by Doctor Science
I took a rather exhausting road trip Wednesday through Friday. I was already supposed to pick Sprog the Younger up at her Boston Area Liberal Arts College on Thursday morning, which involves driving up to my parents' place in northeastern CT on Wednesday, picking up Sprog on Thursday, staying overnight with the folks, then driving back to NJ on Friday. The trip is spread out like this to give time with the folks, and also because by shortening each day's travel I can manage to (a) not have to drive after dark, while (b) not hitting any rush hours along the way.
But last Sunday night a dear friend's mother dropped dead of a heart attack. They live toward the end of the North Fork of Long Island, so I changed my route but not my schedule. I still left on Wednesday, but I drove from NJ to Hellandgone, LI, attended the wake, then took the Orient Point Ferry to CT and so to home.
UGH. For those of you who aren't familiar with the region, here's the Google Traffic Map right now, late on a Sunday morning:
The problem is to figure out the best way to get from the left side of the map to the right. Essentially, there are two routes: northern, taking the George Washington Bridge -> Cross-Bronx Expressway -> Throgs Neck Bridge -> Long Island Expressway; or southern, across Staten Island -> Verrazano-Narrows Bridge -> the southern shore of Brooklyn -> Long Island.
I looked at the traffic map on Wednesday morning, and the two routes seemed roughly comparable. But then I thought about the bridges.
I have a bit of acrophobia, enough to make driving (or walking) across bridges a very anxious experience. The best I can do is to try never to be in an outside lane, focus on the vehicle ahead of me, concentrate on keeping a good following distance, while doing conscious yoga-style breathing -- and never, *ever*, looking off to the sides. I've been over the Tappan Zee Bridge enough to be somewhat acclimated -- but I'm not used to either the George Washington or the Verrazano. (I've never driven over the Delaware Memorial Bridge, and I don't know if I could. This is what marriage is for, kids: someone to drive over the bridges.)
My mother, BTW, tells me that she's never driven over a major bridge. "Even as a passenger -- my eyes are closed the whole time, so it didn't happen." One of her favorite technological innovations (she just turned 90) is completely enclosed elevators.
It turns out that both the GWB and the Verrazano are 65-70m above the water (half again as high as the Tappan Zee), and have a center (suspension) span just over a km in length (3 times as long as the TZB). But overall, the Verrazano is much longer -- 4km, as opposed to the GWB's 1.5km. That's a lot more yoga breathing, so I decided to go with the GWB.
As I came up to the bridge, I realized I could choose to be on the lower deck, which has the double advantage of making going over the bridge feel more like going through a nice, comforting tunnel, and also: no trucks. So the crossing wasn't as bad as I feared, and the rest of the trip out to Hellandgone was not bad for the territory: few slowdowns, not too much construction, traffic moving smoothly. It seems to me, in fact, that NYC-area superhighway driving is less traumatizing than in the Philadelphia area -- fewer people suddenly deciding to move across three lanes without signaling, for instance. But maybe it's just that I wasn't driving at rush hour.
I've never been out to the North Fork before, and holy libations, Batman! there are a lot of vineyards. I should visit my friend more often ...
Speaking of whom, if you're a less-young woman and you want to frighten the pants off yourself, look for info on "heart attacks in women". The symptoms are distressingly vague and often involve no chest pain. No wonder at least one study found
some of the women ignored their symptoms whereas others repeatedly sought medical care only to have their doctors minimize, misdiagnose or ignore their symptoms.So, surprise surprise:
women are more apt than men to die shortly after a heart attackand
Since 1984, more women than men have died each year from heart disease.I didn't know that. Maybe participating in the Go Red Heart Health Study wouldn't be a bad idea ...
This photo actual conveys a little bit of what bridges mean to me. It's by Oleg Samorez, of the October bridge over the Volga at Cherepovets.
I don't know from bridges, but I do know that travel on the Cross-Bronx Expressway is a time-consuming disaster.
Take the other route.
Posted by: byomtov | May 10, 2015 at 09:29 PM
My condolences, for all of it.
PARTICULARLY the drive on the LIE. There's this ONE GUY...grrr
Posted by: Snarki, child of Loki | May 10, 2015 at 09:30 PM
Are you afraid of heights in general Dr Science or is your problem just bridges period?
Posted by: Turbulence | May 10, 2015 at 09:40 PM
Lincoln tunnel, then straight across to the Queens Midtown, which puts you on the LIE.
The crosstown thing can be a nightmare, but maybe not so bad on a Sunday.
I left Long Island in 81. Haven't been back since probably about 85. Too many people.
Posted by: russell | May 10, 2015 at 09:46 PM
byomtov:
I guess I wasn't clear -- I did this on Wednesday, and the Cross-Bronx wasn't too bad (going east, at least -- I wouldn't have wanted to be one of the poor souls going west). And the Brooklyn-side roads were worse, not to mention Staten Island ...
