by publius
Take it away Senator McCain (via Swampland):
The United States Supreme Court yesterday rendered a decision which I think is one of the worst decisions in the history of this country. Sen. Graham and Sen. Lieberman and I had worked very hard to make sure that we didn't torture any prisoners, that we didn't mistreat them, that we abided by the Geneva Conventions, which applies to all prisoners.
That last part is a lie as this classic Steve Benen post explains.
He’s a maverick all right. He scares the hell out of me.
Posted by: OCSteve | June 13, 2008 at 05:49 PM
So Boumedienne is right up there with Plessy, Korematsu and Dred Scott huh? Glad to know where his priorities are.
Posted by: Incertus | June 13, 2008 at 06:01 PM
It is breathtaking.
Although maybe he just doesn't know many decisions...
(*ducks*)
Posted by: hilzoy | June 13, 2008 at 06:16 PM
Korematsu? Um, does he KNOW that case? Or is he just throwing it around just to impress people? 'Cause Korematsu was decided in favor of the government because the courts essentially deferred to the government's judgement....the exact opposite as they did here....
Posted by: gwangung | June 13, 2008 at 06:29 PM
I don't think he mentioned Korematsu by name, gwangung.
I would hope this would finally get reporters to realize that yes, there are dramatic differences between McCain and Obama on detainee issues, even if McCain claims he wants to close Guantanamo. Hell, Bush says he wants to close Guantanamo. If McCain is so opposed to legal rights for prisoners--what exactly was he intending to do with them after closing Guantanamo? Move them to the U.S., where habeas clearly applies to citizens and non-citizens alike? Send them all to a legal black hole in Bagram? Pass some administrative detention law? What?
As far as the Geneva Conventions applying: the only reason that all detainees--including captives in Afghanistan & accused Al Qaeda suspects--are now protected by Geneva is the Supreme Court's ruling in Hamdan, a ruling that McCain, Graham, & Lieberman tried to prevent from ever occuring with their opposition to habeas. And, of course, then McCain signed on to gut Common Article 3 for prisoners in non-military custody.
Posted by: Katherine | June 13, 2008 at 06:38 PM
"We are now going to have the courts flooded with so-called, quote, Habeas Corpus suits against the government..."
Posting Rules prohibit further comment.
Posted by: Pascal's bookie | June 13, 2008 at 08:27 PM
Incertus, don't forget Bush v. Gore in the Supreme Court Hall of Shame.
Posted by: John in Nashville | June 13, 2008 at 11:43 PM
John,
Bush v Gore would certainly be up there in my list of worst cases ever, but I don't know that it would make it in McCain's. I'd certainly understand if it didn't, given McCain's general lack of intellectual honesty.
Posted by: Incertus | June 14, 2008 at 09:07 AM