by liberal japonicus
I cracked open my google news, and saw this
And thought SC in the second headline was Supreme Court... Thoughts?
Important Notes
Alumni
Search
Blogroll
- bastard.logic
- Daniel Larison
- Attempts
- Balkinization
- Balloon Juice
- Benjamin David Steele
- Brad DeLong
- Cato-at-liberty
- Charlie Pierce
- cleek
- Crooked Timber
- Daily Kos
- Debate Link
- Down With Tyranny!
- Edge of the American West
- Eschaton
- Ezra Klein
- Feministe
- Gin and Tacos
- Hit & Run
- Hullabaloo
- Juan Cole
- Juanita Jean
- Kevin Drum
- Lawyers, Guns and Money
- Mark Kleiman
- Matthew Yglesias
- Maxspeak
- Mercury Rising
- Michael Cain's Random Policy
- Mightygodking
- Mike the Mad Biologist
- Orcinus
- Paul Krugman
- Pharyngula
- Philosophy, et cetera
- Radley Balko
- Rogue Columnist
- Sadly, No!
- Shakesville
- Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
- Ta-Nehisi Coates
- Talking Points Memo
- TAPPED
- The Sideshow
- The Weekly Sift
- Fafblog (on twitter)
- Unfogged
- Washington Monthly
« Do US flag officers believe Iraq had WMDs? | Main | Why the Affordable Care Act is "socialism" »
June 26, 2012
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Andrew Olmsted
Recent Comments
- novakant on Yet another open thread
- wj on Yet another open thread
- Donald on Yet another open thread
- Hartmut on Yet another open thread
- GftNC on Yet another open thread
- Donald on Yet another open thread
- Donald on Yet another open thread
- novakant on Yet another open thread
- Donald on Yet another open thread
- novakant on Yet another open thread
Don't be silly. No one beats the Supreme Court 4-1.
Posted by: dr ngo | June 26, 2012 at 01:09 AM
Even on penalties?
Posted by: liberal japonicus | June 26, 2012 at 01:12 AM
No, because John Roberts gets to call balls and strikes.
Posted by: NickT | June 26, 2012 at 03:47 AM
We play better baseball than we do politics out here in the wild, wild west.
Posted by: xanax | June 26, 2012 at 04:13 AM