Posted by: Doctor Science | May 10, 2015 at 10:04 PM
russell:
I did this last Wednesday, and cross-town would have been horrific. The Cross-Bronx was OK that day.
Posted by: Doctor Science | May 10, 2015 at 10:05 PM
Turbulence:
Heights in general, but bridges are the worst because they come up most often and have to be dealt with. I have only rarely found myself in a glass elevator.
When I moved to Philly for grad school, I knew I'd need to be able to get downtown by foot. So that first fall I walked back and forth across the Chestnut Street Bridge with a friend. First I walked next to the road and he walked between me and the river, with me clutching his arm with a deathlike grip. Then after I got used to that, we switched so I was nearer the river, still with the deathlike grip. Eventually I acclimated enough that I could walk across by myself.
But this took quite a while, and the Chestnut, Market, and Walnut Street Bridges are hilariously tame: completely flat, very wide, and only about 40 feet above the water. The very thought of something like the Walkway Over the Hudson makes me feel faint.
Posted by: Doctor Science | May 10, 2015 at 10:22 PM
Given a choice of driving thru New York City, I think I would fly from Newark to Boston and rent a car.
I've driven in most major cities in the US, and a number of others big citiers around the world. But the only one which is anywhere near as bad as NYC is Sydney, Australia.
Posted by: wj | May 10, 2015 at 10:33 PM
Doctor Science, if you're looking for help conquering a fear of heights, might I recommend a session at flying trapeze school? They usually have a net underneath you a harness on your person....
Posted by: Turbulence | May 10, 2015 at 11:34 PM
Interestingly going above a certain height seems to cancel the effect. I do not like crossing high bridges either but have little trouble looking out of airplanes once they are up a few hundred meters. I guess it has something to do with the landscape getting two-dimensional in perception combined with a perceived slow movement. My stomach turns once it is fast movement, in particular maneuvres, at low heights. I also hate big jumps in 1st-person-view videogames (slightly less so in 3rd-person-view). Why the $§%&! am I afraid looking at a collection of pixilated polygons jumping down hills on a small screen while I am sitting safely at a desk in front of it?
Posted by: Hartmut | May 11, 2015 at 05:07 AM
Hartmut:
I just found out that the general phenomenon is called visual height intolerance -- "acrophobia" is when it becomes severe enough to significantly hamper life. A friend from Pittsburgh reports that she's known people to move away because of the stress of dealing with all the bridges.
Wikipedia suggests that the problem is over-relying on visual signals (as opposed to vestibular) as height increases, which leads to a kind of overload of the visual processing system.
I, too, find that I don't have problems in a plane, so it's probably that the signals we're relying on to interpret "dangerous height!" are no longer working. As you say, the landscape becomes 2-dimensional, the usual 3-D info isn't there at all.
Posted by: Doctor Science | May 11, 2015 at 09:00 AM
I did this last Wednesday, and cross-town would have been horrific.
Yeah, I hear you.
I think I did that once on a weekday, or maybe a Saturday, long time ago. It took me something like an hour to get across town.
Manhattan, at that point, is about 2 miles wide, give or take.
Plus, if memory serves, the tunnels themselves can suck pretty badly. The Lincoln in particular.
Forget I even mentioned it.... :(
Last time I was on the North Fork, the big local industries were potatoes and fishing. My understanding is that the weir fishing is kind of all gone now, due to being insufficiently scenic for the tastes of swanky new arrivals.
No grapes back in the day.
Far eastern LI used to be kind of an interesting cultural eco-system of its own, more like southern New England than like NY. Locals had their own dialect, very distinct from the western part of the Island, with odd archaic English words and usages.
Still some of those folks around, probably. Maybe some of them run vineyards now.
Posted by: russell | May 11, 2015 at 09:09 AM
I've driven in most major cities in the US, and a number of others big citiers around the world. But the only one which is anywhere near as bad as NYC is Sydney, Australia.
Well, it's worth remembering that there's different sorts of "bad". The worst two I've ever had the pleasure of experiencing are Honolulu and Bangalore, but those are bad in very different ways.
Posted by: Nombrilisme Vide | May 11, 2015 at 10:16 AM
There used to be truck traffic on both decks of the GWB. They decided to restrict trucks to the upper deck after 9/11, for whatever security reasons. This was controversial, because many people, including some having real expertise in transportation and traffic, thought it would disrupt the flow of traffic across the bridge. As it turrned out, it improved the flow of traffic, and the rule remains in place to this day.
Posted by: hairshirthedonist | May 11, 2015 at 10:49 AM
My reaction to heights is a little more nuanced. I think it has something to do with the perception of whether falling ia actually possible. For example, I get twitchy just going up a ladder to clean the rain gutters. But I have no problem walking on a bridge which has at least some railing on the side. And airplanes are so little problem that I can even do takeoffs and landings (as pilot) without any problem.
