by hilzoy
Today's rumors seem less speculative than most, so I'm going to break with normal practice and report them. First, the National Journal reports that Obama will make Peter Orszag to head up the Office of Management and Budget. Orszag is now at the Congressional Budget Office; I think he's very good.
Second, all sorts of places are reporting that Obama has decided to offer the job of Attorney General to Eric Holder, pending vetting. I don't know much about Holder, but I find this very encouraging -- not just for the position he takes, but for his forthrightness and lack of equivocation:
"Eric H. Holder Jr., Deputy Attorney General during the Clinton administration, asserted in a speech to the American Constitution Society (ACS) that the United States must reverse "the disastrous course" set by the Bush administration in the struggle against terrorism by closing the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, declaring without qualification that the U.S. does not torture people, ending the practice of transferring individuals involuntarily to countries that engage in torture and ceasing warrantless domestic surveillance."Our needlessly abusive and unlawful practices in the 'War on Terror' have diminished our standing in the world community and made us less, rather than more, safe," Holder told a packed room at the ACS 2008 Convention on Friday evening. "For the sake of our safety and security, and because it is the right thing to do, the next president must move immediately to reclaim America's standing in the world as a nation that cherishes and protects individual freedom and basic human rights.""
Amen.
I gather that the one controversial thing about Holder is his involvement in the pardon of Marc Rich, which is detailed here. I loathed that pardon. But as far as I can tell, Holder's role was as follows: he was called hours before Bush was to be sworn in, and was asked what he thought about a pardon, which (he was told) Ehud Barak strongly supported. He should have raised red flags, but didn't. It's unclear how much he knew about the case, or whether he knew that the phone call to him was a significant part of what little vetting of the pardon there was. (Obviously, it should not have been. That was part of the problem.)
This does not sound like a dealbreaker to me, especially since I suspect that in an Obama administration, people will not be asked to weigh in on pardons out of the blue on the night before he leaves office. Otherwise, he seems like a very impressive guy. Do any of the lawyers here know anything about him? If so, what?
IANAL, but I remember him perfectly well from the Clinton Administration, where I always read good reports about him in news/analysis coverage, for what it's worth. He helped prosecute John Jenrette during Abscam. Also Dan Rostenkowski. He was the holdover Acting Attorney General for Bush while Ashcroft was being confirmed, and Reagan appointed him a judge, so it's hard to see how the Republicans can complain about him, which won't stop some.
Posted by: Gary Farber | November 18, 2008 at 11:09 PM
Jeralyn is taking a dim view:
With more detail.Posted by: Gary Farber | November 18, 2008 at 11:24 PM
I think it was Jon Cohn who said that Orszag at CBO was a very good sign for efforts to fix the health care system, because he recognized how a universal system could keep high health care costs from devastating our economy. We didn't have that going for us in 1994.
I hope that OMB gives him a better opportunity to play this role and not a worse one.
Posted by: Neil the Ethical Werewolf | November 19, 2008 at 03:06 AM
I'd be curious to hear more about his representation of Chiquita, which is an awful, awful company.
Posted by: Matthew | November 19, 2008 at 10:12 AM
Obama hasn't even been sworn in and already the left has commenced the circular firing squad. I'm shocked to find out a big city US Attorney took a hard nosed stand in the war on drugs.
Look, I loathe the war on drugs and consider it a useless drain. But attacking a good, qualified, decent left wing AG candidate because while a US Attorney in Washington DC (which does have a drug problem and said problem - from the point of view of a US Attorney - presents a rather limited range of options) is about as helpful as telling a crack dealer to "get a job".
Christ, how sweet the discipline of the right looks sometimes.
Posted by: Bob | November 19, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Gary: … so it's hard to see how the Republicans can complain about him, which won't stop some.
Of course not. So far (that I have seen):
-Another Clinton administration retread.
-Marc Rich yes, but also involved in the pardons of FALN and Weathermen terrorists. Recall that Obama attacked Clinton in the primaries over these very pardons.
-Elian Gonzalez and his defense of those actions. (And Greg Craig represented Gonzalez senior during that mess.)
-Lobbyist for Global Crossing after it racked up all that debt and went bankrupt.
That was as of this morning. I haven't made the rounds this afternoon yet.
Hilzoy: But as far as I can tell, Holder's role was as follows: he was called hours before Bush was to be sworn in, and was asked what he thought about a pardon, which (he was told) Ehud Barak strongly supported.
Seems like there may be a bit more to it than that:
A forthcoming Congressional report on the last-minute pardons by President Bill Clinton says Deputy Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. was a ''willing participant in the plan to keep the Justice Department from knowing about and opposing'' a pardon for Marc Rich, the financier.
I haven't tried to dig up the actual report...
Posted by: OCSteve | November 19, 2008 at 12:58 PM
I haven't tried to dig up the actual report...
If you do, be sure to read the views of the minority members of the committee for different view of what happened. IIRC 90% of that report was a political hit job by House Republicans.
Posted by: Ugh | November 19, 2008 at 01:10 PM
OCSteve: Who is pure enough to be appointed AG? And I mean that sincerely. Who has the requisite education, background, temperament, etc AND no baggage - none - just a pure monument to progressive values?
Posted by: Bob | November 19, 2008 at 01:11 PM
Tom Daschle accepted Health and Human Services secretary.
Posted by: Coyote | November 19, 2008 at 01:15 PM
Oh yeah, I also saw is Arnold Schwarzenegger bein' discussed for Energy Sec. Spirits preserve us, I hope they're kidding.
Posted by: Coyote | November 19, 2008 at 01:18 PM
Somehow, I knew that Avedon Carol would ignore or downplay the Holder appointment -- it really messes up her "Obama is as bad as Bush" idiocy. I'm expecting others of the same mindset to do the same.
Posted by: Jeff | November 19, 2008 at 05:27 PM
On the other hand, how many Democratic administrations do we have to pick from? Experience is a good thing, right?
FOlks should throw up some alternatives...
Posted by: gwangung | November 19, 2008 at 06:01 PM
Marc Rich yes, but also involved in the pardons of FALN and Weathermen terrorists. Recall that Obama attacked Clinton in the primaries over these very pardons.
OCSteve, that's a hell of a stretch, considering Obama only mentioned them in the primaries to point out that Hillary's use of Bill Ayers as a guilt-by-association point of attack was fundamentally absurd.
Posted by: mightygodking | November 19, 2008 at 06:41 PM
OCSteve: there aren't all that many people whose work I'm willing to dismiss out of hand, but Dan Burton, the guy who chaired the committee that wrote that report, is one of them See here. (Short version: he headed the Congressional Vince Foster investigation. He reenacted the "murder" of Vince Foster using a pumpkin. He's just all-around nuts.)
Posted by: hilzoy | November 19, 2008 at 08:07 PM
Briefly reviewing some of the portions of the Rich pardon report that I was previously familiar with, the report pretty much slimes anyone who was associated with Rich's pardon that wasn't opposed to it.
Posted by: Ugh | November 19, 2008 at 09:14 PM