« Fallon Resigns | Main | TR Speaks! »

March 12, 2008

Comments

For her next trick Clinton will try to appeal to Pennsylvania voters by making her own version of this ad.

I need help with my new web experiment. If you know Robert Ethan, you should hit the link below. If you spend anytime over at the Atlantic websites, you know who he is.

http://robertethanisatool.blogspot.com/

I am hoping to create a database of his amazing comments. He is the most commenter I know. (that is the grammar I intended).

Thanks to all. Please feel free to copy and link elsewhere. Let's build this up!! Don't worry, I am not trying to make any money on this. I just want to spread the gospel of Robert Ethan and his commenting empire to EVERYONE.

And if I were a black man and had wheels, I would be the first black male trolleycar ever, not to mention the first being ever to be both a public transit vehicle and a mammal. Aren't counterfactuals fun?

Brilliant mockery as always, hilzoy.

On a more serious note, though, I find this line of attack particularly rich coming from someone supporting, of all people, Hillary Clinton. If not for her to marriage to Bill, she'd probably be an anonymous corporate lawyer somewhere. Or maybe have gotten elected to the school board somewhere in Illinois, had she decided to run for public office. But to say that she'd be a serious contender for President, much less junior Senator from New York, if she weren't married to a former President, is ludicrous in the extreme. She's not remotely the most qualified person in the Democratic party based on her resume, nor was she remotely the most qualified Democrat to run for President this year. 90% of her candidacy is based on contingencies. Obama being black has undoubtedly helped him, but not as much as being Bill Clinton's wife has helped her.

Fun fact, from commenters at The Field: Obama's margin of victory in MS is about 4000 votes shy of Clinton's in TX.

Hilzoy, that trolleycar comment is pitch perfect. And truly inspired in a wacky 30 Rock sort of way.

The first Ferraro comment was a dog whistle. The one today was the dog attacking the owner. If she does not completely distance herself from this, there will be consequences that Clinton will not be able to control in the weeks ahead.

Referencing my earlier remark, I know that many folks around the web are down on Tina Fey these days, but 30 Rock is still the best show on any TV in this country.

Funny is funny. She is seriously funny. I defend and will never denounce her.

On a more serious note, though, I find this line of attack particularly rich coming from someone supporting, of all people, Hillary Clinton. If not for her to marriage to Bill, she'd probably be an anonymous corporate lawyer somewhere. Or maybe have gotten elected to the school board somewhere in Illinois, had she decided to run for public office. But to say that she'd be a serious contender for President, much less junior Senator from New York, if she weren't married to a former President, is ludicrous in the extreme.

Yuppers. All success is comprised of talent, hard work AND luck. A man who didn't work as hard as Obama would not gotten this far; a woman with less talent than Clinton would not have gotten as far either.

Folks get opportunities in life, and it's up to them to make the most of them. If Obama had fallen on his face in February---and he well could have---we wouldn't be talking about him now.

I should say: the trolleycar comment is a riff off a philosophy joke ("if my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a trolleycar." Told to illustrate certain properties of if/then statements in logic classes.)

Pretty much OT: I note with interest that Donna Rose, an impressive transgender activist, has switched from Clinton to Obama. Wish I knew more of the backstory on that one.

Man, not a very good day for the Clinton campaign. Funny how it's not the end of the world like it was for Obama last Tuesday. Because he's such a media darling.

... I shouldn't be so sarcastic. But the Ferraro comment actually really ticked me off. Well, her second one, anyway. Not pleased.

Now MS is 61/37...

It seems pretty clear that Clinton's race-baiting has been successfull in a way--she got the racist vote in MS. On MyDD of all places there is a poster that explains how much of her support came from Republicans who either can't stand the thought of Obama as President or think that Clinton is the weaker candidate.

I hope to god she doesn't get the noimination. The last thing we need is a candidate who is both unscrupulous and inept.

BTW, probably noted elsewhere, but in the final California count Obama picked up as many delegates as Clinton's small plus last Tuesday.

From CNN:
"Racism works in two different directions. I really think they're attacking me because I'm white. How's that?"

She told a FOX News interviewer, "I got up and the question was asked, 'Why do you think Barack Obama is in the place he is today" as the party's delegate front-runner?"

When faced with a hole, you do **NOT** dig it deeper. You especially do **NOT** go on GOP-TV to dig your hole.

Stupid, stupid Geraldine Ferraro.

(BTW, I believe it's statements like these that explains, to a large extent, blacks voting for Obama.)

The Black Male Trolleycar hypothesis was delightful, especially because it hit me afresh, as I didn't remember the antecedent hilzoy explains in the comments.

