by Eric Martin
Dick Cheney is still lying about Iraq's WMD. The ultimate dead-ender. In response to Karl Rove's claim that the Bush administration would not have pused for the invasion of Iraq had it known the reality of Iraq's WMD capacity:
Cheney said that the U.S. would have invaded regardless of whether or not Saddam Hussein possessed WMD because he retained the “capability to produce weapons of mass destruction“:
CHENEY: As I look at the intelligence with respect to Iraq, what they got wrong was that there weren’t any stockpiles. What they found was that Saddam Hussein still had the capability to produce weapons of mass destruction. He had the technology, he had the people, he had the basic feed stock.
First of all, using a country's "capability" to produce WMD at some later date as a casus belli is the thinnest of gruel. But here's the kicker: Cheney isn't even telling the truth about that.
Cheney appears to be confusing “capability” with “desire.” Indeed, in 2004, the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) — which searched Iraq for Hussein’s supposed WMD stockpiles — concluded in a 1,000 page report that Iraq “had the desire but not the capability to create weapons that could attack the west” at the time of the U.S. invasion. Additionally, the ISG confirmed that Iraq’s WMD capabilities were “essentially destroyed” in the 1991 Gulf War:
Saddam wanted to recreate Iraq’s WMD capability—which was essentially destroyed in 1991—after sanctions were removed and Iraq’s economy stabilized, but probably with a different mix of capabilities to that which previously existed. [emphasis added throughout]
When your mendacity can make Karl Rove look honest and forthright in comparison you've really accomplished something.
Dick Cheney is a national embarrassment.
UPDATE: Ilan Goldenberg and Spencer Ackerman have more of Cheney's most recent lies, relating to the putative return to the battlefield of released Gitmo detainees, as well as the intelligence gleaned from torturing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, respectively.
Nonsense. Iraq clearly had scientists. And it had technology comparable to that of 1950s America. And it had a crazy dictator. Ergo, mushroom cloud. The math is all there, plain as day.
Why, Saddam was just as big a threat to NYC as Syria or Ethiopia or Indonesia. How could we NOT invade? You're just mad because you secretly harbor a deep rooted support for the Ba'thist party. Also.
Posted by: Zifnab | December 17, 2008 at 12:39 PM
Cheney appears to be confusing “capability” with “desire.”
The entire Iraq invasion was another iteration of that mistake.
Posted by: Hogan | December 17, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Did Cheney specify if the intelligence "that Saddam Hussein still had the capability to produce weapons of mass destruction" was the intel gathered in the field or if it was the stuff his guys cooked up back in the office? I mean, he technically could have been telling the truth depending on the meaning of "intelligence." (Note: before blasting me as a Cheney fan, understand that my sarcasm level is particularly high today.)
Posted by: tomeck | December 17, 2008 at 12:56 PM
IRAQ had WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION RELATED PROGRAM ACTIVITIES.
Why did this phrase never break out? It perfectly encapsulates the dead-enders' backpedaling doublespeak.
Posted by: theo | December 17, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Hey I use "something-or-other program related activities" on a regular basis. Sometimes I even combine it with "the global war on something-or-other."
Posted by: radish | December 17, 2008 at 01:28 PM
In our house, we have a bottle of ammonia under the sink and a bottle of bleach in the basement next to the washing machine.
Voila--the capability of producing weapons of mass destruction!
Posted by: rea | December 17, 2008 at 01:36 PM
Is it just me, or does anyone else wonder if Cheney isn't suffering from kind of clinical mental impairment?
Dementia?
Paranoia?
Any of a variety of personality disorders?
I think the guy is either pathological or nuts. Just my two cents.
Thanks -
Posted by: russell | December 17, 2008 at 02:05 PM
Sociopath.
Posted by: Eric Martin | December 17, 2008 at 02:18 PM
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION RELATED PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
You know, lots of countries have WMD-related programs. It's not an international crime per sè. Most of these WMD-related programs aim at diminishing the threat posed by enemy WMDs. For example, the fact that Iraqi soldiers carried a gas mask in their combat gear was not a proof of the Iraqi intent to use WMDs. On the contrary, it is the standard practice of most militaries of the world. You never know when the enemy is going to use gas or bioagents. However, if your troops have NBC protection gear, the effectiveness of the chemical and bioagents will be reduced dramatically. Thus, your enemy may decide not to use his WMDs.
