by hilzoy
Via TPMMuckraker, The Hill:
"The FBI searched the Virginia home of Rep. John Doolittle (R-Calif.) last Friday in its investigation into ties between the congressman and his wife, Julie, and disgraced former lobbyist Jack Abramoff, according to law enforcement and other Congressional and K Street sources. (...)Doolittle came within three percentage points of losing his election in November after facing months of scrutiny over his relationship with Abramoff, who is in jail for an array of fraud, bribery and money-laundering charges. The lawmaker has denied any wrongdoing. (...)
Doolittle also has been under fire for paying his wife’s company, Sierra Dominion Financial Solutions, a 15 percent commission on all contributions that the company raised for Doolittle’s campaign committee and leadership PAC. Her only other clients were Abramoff’s former firm, Greenberg Traurig; Abramoff’s former restaurant Signatures; and the Korea-U.S. Exchange Council, which Ed Buckham, a former chief of staff to ex-Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), created. (...)
Doolittle also received contributions from indicted defense contractor Brent Wilkes and his associates, and investigators are probing whether those contributions are linked to any official action Doolittle took to help Wilkes’ company obtain millions of dollars in government earmarks.
Wilkes recently was indicted in connection with his investigation stemming from former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham’s (R-Calif.) bribery conviction and jailing."
Doolittle is Deputy Whip in the Republican Caucus, and sits on the House Appropriations Committee. He also seems like one of those points at which seemingly disparate scandals all converge. (TPMMuckraker has a summary of them here.) I wrote about one of them about a year ago, and summarized it his way:
"Julie Doolittle has no known fundraising experience. Her business, which was started right after her husband landed a seat on the appropriations committee, has no office, phone listing, or other employees. Whenever someone gives money to her husband's campaigns, however, if she claims a commission, 15% of that donation gets transferred from the campaign's accounts to Julie Doolittle and her husband, for their own personal use. See how easy?"
One of my favorite Doolittle snippets from the Abramoff investigation is this charming testimonial, from TPMMuckraker:
"An email obtained by TPMmuckraker and never before published provides perhaps the best example of a lobbyist hitting up his colleagues for donations to a friendly lawmaker. In it, one of Abramoff's lobbyists makes a strong pitch for contributions to Cochran in the midst of his 2002 re-election campaign because "Sen. Cochran's office [had] never said 'no'" to the Mississippi Choctaw -- the casino-owning tribe that was one of Abramoff's prime clients since the beginning of his lobbying career."[W]e have been hitting them up for projects almost everyday [sic] the last couple of months," Abramoff associate Todd Boulanger wrote of Cochran's office. The Choctaw tribe is one of the largest employers in Mississippi. (...)
"I know it's pricey," Boulanger concluded, "but nobody comes even close (except for Doolittle, maybe) to doing as much for our main clients as Senator Cochran."" (Emphasis added.)
May this FBI search be the first of many, and may they all be very, very productive.
More evidence, I guess, that the FBI is filled with America-hating leftofascist Democrats.
Posted by: JakeB | April 18, 2007 at 06:27 PM
The idea that 15% of your political fundraising goes directly into your wife's bank account is about as corrupt as it gets.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2007 at 06:45 PM
Not to be picky, but isn't it that you *hear* shoes drop, not see them? ;^)
Posted by: liberal japonicus | April 18, 2007 at 06:47 PM
LJ--
I will second the notion that it would be even better titled "Hark! Dropping Shoes!"
Posted by: JakeB | April 18, 2007 at 06:53 PM
I prefer to taste them drop
Posted by: sidereal | April 18, 2007 at 06:57 PM
May this FBI search be the first of many, and may they all be very, very productive.
I agree – get them all of either party. (Feinstein included of course.)
Posted by: OCSteve | April 18, 2007 at 07:14 PM
Those wonderful Democrats here are really cleaning up Congress...
Hypocrites are everywhere.
Posted by: bril | April 18, 2007 at 07:56 PM
"Hypocrites are everywhere."
Pesky hypocrites. When we populate that base on Mars, there will be hypocrites on Mars. I hope some of them are female hypocrites so the male hypocrites can practice hypocrisy so far away from home, just to keep their chops up.
Some hypocrites vacation on extravagant per diem.
Other hypocrites, the really competent variety, go to hypocrisy jail to have rough sex with the professional hypocrites. Then they write their memoirs, see the image Jesus in the prison oatmeal, and get their own cable show upon release.
Then they write a self-help manual, with DVD,
on how to fleece the amateur hypocrites among us.
There in only one human being who is not a hypocrite, and I don't know how he does it.
Posted by: John Thullen | April 18, 2007 at 08:53 PM
Bril: link please?
Posted by: Dan Miller | April 18, 2007 at 09:11 PM
I'm already tired of Bril and the selective outrage brigade.
Where were they when DeLay's Republicans were stealing everything that wasn't tied down?
Oh yeah, they were listening to Rush and Drudge soothingly tell them everything was OK. And now at the behest of those professional liars, they're rising to a level of outrage that ranks them somewhere between "spammer" and "concern troll" in relevance.
I suspect it's all about as reliable as the Pelosi plane lies. But if there's some truth behind the lies and spin, then the 240some politicians in the Democratic House caucus aren't all perfect saints. Who knew.
Posted by: theo | April 18, 2007 at 09:44 PM
Hypocrites are everywhere.
You know, there are lots of perks to holding federal office. People want to buy you lunch, people want to treat you to a night at the theater, people want to fly you to the Bahamas for a "fact finding" junket.
It's tough work, but someone's got to do it, I guess.
Maybe all of that should be shut down, so that nothing of value, in any form, can be transferred to any federal office holder. That would be fine by me.
Short of that, the bottom line is whether (a) the giving and receiving of perks exceeds the limits allowed by law, and (b) the giving and receiving of perks affects votes. If you have any evidence of either of the above regarding folks with a "D" after their name, we'd all love to see it, because we'd love to see those folks out on their well-funded behinds just as much as folks with "R"s.
Over to you, bril.
THanks -
Posted by: russell | April 18, 2007 at 10:05 PM
Hypocrites are everywhere.
ain't it funny how bril always shows up here complaining about Dems as soon as a Republican gets caught doing something ? i wonder if he's over on righty blogs complaining about corrupt Republicans whenever a Dem gets caught? nah... probably not.
so, no i guess it's not funny. but his "hypocrites!" schtick is kindof unintentionally amusing, to me.
Posted by: cleek | April 18, 2007 at 10:19 PM
"Not to be picky, but isn't it that you *hear* shoes drop, not see them? ;^)"
In light of the name of the Congressman involved, would he be able to talk to the dropping shoes, or is that only before they were turned from cows to leather?
Posted by: Dantheman | April 18, 2007 at 10:27 PM
So, the people in Doolittle's district knew that he and his wife were embezzling 15% of their campaign contributions, but they went ahead and re-elected him anyway.
And why not? They already knew he was a Republican.
Posted by: Newport 9 | April 19, 2007 at 03:27 AM
The import of the Cochran/Doolittle e-mail is lost on me -- what's the big deal?
Posted by: Anderson | April 19, 2007 at 04:37 PM
And may prosecution be swift and sure.
I've given up any hope that politics will become civil and productive, and am now willing to settle for just cleaning out the outright criminals.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | April 20, 2007 at 09:27 AM