by Doctor Science
This post is about the attack on Lara Logan, and rape as a weapon of war and policy.
Summary: Sexualized violence, rape, and even gang rape are not just signs of bestiality, barbarism, or boys inevitably being boys: they can be military and police tactics, and they are part of the toolbox of U.S. as well as Egyptian military/intelligence forces.
SERIOUS TRIGGER AND RAGE WARNING.
As reported by CBS news:
Lara Logan was covering the jubilation in Tahrir Square for a "60 Minutes" story when she and her team and their security were surrounded by a dangerous element amidst the celebration. It was a mob of more than 200 people whipped into frenzy.As with any report about rape, some of the news and blogospheric coverage -- and many blog and especially news-site comments -- have been horrifically vile, the kind of thing that makes a woman think about moving to (a) a lesbian separatist commune, or (b) Mars. Mary Elizabeth Williams at Salon has a good roundup, filtered for your sanity and blood pressure.In the crush of the mob, she was separated from her crew. She was surrounded and suffered a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating before being saved by a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers.
Many people feel that the attack on Logan -- which I think the evidence would call "gang rape" -- is only to be expected in a misogynistic, Islamic society. Others stress that this kind of behavior is barbaric, not culture-specific. Feminists point out that gang rape happens in nice white Christian societies, too. Female reporters say that rape is an occupational hazard for them.
One point I have not seen discussed is that rape is one of the things the United States paid the Mubarak regime for. Sexualized violence, rape, and even gang rape are not just signs of bestiality, barbarism, or boys inevitably being boys: they can be military and police tactics, and they are part of the toolbox of U.S. as well as Egyptian military/intelligence forces.
In my previous post about the Egyptian revolution, I quoted Paul Amar:
the Interior Ministry and the Central Security Services started outsourcing coercion to these baltagiya, paying them well and training them to use sexualized brutality (from groping to rape) in order to punish and deter female protesters and male detainees, alike.Emphasis is my own, to stress that rape is not actually something most men will do "naturally" or "instinctively": it is something that has to be taught or "modeled", especially if you're using it to make a directed political point or military tactic.
In Chapter 6 of The Dark Side, "Outsourcing Torture", Jane Mayer outlines how Mubarak's Intelligence Services (Mukhabarat) was the CIA's trusted ally when the U.S. wanted to torture someone without getting blood directly on American hands. This torture would include whatever might break a person, including -- maybe even especially including -- rape. The willingness of Egyptian Intelligence to use sexualized violence -- their tactical experience with rape -- was one of their skills, one of the things the U.S. bought with our military and foreign aid to Egypt (about $2B/year, almost all of it for military or "security" purposes).
Not that Americans can't do the job on their own. A fair amount of the reported prisoner abuse at both Abu Gharib and Guantanamo involved rape, object rape, or threats of rape. Here in the U.S., prison rape is notoriously common, and tolerated by prison officials and the justice system. Jokes about prison rape are common, and expressions of schadenfreude at the arrest of criminals often anticipate that the criminal will be raped as they "deserve". It's pretty clear to me that at least a substantial minority of Americans think rape is an appropriate deterrent or punishment for all sorts of crimes.
The U.S. military don't just use rape against prisoners or enemies, it also tolerates rape against its own personnel. This same week, as many Americans take the opportunity to castigate Egyptian or Muslim culture for its "barbaric" treatment of women, more than a dozen U.S. veterans who say they were raped or assaulted by comrades filed a class-action suit in federal court Tuesday attempting to force the Pentagon to change how it handles such cases.
The suit names Defense Secretary Robert Gates and his predecessor, Donald H. Rumsfeld. The plaintiffs say individual commanders have too much say in how allegations are handled and that they want reforms in the system.As I wrote when talking about rape culture in the military, when decent treatment depends entirely on the Commanding Officer, it proves that decent treatment is *not* policy: policy comes from higher-up and is enforced by military discipline. I'm certain that some US military units do not tolerate rape either inside or outside the unit, but it's also clear that some *do* -- which means that rape is available as a tactic, something a commander can tolerate or even encourage to get a desired result.
...
In one incident, an Army Reservist says two male colleagues raped her in Iraq and videotaped the attack. She complained to authorities after the men circulated the video to colleagues. Despite being bruised from her shoulders to elbows from being held down, she says charges weren't filed because the commander determined she "did not act like a rape victim" and "did not struggle enough" and authorities said they didn't want to delay the scheduled return of the alleged attackers to the United States.
