting for the University of California, Berkeley and I drove on the Cypress structure (the one that collapsed) quite frequently. *whew*!
Best regards and good luck to you all.
Posted by: ral | April 21, 2016 at 10:57 PM
I survived the quake of '84 when Reagan won 49 states. You just gotta' keep movin' on and bury these f*ckers. Their time will come.
Posted by: bobbyp | April 24, 2016 at 12:14 AM
Is this thing still on?
Posted by: Slartibartfast | April 26, 2016 at 08:06 AM
No. Leave us alone.
Posted by: hairshirthedonist | April 26, 2016 at 08:32 AM
HSH: get a room, already.
Posted by: Snarki, child of Loki | April 26, 2016 at 10:00 AM
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Yep, still on. Waiting for any sign that there is anything left to discuss in the world that we haven't fully presented both sides, and the Obama is always right view. Luckily he has decided to fix Europe this week so the rest of the world is safe.
Posted by: Marty | April 26, 2016 at 10:10 AM
Obama only needs to be right 51% of the time.
Which would make it 51% to nothing.
Posted by: Countme-In | April 26, 2016 at 12:05 PM
Everybody needs an occasional vacation. Even us. And when all of us decide to GAFIAte at the same time . . . .
Posted by: wj | April 26, 2016 at 12:28 PM
At least Obama is not working on rising his popularity over here this time. I doubt that him beating the drum for TTIP will have any positive effect on German public opinion, and Merkel needs no encouragemnet there. The German equivalents of the US Chamber of Commerce pushing for 'sign it now, no time to lose, watering down anything in it or leaving stuff for later will cause the world to end to-morrow' at the very same time does not help one iota either.
Posted by: Hartmut | April 26, 2016 at 01:48 PM
Seems to be doing the opposite just now, popularitywise, if anything.
Elsewhere, I thought this, and its explanation for Trump, interesting:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/04/john_kasich_could_ve_been_the_gop_s_salvation_instead_he_helped_donald_trump.html
Of course Trump's willingness to 'do-anything-it-takes' doesn't mean he has a clue what that anything might be (other than as regards getting the nomination).
Posted by: Nigel | April 26, 2016 at 02:17 PM
Clue:
http://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/trump-at-war/
Trump said his sex life in the Sixties was his "own personal Vietnam".
He'll know how to fight ISIS, because he fought the herpes, the crabs, and the clap on the front line, though knowing him, he probably knows how to sneak up on em from behind too, especially if they are tied up and gagged.
It was hand-to-crotch combat and, let me tell you, it was the most disgusting thing he's ever liked.
There's a reason Republicans are increasingly itching to vote for him.
His first wife's name was Chlamydia Trump.
We're gonna need us some Republican-only bathroom facilities in this here country, if only to enforce the seat-up policy while we're pissing in the pot we don't have.
Posted by: Countme-In | April 26, 2016 at 03:09 PM
Nigel, as I read that article, it isn't Trump who is "willing to do whatever it takes." That was used to characterize Trump's supporters' view on what should be done about the economy. And, incidentally, to characterize Kasich's approach to governing.
The tragedy for the Republicans this time around is that Kasich didn't manage to connect with those who could have been his biggest supporters.
Posted by: wj | April 26, 2016 at 03:19 PM
Not to be outdone, Ted Cruz says he'll wear a diaper and pee his pants from here on out if transgendered folks are permitted to use ANY public bathroom:
'Ted Cruz’s tour de transphobia, launched last week to capitalize on Donald Trump’s criticism of North Carolina’s anti-transgender law, has embraced a new extreme position. Speaking to reporters this weekend in Indiana, he actually admitted that he doesn’t believe transgender people should be allowed to use any restroom except the ones in the privacy of their own home.
“Every one of us has the right to live our lives as we wish,” he said. “If any one of us wants to dress up as a woman or man and wants to live as woman or man and believes that we might be something other than what we were born, God has made each of us with free will and the ability to choose to do that if man to wants to dress as a woman, and live as a woman, and have a bathroom at home.”