On the other hand, about every industrialized country has the "potential" to develop WMDs at a fast pace. Google, for instance, "bioarosol instrumentation". If you can produce bioaerosol instruments, you must calibrate them with aerosols that resemble the right thing very closely.
Posted by: Lurker | December 17, 2008 at 02:24 PM
Sad impotent clown who spends an hour each night in front a mirror pretending he's the President giving a speech announcing the nuclear destruction of a major American city by terrorists.
Posted by: modulo myself | December 17, 2008 at 02:41 PM
I.e., the logical extension of every white male in this country who ever used, in affirmation of its meaning, the phrase causus belli .
In the center of his head, incidentally, is a white room with buzzing lights, no furniture, and a hairless acephalic hermaphroditic body being crushed by a very large remote control.
Posted by: modulo myself | December 17, 2008 at 02:45 PM
Love him? Hate him? How do YOU feel about our soon to be former President? Take part in a chance to immortalize your views in book form by visiting http://goodbyegeorgew.com/ and letting your opinion be read!
Posted by: Kyle | December 17, 2008 at 02:48 PM
What's that old joke about the deputy who tried to take a woman in for fishing without a license (because she was in a boat with fishing equipment while she was reading a book) and the woman threatened to charge the deputy with rape because the guy had a penis.
Posted by: Madrocketscientist | December 17, 2008 at 03:00 PM
russell: is "Cheney...suffering from [some]kind of clinical mental impairment?"
I recommend reading Richard Hofstadter's "The Paranoid Style in American Politics." It gave me a great deal of insight when I read it in 1969, and thought of it when I considered the political landscape ever since.
Posted by: hoser | December 17, 2008 at 03:02 PM
I.e., the logical extension of every white male in this country who ever used, in affirmation of its meaning, the phrase causus belli.
Can't be that many then, as it's actually casus belli - sorry, couldn't resist.
Posted by: novakant | December 17, 2008 at 03:21 PM
i'd prefer a Cassis Bellini.
--
how strange that, when searching to see if that was already a drink, i find that i'm the #1 Google hit, having made the exact same joke, almost two years ago.
i guess that means i need to buy some peaches, champagne and creme de cassis.
Posted by: cleek | December 17, 2008 at 04:27 PM
Of course Iraq had WMD capability. It takes human beings to create such weapons, and they had human beings. So they obviously could create WMDs. Now that Iraq has fewer human beings, the threat is obviously reduced.
Posted by: fostert | December 17, 2008 at 05:02 PM
"Cheney...suffering from [some]kind of clinical mental impairment?
Google on "Cheney pumphead"....
Posted by: Davis X. Machina | December 17, 2008 at 09:42 PM
Am I the only one who finds Cheney's avuncular warmth to be utterly endearing?
Posted by: hairshirthedonist | December 17, 2008 at 10:15 PM
Given that one can purchase everything needed to culture botulin or anthrax at Wal-Mart for less than $500, color me less than impressed with Mr. Cheney's claims.
Posted by: BigHank53 | December 17, 2008 at 10:50 PM
I think Cheney's admissions about his connections to the torture are intended to stir up talk like that coming from Carl Levin now about investigations and possible charges, to force Bush to pardon him before time runs out.
Posted by: KCinDC | December 18, 2008 at 12:33 AM
And speaking of Cheney's waterboarding conversation, I mentioned to bedtimeforbonzo on the other thread Michael Smerconish's disgusting torture defense, which you may want to watch if you were under the impression that he was a civilized person.
Posted by: KCinDC | December 18, 2008 at 12:40 AM
rea, the ability to produce chlorine was cited as part of the threat of Saddam (Hey, it was used on the battlefield in WW1!). I doubt that there are many states that lack that ability (maybe the Vatican).
Posted by: Hartmut | December 18, 2008 at 04:13 AM
I doubt that there are many states that lack that ability (maybe the Vatican).
Also Monaco and the Isle of Man.
But Lichtenstein probably could.
Posted by: Jesurgislac | December 18, 2008 at 05:34 AM
Iraq possessed huge stores (desert) of mica, feldspar, and quartz which could have been readily converted into windhields for bomb carrying planes capable of delivering nuclear devices given to it by rogue scientists intent upon destroying Israel, and other countries in the region, and indeed, beyond.