Mark Schmitt made an interesting suggestion on the Florida/Michigan issue recently: Obama should seat the existing Florida slate, contingent on a Michigan revote. The argument, as I recall, is that the 60-odd net delegates Obama would lose by seating the Florida slate would be at most half to a third of Obama's lead even including announced superdelegates, so he can afford to concede them. A revote in Florida would likely yield a closer margin, but the public - and the superdelegates - would probably see a large swing state, late in the campaign, going for Clinton; and the effect that would have on the narrative and on the undeclared superdelegates could be damaging to Obama. And you'll note that Clinton supporters don't like to talk about Michigan nearly so much as they do about Florida, as Michigan is less of a swing state and the Clinton-only ballots are more obviously indefensible.

Of course, Schmitt's post seemed to be predicated on the idea that some sort of revote or delegate-seating would occur. At present, the officials in both Florida and Michigan seem to be determined to prevent the former, and the latter seems improbable absent a deal. This behavior by the MI and FL officials strikes me as cutting off their noses to spite their faces; still, if it's a choice between Schmitt's proposal and nothing, rather than between Schmitt's proposal and both voting, the argument is weaker.

Assuming that Obama doesn't pick up any more delegates in Texas (as he might), by my count, Clinton gained 6 delegates in all on March 4th, all of which were rendered moot by Mississippi. If I've done the math right, Clinton picked up 203 delegates from the 4th through today, and Obama picked up 205.

I doubt that will be broadcast, or that any of the maps will be re-colored, to show that Obama actually "won" Texas.

If not for her to marriage to Bill, she'd probably be an anonymous corporate lawyer somewhere.

. . . which is, in turn, more or less what Germaine Greer said about her. This is the weirdest primary in my adult life.

If not for her to marriage to Bill, she'd probably be an anonymous corporate lawyer somewhere. Or maybe have gotten elected to the school board somewhere in Illinois, had she decided to run for public office. But to say that she'd be a serious contender for President, much less junior Senator from New York, if she weren't married to a former President, is ludicrous in the extreme.

Well, it's a good thing that sexism is so much more acceptable than racism. Oh, wait, no, this is of course based upon your knowledge of Hillary as a person.

I still rember how angry I was when Hillary had to more or less accept the name Clinton instead of the Rodham she preferred because of the political forces in Arkansas. Because in those days it was not really accepted that she wasn't the loyal little wife that most of the current commenters on ObWi describe her as.

She was quite active in student politics. From the introduction of her speech in 1969:

In addition to inviting Senator Brooke to speak to them this morning, the Class of '69 has expressed a desire to speak to them and for them at this morning's commencement. There was no debate so far as I could ascertain as to who their spokesman was to be -- Miss Hillary Rodham. Member of this graduating class, she is a major in political science and a candidate for the degree with honors. In four years she has combined academic ability with active service to the College, her junior year having served as a Vil Junior, and then as a member of Senate and during the past year as President of College Government and presiding officer of College Senate. She is also cheerful, good humored, good company, and a good friend to all of us and it is a great pleasure to present to this audience Miss Hillary Rodham.

She worked for several organisations that aided children's and women's rights. Children, education and healthcare have always been on her agenda and she has achieved quite a lot for those. She founded ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES, she did a lot to make HIPPY a succes (which is the kind of program I promote in the Netherlands too, for disadvantaged children).

Here is an article about her time in Arkansas.

At the time, census figures showed that fewer than 11 percent of Arkansans over age 25 had completed four years of college, well below the national average. Charged by her husband with leading a committee on education reform, Hillary Clinton sought to defuse tension over controversial changes and made a point of holding hearings in all 75 counties.

By all accounts, she was a success. "We've done elected the wrong Clinton," Dumas recalled one conservative lawmaker saying, after listening to Hillary Clinton report on the committee's findings. "She became a very popular person in her own right."

Still, there were opponents. Hillary Clinton recommended teacher testing, a proposal that pitted her against a natural ally of the Clintons: the teachers' union. But her approach - her willingness to hear out those with opposing views, ensuring that everyone felt involved in the process - helped her prevail, political observers said. In addition to testing, the Clintons managed to raise teacher salaries and push through new accreditation standards.

"She could have just left it alone," said Janine Parry, an associate professor of political science at the University of Arkansas. "But . . . she took on the toughest challenges that we had."

I think she could have started (or even continued) her own political career much earlier if she hadn't been married to Bill Clinton. I also think that people who say that they are swayed by how honest the Obama campaign is (incorrectly imho) could do better than falling back on repeating every smear, no matter how ludicrous, as long as it is negative for HRC. They would be more believable if they managed to judge both candidates with the same level of scrutiny.

I think that they both have very good qualities and area's where I'm not happy with them. If Obama becomes the nominee (and that seems to be likely) I'd be much happier if I felt that he was a known quantity, to be trusted warts and all. I still have trouble accepting that I can't get that level of intellectual honesty here. But a big portion of the readers here are intelligent and educated women and I am amazed how they not only let sexist remarks slip by, but even repeat them.

The comments to this entry are closed.