To get back to Logan's case: the report says she was attacked by a *group*, not some random person, nor were they a mob or crowd -- in the sense of people who are complete strangers to each other. The people who attacked her had some sort of connection to each other, some association, though there's no telling right now what that association was or what political faction they were part of. But the toolbox of "things a group of Egyptians inclined to violence might easily do" definitely includes rape and sexual assault: this is something they have all heard of, something they might have done before or that might have been done to them. And the United States has helped make it that way.
Listen, this attitude prevails throughout the world, even in the United States, and well beyond the military. I once helped a friend run a public demonstration of her nop's self-defense program during a street fair, and more than one guy sneeringly said that there was no such thing as rape and that at some level and no matter what they said, women actually enjoyed it.
Posted by: debbie | February 18, 2011 at 01:35 PM
Good post. My head and heart thank you, even if my blood pressure does not.
It's not rape, it's 'regional stability'.
Posted by: nous | February 18, 2011 at 02:02 PM
Debbie:
... I have no idea what a "nop" is. Where the heck *was* this street fair? (gets out list of "places to avoid, or maybe overthrow")
Posted by: Doctor Science | February 18, 2011 at 02:08 PM
It's not rape, it's 'regional stability'.
I like that, in a total fncked-upedness sort of way.
Posted by: Ugh | February 18, 2011 at 02:47 PM
You should forward this post to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. With deflection this determined, they could ward off the next Cat 5 hurricane.
Posted by: Sanity Inspector | February 19, 2011 at 12:07 AM
I wonder what you think I am deflecting.
Posted by: Doctor Science | February 19, 2011 at 12:30 AM
Aw, jeez, I was not paying attention when I typed that. I meant NPO -- as in nonprofit organization. This was in Ohio, and it was a "Gallery Hop," an event we'd thought wouldn't be so "red"-blooded. What was really sad was that most of the remarks came from college students, which told me that this kind of attitude was not going to disappear very soon.
Posted by: debbie | February 19, 2011 at 08:54 AM
Dr. Science: in this case, an attempt to deflect the "argument" that she was assaulted because of the subhumanity of swarthy (Egyptian) muslims, thereby justifying their need for a "strongman" to keep them in line and make the Middle East safe for (a particular) democracy.
As opposed to tying the assault in with the other assaults against western journalists by the internal security forces working on behalf of the western-backed regime that runs Egypt.
Posted by: polyorchnid octopunch | February 19, 2011 at 12:10 PM
So not only is the reporter's rape the fault of the U.S., I'm racist for disagreeing? Pretty slick!
David Pryce-Jones' "The Closed Circle: An Interpretation of the Arabs" has a chapter on the not-as-complex-as-some-might-wish-to-believe status of women in those societies, including Egypt. Unaccompanied women are indeed at risk of attack there, as attested by Western female charity workers in Cairo's slums. As for the U.S., we took Egypt as we found it, when Sadat left the Soviet camp in the late 70s. Mubarak was the third (I almost said "last") of only three rulers of Egypt since 1952. Their lack of a democractic tradition is none of our doing. Indeed, whatever simulacrum of democracy Egypt comes up with, if they in fact do, will in no small part be inspired by their contact with us.
Posted by: Sanity Inspector | February 19, 2011 at 10:50 PM
SI, project much? I know, don't feed the trolls, but...
First, no one called you a racist. Then, DS's post is worded as a suggestion, the truth of which can't be known with certainty, yet you take it as an ironclad statement of sole US responsibility--which, even if DS's suggestion were completely true (and she/he never claims that), would not actually follow. DS mentions other hypotheses, including the it's-an-Arab-thing hypothesis that you're pitching. I don't see the fight you're trying to pick here.
If you want to avoid deflection, how about how explaining, how it's a good thing to have the US engage in rape, financially support regimes that engage in it, and arrange for those regimes to be US proxies in its commission.
Surely those policies have claimed innocent victims whether or not one of them is Logan.
While democracy is not really the issue here (nice try, though), I don't think you can say that Mubarak would have lasted *longer* in office had the US stopped funding him.
Posted by: nilibula | February 20, 2011 at 06:52 PM
Unaccompanied women are indeed at risk of attack there
Gosh. Thank heaven we don't live in a society with THAT problem.
Posted by: Hogan | February 21, 2011 at 04:41 PM
Posted by: Gary Farber | February 23, 2011 at 04:39 AM
Sorrow is hushed into peace in my heart like the evening among
Posted by: suhali leather | March 10, 2011 at 01:45 AM