by hilzoy
From the AP:
"The Army Corps of Engineers, rushing to meet President Bush's promise to protect New Orleans by the start of the 2006 hurricane season, installed defective flood-control pumps last year despite warnings from its own expert that the equipment would fail during a storm, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press."
Of course they did. Of course. By now, how could we expect anything better?
From an update:
"At the same time, the Corps, the White House and state officials were telling residents that it was safe to come back to New Orleans, which was devastated in August 2005 when Hurricane Katrina breached the city's floodwalls. (...)As for whether the city was as safe as the Corps claimed, Powell said: "We got through a hurricane season without a hurricane so we didn't have to answer that question."
But he said residents should not panic as the new hurricane season approaches. "The corps is working as fast it can to get the systems back up. The levee system is better than it has ever been," he said."
And hey: what possible reason could the people of New Orleans have not to trust them?
Whitman appeared twice in New York City after the September 11 attacks to inform New Yorkers that the toxins released by the attacks posed no threat to their health.[1] On September 18 the EPA released a report in which Whitman said, "Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C. that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink."
The contempt that this Administration holds for the people whose duty it is to protect is beyond breathtaking
Posted by: Ethel-to-Tilly | March 14, 2007 at 08:47 PM
With the news trumpeted this evening that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has confessed to masterminding 9/11, though no reporters were allowed in to see the proceedings at Gitmo, and there is no public record of how the confession was obtained, please let me express my complete skepticism that this was not coerced using techniques approved by the current AG and crew. And we know how reliable confessions obtained in this manner are.
Posted by: moe99 | March 15, 2007 at 12:29 AM
Here's the transcript of KSM's CSRT.
Worth reading. The whole thing's bizarre (See: repeated comparisons of self to George Washington). You can tell where they're redacting the allegations about torture and having made false confessions in CIA custody. (The tribunal president specifically asked about it.) He does make a series of confessions, though, that he says are not a result of duress, and which could well be true.
I may post on it eventually but it's bedtime now.
(Ramzi bin al Shibh and Abu Faraj al Libbi had CSRTs too, but didn't attend.)
Posted by: Katherine | March 15, 2007 at 03:08 AM
They wouldn't release KSM's CSRT just to get Gonzalez off the front page, would they? Nah.
Posted by: Ugh | March 15, 2007 at 08:14 AM
Paul at Wizbang! (NOLA local) pretty much owns the Army Corps of Engineers story. For a right-winger, he’s accessed blame where it needs to go from the beginning of this story. He has blame for everyone and all organizations, but saves most of it for the Corps and the Feds.
Specifically, he blames them for the bulk of the destruction. His entire archive on Katrina is worth a read – but if you only read one post read this one.
Posted by: OCSteve | March 15, 2007 at 09:46 AM
Ethel-to-Tilly:
Yes, the day after Whitman's proclamation (for which she has attempted repentance since leaving our employ), the Wall Street editorial page, that nest of anti-American hate merchants, extolled the statement as proof that the pulverized World Trade Center and the planes and the aerosoled people inhaled into the lungs of everyone in lower Manhatten posed no threat to health, and indeed all clean air regulations need to be reconsidered and, by the way, do we really need the EPA at all.
It was as if, in the eyes of the anti-government forces who defecate every day on to the editorial page of that pretty good newspaper, Al Qaeda had done America a service and maybe a little rhetorical cooperation between Osama Bin Laden and Paul Gigot could bring about the destruction of the true enemy of both: the U.S. Government.
I suspect when the third plane hit the Pentagon, there were Al Qaeda sympathasizers at the Journal who were wishing they were able to direct the plane into the Fish and Wildlife Service, thus furthering two revolutions.
Tangentially, Kevin Drum is discussing No Child Left Behind lately and via a link he lets Reed Hundt tell us about Bill Bennett and his refusal to help Hundt fund internet access to public schools. Bennett said he would most assuredly not do anything to improve public schools because he wanted them to fail so that they could be replaced by private and religious schools.
Who is the American Government's most dangerous enemy? Shouldn't we be scanning all packages and containers and air passenger lists for the real danger?
Posted by: John Thullen | March 15, 2007 at 10:32 AM
Incidentally, I notice Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's confession was in the active voice, as in, "I masterminded..."
... whereas Gonzalez' and Bush's confessions about the Justice Department cock-up were in the passive voice, as in "Mistakes were made."
One thing about torture: at least the confessions sound convincing.
Posted by: John Thullen | March 15, 2007 at 10:52 AM
Thanks for this post, hilzoy. With all due respect to Paul at Wizbang, Matt McBride at Fix the Pumps is the go to guy on this story.
Posted by: oyster | March 15, 2007 at 11:43 AM
Of course, the company involved in the work has some interesting connections and history.
From the story.
Posted by: Bernard Yomtov | March 15, 2007 at 11:58 AM
oyster: Thanks for that link.
Posted by: OCSteve | March 15, 2007 at 12:12 PM
oyster: yes, thanks. That was very interesting.
Posted by: hilzoy | March 15, 2007 at 12:57 PM
My wife and I just got back on Friday night from a week in NOLA. We wanted to visit friends who live up by Magazine and Tchoupitoulas, my wife had some business there, I've always wanted to visit the city, so off we went.
The areas right by the river and upriver from downtown, where middle class and more-than-middle class folks live, are generally fine. The areas that were hardest hit by Katrina, where less well to do folks live, remain, a year and a half later, devastated. In the lower ninth you can, still, go block after block and see one house in 20 occupied, if that. It's a moonscape.
I talked to a number of people who live in the lower ninth, Arabi, and other areas either downriver or closer to the lake. Folks that have their own resources are, some of them, rebuilding. They are, more or less, pioneers, and are often the only people around for a couple of blocks.
Folks that don't have the resources to rebuild are SOL. They're living in FEMA trailers, they're living someplace else in NOLA, or they're just not coming back.
Low end rents are gone. People who used to pay 300-400 bucks a month are now looking at rents double or triple that amount.
Bottom line: if you're poor, or even just a plain old lower middle class working stiff, and you live in the parts of the city where folks like you live, most likely you're screwed. Nobody's helping those folks out. If folks in those areas want to come back, the city will let them, and will maybe run a temporary electric pole out so they can turn on their lights. Other than that, they're basically on their own. No grocery stores, no restaurants, no local place to buy furniture, clothing, or gasoline. No services above and beyond electric and water, and the electric's just become available quite recently. No hospitals nearby. Nothing but you and a lot of demolished houses.
There are a lot of cities in this country that exist in defiance of the prevailing natural conditions. LA, Las Vegas, and Phoenix don't have enough of their own water to support a hundredth of their populations. San Francisco could drop into the sea any day. Nobody in their right mind should really be living in coastal Florida. If the New Madrid earthquake happened today, everything from St Louis to Memphis would be flattened. Nobody says folks that live in those places should just suck it up or move.
But for the folks in NO who live downriver or back by the lake, the more or less universal message from the city, state, and federal government has been don't call me, I'll call you, and good luck.
If anyone wants to know what it actually looks like when you render government ineffective, either through cronyism, corruption, general stupidity, or drowning in a bathtub, go to NOLA, take St Claude Ave from the quarter downriver over the canal, and take a look around. That's what it looks like.
Thanks -
Posted by: russell | March 18, 2007 at 09:39 PM