by hilzoy
From the Daily Mail:
"When a newly-hatched flamingo chick was abandoned by its mother and father, the search for surrogate parents did not take long.Carlos and Fernando, the only gays in the bird sanctuary, were the automatic choice. (...)
WWT spokeswoman Jane Waghorn said: "Fernando and Carlos are a same sex couple who have been known to steal other Flamingos' eggs by chasing them off their nest because they wanted to rear them themselves.
"They were rather good at sitting on eggs and hatching them so last week, when a nest was abandoned, it seemed like a good idea to make them surrogate parents.
Jane Waghorn added "They have really bonded with the chick and are very good at being protective parents - finally to one of their own.""
Aren't they gorgeous?
"The pair, who have been together for six years, can feed their chick without any female help, by producing milk in their throat. It will be two years before its sex is known. (...)Flamingos, although monogamous during breeding periods, usually find a different partner each year, making the enduring love of Carlos and Fernando all the more remarkable.
"They only have eyes for each other," said Nigel Jarrett, a keeper at Slimbridge.
"They will probably stay together for the rest of their lives.""
Mmmm...flamingo.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | May 22, 2007 at 09:13 PM
some things are prettier from a distance
Posted by: cleek | May 22, 2007 at 09:38 PM
That's sweet.
I wonder how Carlos and Fernando found each other. That is, I wonder what flamingo mating rituals are like: do they start by hanging out in groups and eventually find the one they like best, as albatrosses (and human teenagers) do?
Are there enough gay birds in a flock so that all the gay birds can find a partner? Or are they situationally gay: they fall in love with* a particular individual, and it doesn't matter what gender that individual is?
I wonder if they've stayed together monogamously precisely because no egg laying is involved. If a species is "programmed" to prefer genetic variation in producing offspring, then the act of laying eggs might trigger a chemical/behavioral cue to find someone else next time. No egg = no cue.
*I know some people dislike anthropomorphizing animals by ascribing what are considered "human emotions" to them. I've never agreed with that, because I've never understood why we have to think animals are incapable of such emotions.
The more I watch animals I've known best, the more obvious it is that animals do indeed have as full and complex an emotional range as humans.
What they think of their own emotions - whether they agonize over picking a partner, whether they wonder why they feel the way they do, whether they ever look back and think they'd've been happier with someone else; whether they romance each other throughout their partnership or create some equivalent to poems on the subject; what a mate-for-life animal thinks and feels if it loses its mate - that's something I'd really love to know.
Posted by: CaseyL | May 22, 2007 at 09:40 PM
CaseyL, you might find Bernd Heinrich's Mind of the Raven interesting. In this context, the following passage seems noteworthy:
"...I previously had one pair of ravens, two very large dominant brothers, who bonded and built a perfect nest, then fought viciously when one tried to mate with the other at egg-laying time, i.ee., just when the nest was finished. From this I deduced that the condition of the nest, rather than the condition of the female, is likely the cue for mating."
Posted by: Jim Parish | May 22, 2007 at 10:23 PM
Stealing eggs by chasing others off their nests! Oh My God! It's the Homosexual Agenda!
Posted by: Ara | May 22, 2007 at 10:53 PM
Let a buncha pink birds inna zoo, whadya expect?
Posted by: Anderson | May 22, 2007 at 10:58 PM
Do they speak Arabic?
Posted by: John Thullen | May 22, 2007 at 11:00 PM
Oh, I think they're just divine.
Posted by: godoggo | May 22, 2007 at 11:10 PM
Do they speak Arabic?
No that would be Aras not Flamingoes (those speak a Dutch dialect)
Posted by: Hartmut | May 23, 2007 at 03:19 AM
Belgians usually feel insulted if you say that Hartmut ;)
Caseyl: The article I linked to in my comment about this adoption says;
Posted by: dutchmarbel | May 23, 2007 at 05:00 AM
Belgians usually feel insulted if you say that Hartmut ;)
I am aware of that and could even consider that a bonus ;-)
Posted by: Hartmut | May 23, 2007 at 06:02 AM
Ah, Belgian flamingoes. No wonder.