Posted by: Porcupine_Pal | December 18, 2008 at 10:12 AM
We should really be tracking sales of these, not just to Iraq but to any and all hostile or failed states.
These too -- we need to put a stop to rogue particle physics research now!
Thanks -
Posted by: russell | December 18, 2008 at 11:23 AM
Is there any possibility of consigning the phrase "weapons of mass destruction" to the rubbish heap? Lumping mustard gas in with nuclear weapons muddies rather than clarifying, and lately people have been including plain high explosives, ordinary chemicals like chlorine, and even drugs like methamphetamine. When a country is supposedly on the verge of making WMDs, it makes a huge difference what exactly we're talking about.
Posted by: KCinDC | December 18, 2008 at 12:21 PM
The most effective weapons of mass destruction (given the number of victims) are likely the AK47 and the common (anti-personnel) landmine. Cars and alcohol (especially when combined) are even more murderous, although they are not usually considered weapons.
Posted by: Hartmut | December 18, 2008 at 02:11 PM
I doubt that there are many states that lack that ability
to produce chlorine, you need table salt, water, and electricity. as a bonus, you get sodium hydroxide and hydrogen.
Posted by: cleek | December 18, 2008 at 02:30 PM
But the electricity generating capability could have been removed without invasion. HCl on MnO2 or H2SO4 on NaCl* would have done the job of chlorine production without.
*Just imagine what could have happened, if an Iraqi had driven a car into an American city and poured sea water into the battery?
Posted by: Hartmut | December 18, 2008 at 03:06 PM
hairshirthedonist: Am I the only one who finds Cheney's avuncular warmth to be utterly endearing?
Been hitting the Cassis Bellini a little hard, have you, hsh?
KCinDC: I think Cheney's admissions about his connections to the torture are intended to stir up talk like that coming from Carl Levin now about investigations and possible charges, to force Bush to pardon him before time runs out.
That makes sense to me, as the only other explanation involves sociopathy. Not that they're mutually incompatible. He's always been the most out-and-out torture advocate in the current regime.
Posted by: Nell | December 18, 2008 at 03:30 PM
to produce chlorine, you need table salt, water, and electricity. as a bonus, you get sodium hydroxide and hydrogen.
Dude, having divulged that information, you are now officially considered to be a munition.
Thanks -
Posted by: russell | December 18, 2008 at 10:34 PM
Hartmut and Jesurgilac--I find it hard to beleive that they don't have both bleach and ammonia in the Vatican or Monaco--although Maybe the Isle of Man . . .
Posted by: rea | December 19, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Maybe, but do they have the means to deliver in sufficient quantities? To my knowledge the Vatican does not produce this stuff*.
Call again, when the pope goes nuclear ;-)
*caveat: the Vatican has (or had) shares in chemical companies (including one that produces contraceptives btw)
Posted by: Hartmut | December 19, 2008 at 06:30 AM
As it happens.
Example:
Etc.So, no, it's hardly just you, Russell.
If you read Jane Mayer, or listen to her talk, or read an interview with her, you'll see that she's discussed at some length, repeatedly, how affected Cheney was by the combination of being in the White House on September 11th, by the later false alarm going off that there had been a biological warfare attack on the White House, and that he himself had been personally contaminated, and was going to die, and by his subsequent insistence on reading daily raw intelligence, which featured a daily drum beat of (false) stories of about-to-happen attacks by WMDs.Posted by: Gary Farber | December 19, 2008 at 02:12 PM
Gary:
I recall Suskind in One Percent Doctrine also painting some of Cheney's actions as the result of real paranoia/trauma. FWIW.
Posted by: Eric Martin | December 19, 2008 at 02:25 PM
and by his subsequent insistence on reading daily raw intelligence, which featured a daily drum beat of (false) stories of about-to-happen attacks by WMDs.
Denethor meets palantir. Madness ensues.
Posted by: ThatLeftTurnInABQ | December 19, 2008 at 03:18 PM
Well summarised, TLTiABQ.
Posted by: Jesurgislac | December 20, 2008 at 08:51 AM
Apologies. Trying to post here.
Posted by: Jesurgislac | February 08, 2009 at 05:04 PM