I do not, however, have the least desire to try the trapese thing, net or no. Let alone try skydiving -- even with two parachutes.
I don't recall having this problem as a child. We re-roofed the house one year, and I was up there climbing around and unrolling the roofing, etc. So I suspect it may have something to do with the time (as an adult) when I was sweeping off the leaves on my parents' (flat) roof. And managed to forget about the skylight over the entry. I have this snapshot image from the way down, with the roof about chest high. (No physical injury, fortunately. But apparently some psychological after-effects.)
Posted by: wj | May 11, 2015 at 12:00 PM
Had a roomate who was a world class rock climber.
It blew me away watching him free climb El Capitan.
He broke his femer falling from a step ladder.
Be safe out there, being high is not your enemy.
Posted by: jeff | May 11, 2015 at 12:29 PM
I have an uncle, now 89 years old, who lives in Brooklyn Heights just a few blocks from the foot of the Brooklyn Bridge.
We last visited in 2000.
The exit plan was to drive uptown to the George Washington Bridge on the far upper west side.
I decided to be adventurous, as it was a Sunday if I recall, and so we crossed the Brooklyn Bridge and drove Broadway all the way up.
Traffic seemed heavy for a Sunday, but I thought my son, who was 11 at the time, would enjoy being in the midst of one of the biggest metropolises in the universe and craning his neck up at the skyscrapers.
It was a brilliant sunny day.
About half way up we ran into the funeral procession and wake for Tito Puente outside of wherever it was held.
Traffic ground to a stop for a good hour but we got to see Tito's casket across the street held aloft by the crowds mamboing to "Oye Como Va".
So, if you get stuck in the spectacle that is Manhatten, there are always countervailing pleasures to the urban annoyance.
If you get stuck, Doc, maybe we'll see you in a traffic scene in a forthcoming movie, window rolled down with your weary head propped up by your elbow resting on the door, your other hand jammed on the horn for a New York minute.
Posted by: Countme-In | May 11, 2015 at 12:30 PM
Hey, you want to try "death defying heights" try going up the Leaning Tower (in Pisa) on a drizzly, blustery day.
From the ground, it looks like it's just a 10 degree tilt. When you get to the top, it feels like about 45 degrees, the top is a narrow little ring of slick polished marble (wet!), and the railing is a tiny little thing with just a few supports.
But the view is fantastic.
Posted by: Snarki, child of Loki | May 11, 2015 at 12:40 PM
jeff, I have a lot of friends that are acrobats and gymnasts and most serious accidents they have occur outside the studio/gym. One woman is a gymnast who broke her wrist badly enough to need surgery and six months of PT: she was hit by a car while biking.
I think that when doing dangerous things normally, people aggressively control risk, so they don't attempt moves beyond their capabilities until they're ready, they have spotters helping out, there are thick crash mats, etc. Outside, danger is not nearly so well managed.
Posted by: Turbulence | May 11, 2015 at 12:46 PM
wj:
My fear of heights goes back at least as long as I can remember. The building where my father's office was until I was 11 had an open stairwell, and I remember being paralyzed with fear, crying and crawling along the wall.
Posted by: Doctor Science | May 11, 2015 at 02:14 PM
Did the sky dive just once, but will never bungee jump, nor this either.
Posted by: bobbyp | May 11, 2015 at 04:24 PM
bobbyp, wow, that was pretty impressive. But where's the artistry? Here's an alternative perspective on working without a safety line.
Posted by: Turbulence | May 11, 2015 at 06:22 PM
From the Mackinaw Bridge's FAQ:
What if I am not comfortable about driving across the bridge?
Answer:
The Mackinac Bridge Authority has a "Drivers Assistance Program" that provides drivers for those uncomfortable with driving across the Mackinac Bridge. If you are traveling northbound, there is a phone at the south end of the bridge. Instructions for using the phone are posted in the phone box. If you are southbound, just ask a fare collector for assistance. There is no additional fee for this service.
http://www.mackinacbridge.org/frequently-asked-questions-17/Bridge+services/
Posted by: rea | May 12, 2015 at 08:14 AM
Mackinac Bridge, only because I drove it last Fall.
Mackinaw City, but Mackinac Island. Everything is Macki-this and Macki-that on that end of the Upper P.
I was a bit skittish about driving it so I availed myself of the service. Nice younger lady name of Beatrice was my driver guide across, with her caramel lab, Virgil.
We went far together. To Hell and back, actually, but you get lost in those dark woods on the Peninsula and you'll never find your way out.
Ghosts of the Ojibwa.
Actually, rea, that service would be an excellent metaphor leading off a love story combined with a road movie, or maybe something more sinister.
Posted by: Countme-In | May 12, 2015 at 08:52 AM
Mackinaw City, but Mackinac Island.
Pronounced identically.
Posted by: rea | May 13, 2015 at 03:51 PM