by liberal japonicus
I mentioned that I was really attracted to the Guardian site after reading it quite a bit for the Murdoch phone hacking scandal. The paper has been, strangely enough, a thread for me in my wanderings. I remember getting it in the UK when I visited my uncle on numerous occasions and turning to it when I lived in Europe. When I first came to Japan, I got an international subscription, which would come on this incredibly, almost tissue like paper. But there were more substantive reasons that I put below the fold.
Wading into the paper as a website this past month has let me to rediscover some other reasons why I am attracted to the paper. Part of it is like listening to a conversation about a subject you are faintly aware of, but don't know all the details. While that is my life in Japan pretty much 24-7, having it in a version of your native tongue that still has enough twists and turns to keep one interested is nice. This video, part of Janes Richardson's review of European papers on football, is a nice example of that.
But another thing that I only realized that I enjoy with this revisit is that they also look at American culture as an outsider. This article is an interview with Glen Campbell, who has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's. First of all, I'm not sure if a US newspaper would have an interview with Campbell and if it did one, I feel like it would gloss over the various points in his career on the assumption that everyone reading would know them. Also impressive is the way the interviewer deals with a question that people might have, but doesn't spell it out completely, which is if Glen Campbell is showing the effects of Alzheimers so strongly, how can he be the co-composer of 5 of the songs on the album. Here's the paragraph:
Julian Raymond, the producer of Ghost On The Canvas, arrives. He and Campbell share song-writing credits on five songs on the album. How did the collaboration work? "We'd talk about stuff; things that were going on in his life, things that happened, and I'd nurse them into stories he could feel good about," Raymond says. "The classic one to me was we were hanging out in the kitchen, Kim was there, and he was talking about some of the more traumatic times in his life and he said, 'Look, there's no me without her.' So we changed it to 'There's no me without you'. It's about their relationship – he really wasn't expecting her to come along in his life. I'd keep a journal and we'd talk about the struggles of him being confused."
I don't want to beat up on some stereotype of US journalism, but I feel that if this were in a US paper, there would be the desire to frame this as the answer to an explicit question, whereas here, the question is in the background and only comes up when you reflect on the piece.
There was another observation that fascinated me, which was this:
Ashley found it distressing when they were gigging and nobody knew what was wrong. "When he messed up, people were coming up to me after shows and saying, 'Is your dad drunk or is he using again?' It upset me. Now this is out they're just going to be supporting and loving him rather than being angry that they paid to see him."
Nothing about Campbell had changed, but the added bit of information, that he was suffering from Alzheimer's, changed their attitudes. It makes me wonder what other information is out there that might effect a similar change in people.
I once read about David L. Lander -- Squiggy to Michael McKean's Lenny -- who has had MS for some time now. Early on, when he was losing motor control and slurring his words, he was afraid that if people found out he was sick he'd never work again, so he preferred that people think he was drunk.
So I guess it all depends, he said sagely.
Posted by: DonBoy | August 29, 2011 at 10:04 PM
The quality of life and security for the citizens has been largely restored and we are a large part of why that has happened.
Posted by: Dominic Caraccilo | August 29, 2011 at 10:13 PM
You know, lj, I appreciate the subtlety of your writings and the way you sidle up to the point of your posts.
Glenn Campbell has Alzheimers Disease.
Very underrated, facile guitar player. I mean, really good. Wonderful voice, able to harmonize under Brian Wilson's five-part harmonies with the Beach Boys for a short time. The perfect voice for Jimmy Webb to latch on to for those great songs.
A workmanlike musician. Collaborated with everyone; from Shindig to whatever.
Man, that is sad.
What's next -- Ringo has the Marbel virus?
Posted by: Countme-In | August 29, 2011 at 11:49 PM
By the way, this: "share song-writing credits for five songs on the album."
Yeah, well, Brian Wilson wrote "Surf's Up", a gorgeous piece of art, while sitting in a sandbox in his living room with a stick between his teeth and gibbering "Daddy effed me over", with the additional insult that Mike Love thought it didn't sound enough like "Papa ooh Mau Mau" for the pop market, the dumbsh*t libertarian.
Posted by: Countme-In | August 30, 2011 at 12:00 AM
I'm extremely sorry to hear about Campbell. I hate to differ with the Count, but Campbell was well beyond workmanlike. The man was, and likely still is, an absolutely ass-kicking guitar player.
The Wrecking Crew were absolute A-list pop royalty. Serious, brilliant players. They could turn absolute musical turds into gold. Funny as hell.
Hard-working cats, too. As an aside, it cracks me up when I read about folks in finance b**ching because they're working long hours and not getting big enough bonuses. Every working musician I know will work 12 hour days, 7 days a week, and smile.
I have a reply to this:
how can he be the co-composer of 5 of the songs on the album.
I guess you could read this as Raymond being basically the ghost writer of the tunes, with Campbell contributing not much more than his name.
But I think that's actually unlikely. The reality is that music comes from a different part of our consciousness.
It makes total sense to me that Campbell can continue to be a freaking brilliant musician, while suffering the cognitive trauma that comes with Alzheimers.
This is kind of deep water to paddle around in, but IMO our understanding of the depth and complexity of our consciousness as humans is severely, and IMO kind of tragically, limited by the empirical focus of modern life.
It's likely that the last thing Campbell will lose is his musical intelligence. He may never lose it, even if he forgets his own damned name.
