by hilzoy
The news from Burma gets more and more horrific:
(Image from the Washington Post.)
From the NYT:
"The top United States diplomat in Myanmar warned that the toll could rise to 100,000 if aid was not prompt. The French foreign minister, meanwhile, suggested invoking United Nations powers to force delivery of international relief supplies on the reluctant Burmese government.The Myanmar government has so far put its official tally of the deaths from the cyclone at 22,500, of which perhaps 40 percent were children. A further 41,000 people are missing, and up to 1 million people are estimated to have been left homeless. (...)
“The situation in the delta sounds more and more horrendous,” Reuters quoted her as saying. She said many people had died when the storm struck while they were sleeping, and they were either drowned or swept out to sea. Earlier in the day, the French foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner, said that the United Nations should invoke its “responsibility to protect” civilians as the basis for a resolution to allow the delivery of international aid even without the permission of the military junta.
Despite the emerging scale of the disaster, the Myanmar government has let in little aid and has restricted movement in the delta, aid agencies say. It has not granted visas to aid workers, even though supplies are being marshaled in nearby countries like Thailand. (...)
A United Nations official in Bangkok, Richard Horsey, said on Wednesday that “thousands of bodies” were floating in nearly 2,000 square miles of the flooded delta. And in the capital, Yangon, prices in the market were reported to be doubled for rice, cooking oil, charcoal and bottled water. Much of Yangon is reported to be without power, so residents could not use their pumps to obtain drinking water from wells."
AP:
"Local aid workers started distributing water purification tablets, mosquito nets, plastic sheeting and basic medical supplies.But heavily flooded areas were accessible only by boat, with helicopters unable to deliver relief supplies there, said Richard Horsey, Bangkok-based spokesman for the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Aid.
"Most urgent need is food and water," said Andrew Kirkwood, head of Save the Children in Yangon. "Many people are getting sick. The whole place is under salt water and there is nothing to drink. They can't use tablets to purify salt water," he said."
I listed some organizations who are getting aid to Burma in my last post on the subject. The NYT and Washington Post have more extensive lists.
Doctors Without Borders is already in the country, so may face fewer barriers than other NGOs.
Posted by: Doctor Science | May 07, 2008 at 10:02 PM
I wonder if the Burmese junta is going to swallow their pride and allow the US Navy to help out with relief. Seeing their track record, probably not, which is a real tragedy for the people suffering.
Posted by: LT Nixon | May 08, 2008 at 02:33 AM
Save The Children Fund is also in Burma already. So are Merlin, the Red Cross, and CARE. DEC have launched an appeal to help them but it is probably more feasible for people in the US to donate directly.
DEC
Posted by: jayann | May 08, 2008 at 09:18 AM
I have the feeling that now the Burmese army is getting all they want to eat.
Posted by: dbomp | May 08, 2008 at 11:27 AM
"I wonder if the Burmese junta is going to swallow their pride and allow the US Navy to help out with relief. Seeing their track record, probably not, which is a real tragedy for the people suffering."
I always find that when dealing with a troublesome friend, or acquaintance, or stranger, all problems are smoothed away as soon as I call a press conference to call the person "very paranoid."
That usually relaxes them, and makes all their concerns, however crazy, go away.
More people should try this technique, don't you think? It's so effective at achieving humanitarian ends.
But if you disagree, you're probably just very paranoid. See, don't you feel warmer towards me now?
Oh, wait, I forgot to call a press conference. Because it's most important, in diplomacy, to call people names in public. That's the key to truly effective diplomacy!
Posted by: Gary Farber | May 08, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Gary,
I don't understand what you are talking about. I'm sorry. I'm actually a terribly paranoid person, but I'm not a diplomat. Was there a press conference recently and was I there?
Posted by: LT Nixon | May 08, 2008 at 03:06 PM
Thanks to Doctor Science for the MsF link. From it:
There is a need for boats, the only way to reach many flooded areas. MsF is looking into buying them. In the face of a disaster of this scale, I hope our own government can be flexible about making resources available to other governments and organizations that are permitted in.