'A reporter sought clarification on the remark: “So then they shouldn’t use the bathroom out in public?”
Cruz then confirmed just that. “You don’t have a right to intrude upon the rights of others because whether or not a man believes he’s a woman, there are a lot of women who would like to be able to use a public restroom in peace without having a man there — and when there are children involved, you don’t have a right to impose your lifestyle on others.” '
This explains why, while lecturing down to all of us, he always has the smug look on his face of a precocious two-year-old who is letting go with a number two.
Posted by: Countme-In | April 26, 2016 at 03:30 PM
Well, since some of you are keeping the lights on, here you go.........
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot
bomb throwing at its finest.
Posted by: bobbyp | April 26, 2016 at 07:18 PM
The American Family Association, who is boycotting Target over the bathroom fracas, but who also fakes not knowing that it has cross dressers and transgender folks among its family members, is boycotting Ted Cruz as well now because of his suggestion above that men who live and dress as women should be permitted to have a bathroom in their homes.
No word on women who live as men, but they may get a pass because they have been lowering the toilet seat after going all along, which made them a superior, well-mannered man despite their lifestyle choice.
Posted by: Countme-In | April 26, 2016 at 09:01 PM
as I read that article, it isn't Trump who is "willing to do whatever it takes." That was used to characterize Trump's supporters' view on what should be done about the economy...
Hey, wj.
Perhaps I failed fully to lay out the thought process, but the point is that they believe Trump to be that guy - and not without reason, as he doesn't appear to have any self-imposed (or ideological) limits on what he's prepared to do.
Which is a little worrying for the rest of the world.
Posted by: Nigel | April 27, 2016 at 11:20 AM
Misogyny will be the base line in the ugly Republican campaign soundtrack against Hillary Clinton that is coming right up, just like racism and racial slurs were the fundamental drumbeat played against Barack Obama during the last two Presidential campaigns:
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/4/27/1520593/-Donald-Trump-runs-for-president-of-the-He-Man-Women-Haters-Club
It will sound very much like this on Twitter and among the right-wing blog vermin, especially the examples toward the end of the clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tU-D-m2JY8
At some point during this long summer and fall, Donald Trump will re-tweet bumpkin Rethugs calling Clinton the c-word, just as the n-word and its synonyms were so often invoked by Tea Party racist filth and their so-called political representatives against Obama.
Trump: "We know what people are calling her, don't we? I'm told by the politically correct crowd that I can't say that word, and I won't, but it's a terrific word, let me tell you, I've dated and have even married many of them in my own personal war years, which I like to call my Tet Offensive, and believe you me, I deserve more Veterans Dept medical help than all of those sorry-assed veterans, but I ask you, when is that you-know-what Clinton going to stop her shouting? It's making my head hurt! Someone give ME a Purple Heart! ME!!"
It's what gets the base to the polls.
Cancel the 2020 elections and just start the shooting.
Posted by: Countme-In | April 27, 2016 at 11:32 AM
he doesn't appear to have any self-imposed (or ideological) limits on what he's prepared to do.
The term "loose cannon" might have been invented for him. Not only are there no self-imposed limits on him, there don't seem to be any directional limits either. He not only might do anything, he might go off in any direction at all.
The rest of the world may only consider that "a little worrying" (or was that just British understatement? ;-). But from the US, it looks down-right scary.
Posted by: wj | April 27, 2016 at 12:21 PM
Misogyny will be the base line in the ugly Republican campaign soundtrack against Hillary Clinton that is coming right up, just like racism and racial slurs were the fundamental drumbeat played against Barack Obama during the last two Presidential campaigns
And the problem with that (for someone trying to run a successful campaign) is that there are a lot more women voters to be offended than there were black voters.
Posted by: wj | April 27, 2016 at 12:22 PM
But from the US, it looks down-right scary.
Pres. Trump: "Hey, what does this red button do?"
Posted by: Snarki, child of Loki | April 27, 2016 at 02:50 PM