Posted by: russell | August 30, 2011 at 12:42 AM
Absolutely no disagreement, Russell, on Campbell's guitar playing, which I think I expressed, though not as well as what Russell said.
By workmanlike, I mean, brilliant at 3.23 am with the Wrecking Crew, any time, any place, just for the fun skill of it, and giving it all for whomever was fronting.
But underrated as a guitar player, among the crew out there who only remember "Wichita Lineman" and never wrecked anything so well as they did.
But you take it
Posted by: Countme-In | August 30, 2011 at 01:35 AM
brilliant at 3.23 am with the Wrecking Crew, any time, any place, just for the fun skill of it, and giving it all for whomever was fronting.
Now that's what I'm talking about!!
There are a lot of folks like this. Funk Brothers in Detroit, the Swampers in Muscle Shoals, the collection of brilliant unassuming casual virtuosos that make up the rotating pools of session players in LA, NYC, Nashville, and a handful of other American cities.
What the Count said here is perfectly and exactly so. I think I may need to bronze it.
Posted by: russell | August 30, 2011 at 08:03 AM
On the topic of "view of an outsider", I went to hear a friend play in a local club last night. My buddy was on Hammond B3, plus drums, plus trumpet and tenor.
The drummer was an English guy. A brilliant, extremely accomplished, actually quite famous drummer. You might not recognize his name, but I can almost guarantee that you've heard his playing.
It was basically a jazz gig.
I could not get my head around what the drummer was playing. It was extremely skillful, very creative and interesting, very cool in many ways.
But it was, to me, jarringly odd. The stuff he was playing was all good and often pretty hip, but it was jumbled up in a weird way. He would play a very cool thing, at a very uncool time.
It was like listening to somebody speaking English words, and even mostly English syntax, and saying intelligent things, but saying them at times and contexts that rendered them bizarrely inappropriate.
I couldn't understand what it was that he was *hearing*, that would lead him to make the choices he was making.
I'm re-reading, for the nth time, John Chernoff's "African Rhythm and African Sensibility". Early in the book Chernoff describes a very basic, and very ubiquitous, difference in how Africans and Westerners experience the basic rhythmic pulse in music.
When listening to music in 4/4 time, Westerners will clap on 1 and 3. If 3/4 time, Westerners will clap on 1.
Africans, on 2 and 4, or 2 and 3.
Same music, but people hear different things.
If you want to get inside a culture, the nut to crack is the art. Music, visual art, poetry, dance. When you understand what people think are beautiful and meaningful, you have their mind.
The particular point LJ raises here is very interesting, I think:
I feel that if this were in a US paper, there would be the desire to frame this as the answer to an explicit question, whereas here, the question is in the background and only comes up when you reflect on the piece
My thought about this is that British people, on the whole, and British culture, values discretion and basic decency more highly than we do.
OK, so they show boobs on page 6. But other than that, I mean.
Posted by: russell | August 30, 2011 at 08:22 AM
LJ, thanks for continuing to look well below the surface. I mean this in a completely complimentary way: you make my head hurt sometimes. Thinkiness does that to me.
Posted by: McKinneyTexas | August 30, 2011 at 10:29 AM
Yes, russell, but they are decent boobs, so ... English :)
Posted by: firefall | August 30, 2011 at 10:51 AM
We think of ourselves as a single entity, but watching a someone disappear into Alzheimer's challenges that notion. My father started treatment for Alzheimer's four years ago. In person he no longer has any idea who I am but when we speak on the phone he immediately recognizes my voice and knows our relationship. He will ask me the way to the restroom in the house he where he has lived for the last 20+ years, yet last weekend we talked about the repairs I am making on my tractor/backhoe and he still knows diesel mechanics better than I.
Posted by: Baskaborr | August 30, 2011 at 08:03 PM
Baskaborr, I'm sorry about your father with Alzheimer's. I'll echo russell's thoughts about Alzheimer's with my observation that music is one of the things that was still intact in my friend with Alzheimer's. Humor was another thing. It's hard to get through a loved one's Alzheimer's (or other dementia), but it's an incredible opportunity to learn some things about the person, and to love that person finally.
Posted by: Sapient | August 30, 2011 at 08:27 PM
Given that the boobs are traditionally on page 3, page 6 is clearly a sign of decency and restraint.
Posted by: Hartmut | August 31, 2011 at 03:38 AM
We subscribe to the Guardian Weekly mostly for its much clearer coverage of US events.
Also, because of past history of empire, it considers world news important.
Posted by: peggy | August 31, 2011 at 03:55 PM
Correction, Hartmut. They show breasts on p3. Boobs are normally on the front page, under "politics."
Posted by: dr ngo | August 31, 2011 at 04:30 PM
I thought those were the boobies (German: Tölpel, which also means idiot/moron/twit)
Posted by: Hartmut | August 31, 2011 at 04:44 PM
I recently heard a report">http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2011/08/21/139797360/cuddling-with-9-smooching-with-8-winking-at-7?ft=1&f=1130">report of a "what's your favorite number" survey on NPR.
It seems 5319009 is popular these days (upside down on a calculator: "boobies").
Posted by: ral | August 31, 2011 at 04:57 PM
Same music, but people hear different things.
Posted by: Madonna | August 31, 2011 at 11:17 PM