Posted by: Anderson | May 23, 2007 at 09:35 AM
Thanks for bringing up Belgians. Now I'm craving a Leffe at twenty of ten in the morning.
Posted by: hairshirthedonist | May 23, 2007 at 09:42 AM
They really are the gayest birds imaginable, flamingos. Except, perhaps, for peacocks. Although penguins have that sterotypical fastidiousness down pat, at least in looks, and... but I digress.
I loved Sullivan's response to this story:
Posted by: Edward_ | May 23, 2007 at 12:14 PM
OT: Wolfowitz got dumped. I've been waiting for that one ever since he started blaming her, which, um, I didn't take as a sign of a flourishing relationship.
Posted by: hilzoy | May 23, 2007 at 12:43 PM
Good for Shaha Ali Reza.
Posted by: Jackmormon | May 23, 2007 at 12:51 PM
Wolfowitz got dumped. I've been waiting for that one ever since he started blaming her
"Meanwhile, a World Bank source told us Ali Riza may be returning to the bank's main Washington offices after Wolfowitz officially steps down."
Oh, good. So Wolfowitz didn't permanently wreck her career.
Posted by: Jesurgislac | May 23, 2007 at 01:01 PM
"Time to excommunicate Planet Earth?"
I think only the surface is sinful.
Posted by: rilkefan | May 23, 2007 at 01:16 PM
I think only the surface is sinful.
there's something unholy about the center, too - so i've heard.
maybe the mantle is worth saving.
Posted by: cleek | May 23, 2007 at 01:30 PM
I can see the right-wing blog headlines now:
"Faggot Flamingos Prey Upon Helpless Orphans!"
Posted by: Erasmussimo | May 23, 2007 at 01:33 PM
Their love is a threat to my marriage!
Posted by: jpe | May 23, 2007 at 01:48 PM
omg, jpe, you married a flamingo?
Posted by: Jesurgislac | May 23, 2007 at 01:59 PM
Interesting it was reported as straight news (ahem) in the Daily Mail. Not a newspaper normally sympathetic to the homosexual agenda, I'd have expected them to speculate about oestrogen impersonating compounds in the zoo's water, or the influence of nearby village people concerts. Times change, I guess.
Posted by: SimonK | May 23, 2007 at 04:11 PM
More traitorous acts at the Justice Department as these dreadful findings are reported:
More government departments in revolt against the President! The Islamofascists are everywhere!Posted by: Gary Farber | May 24, 2007 at 02:10 AM
The Daily Mail is as susceptible to romantic love between flamingos as anyone else, evidently.
Oh, apparently the military has fired three more Arabic translators for being gay...
Posted by: Jesurgislac | May 24, 2007 at 08:49 AM
Those flamingos are white. I had been led to believe that flamingos were pink.
j/k
Posted by: raj | May 24, 2007 at 09:27 AM
Oh, apparently the military has fired three more Arabic translators for being gay...
Maybe they can go to work for one of those gov't contractors at ten times the pay.
Posted by: raj | May 24, 2007 at 09:28 AM
Those flamingos are white. I had been led to believe that flamingos were pink.
It depends on their diet. There's a specific type of shrimp that imparts that hot-pink hue to flamingo feathers. If they're not being fed that shrimp (and they can be eating a perfectly good diet without it) their feathers fade to pale.
Posted by: CaseyL | May 24, 2007 at 11:08 AM
Hm, does that mean there is a correlation between eating shrimps and being gay? There is this fancy theory that pork makes gay. True Americans of course eat beef and catch BSE (b#ll sh#t esteem) unlike the sissy Europeans ;-).
Posted by: Hartmut | May 24, 2007 at 12:23 PM
Nono... pork makes delicious!
Posted by: Anarch | May 25, 2007 at 01:12 AM