Posted by: Nell | May 08, 2008 at 03:30 PM
@LT Nixon:
The link you posted in your comment reports that the charge d'affaires at the U.S. embassy in Yangon referred to "the very paranoid regime" in a conference call to the press.
Gary was responding to that. I understood his point to be that the U.S. government is not doing all it could to avoid placing obstacles in the way of the Myanmar government's allowing foreign governments to provide aid.
Posted by: Nell | May 08, 2008 at 03:40 PM
Nell,
Thanks for the clarification!
Posted by: LT Nixon | May 08, 2008 at 03:58 PM
The satellite picture of flooded Burma could have been pulled right out of "An Inconvenient Truth."
Predictions are for more frequent, more intense storms which will affect the most vulnerable: poor people living in low-lying nations.
It will be instructive to see if the waters recede entirely, or if Burma has a new, globally warmed coastline.
Posted by: Mrs. Polly | May 08, 2008 at 05:30 PM
Not that Myanmar has a government you'd fall in love with but I get the feeling there is a beat up going on.
The embassy in Thailand was unfortunately closed do to a (Thai) holiday - so the visa issue was predictable. I guess the aid workers (and journalists) probably didn't think it through very well. And do the Americans really have to accompany the aid? can't they just send some trustworthy Thai?
Posted by: GNZ | May 09, 2008 at 07:06 AM
"I don't understand what you are talking about. I'm sorry"
I assumed you read the article you linked to and directed us to. Apologies for my error.
Posted by: Gary Farber | May 09, 2008 at 11:30 AM
At Daily Kos, a Burmese man in the U.S. reports on a channel of aid that may offer a way of circumventing the obstacles the Myanmar government is putting in the way of foreign governments and NGOs.
Checks can be made payable to:
The Myanmar American Medical Education Society, Inc.
MEMO: Emergency Relief Fund
and mailed to:
Myanmar American Medical Education Society
128 Mott Street, Suite 302
New York, NY 10013
The group is an
Posted by: Nell | May 09, 2008 at 04:03 PM
Ah, know we know what the holdup was. Must have taken a while to print the stickers to identify the foreign aid as coming from the Burmese government.
Posted by: Brett Bellmore | May 10, 2008 at 06:49 AM
A short op-ed by the Vice President of the Asia Society and PSA Co-Chair, Jamie Metzl on the situation in Burma....
"As you all know, the crisis in Burma is transforming from a natural disaster to a humanitarian catastrophe due to the xenophobia, incompetence, and malevolence of the Burmese government. With every day that passes, the situation of the up to tow million Burmese people affected by this crisis, almost three quarters of whom have reportedly not received any assistance, is becoming ever more precarious. It is clear that the time has come for bold international action. My colleague, Brian Vogt, wrote an excellent piece detailing one strategy for getting aid through to those who need it earlier this week. Brian is quite right to warn that we must not to allow our disgust for the Burmese junta lead us to political posturing rather than decisive action.
Although the Chinese government stated last week that they did not think it appropriate for the Burma crisis to be brought to the UN Security Council, it is becoming increasingly clear that stronger action by the UN and the international community will be required to break this deadly impasse. French Prime Minister Bernard Kouchner was among the first to call for aid drops in Burma, even against the wishes of the Burmese regime. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is now calling for a UN summit on aid to Burma. The United States must continue to take a lead in these efforts, and to build international consensus around a more aggressive assistance agenda with the greatest amount of international legitimacy possible. Clearly, food and aid drops will not be enough as water-borne diseases begin to take their toll over the coming days, particularly on the young and the elderly. Specifically, the United States can actively support the provision of assistance under chapter 7 of the UN Charter, as was done for Somalia and other recent humanitarian crises."
For more on Burma from PSA, please go to www.acrosstheaisle.org
Posted by: jessica | May 15, 2008 at 10:14 AM