by publius
So after a night of heavy drinking, Hilzoy apparently got on the computer and started inviting random people to join Obsidian Wings (Justin Timberlake was on the email I received for some reason). So before she could revoke the offer, I accepted. And you people are now, for better or worse, stuck with me.
Seriously though, I want to thank Hilzoy for the very gracious offer to join a blog that I've long read and long admired. It's truly a honor, and I very much appreciate it. For those who don't know me, I'm "publius" and I have been the sole proprietor of the blog Legal Fiction for just over three years. I'll be joining the gang here until Hilzoy kicks me out.
So I just wanted to say hello to both the audience and my new co-bloggers.
So how 'bout that surge?
You mean you aren't Justin Timberlake? This puts everything in a whole new light ...
Anyways, as I said over at your blog, being grateful to us for the offer is like being grateful to us for being kind enough to take your vintage 60s Jag off your hands free of charge. Any time.
One thing, though: I made the offer on behalf of the whole collective, of which you are now, for better of for worse, a member. Von, Seb, and Andrew have the same vote I do.
Welcome!
Posted by: hilzoy | January 11, 2007 at 10:31 PM
all the talk about that other Latinate blogger today has left me with a bitter feeling towards Roman names... but, i'm sure i'll feel better in the morning.
welcome :)
Posted by: cleek | January 11, 2007 at 10:32 PM
So how 'bout that surge?
Much better since I had some TUMS, thanks for asking!
Oh, and welcome! *flings rose petals* welcome! to ObWi. I love a good soupcon of snark, and look forward to many lively posts.
Many thanks to hilzoy for recuiting you, and to you for falling for her blandishments.
Posted by: CaseyL | January 11, 2007 at 10:36 PM
Welcome! Also, I'm not sure if you were told, but it's custom for new frontpage posters to hand out presents to the commentariat.
Posted by: spartikus | January 11, 2007 at 10:36 PM
On reflection, "collective" might not be the best term for the bunch of us, since von, Seb, and Andrew are conservatives. The local slang is 'the Hive Mind'.
Posted by: hilzoy | January 11, 2007 at 10:38 PM
that's funny spartikus - i was told that it was the other way around. hmmm, already a bait and switch it seems
Posted by: publius | January 11, 2007 at 10:38 PM
Naah, publius; don't listen to spartikus: he pulls that "presents" bit on ALL the new frontpagers - all the ObWings regulars KNOW that the preferred gift from new members of the HiveMind is cash... we will be emailing you with PayPal details later... ;)
Seriously, welcome aboard!
Posted by: Jay C | January 11, 2007 at 10:43 PM
ObWi ... the *only* blog to feature the author of the Federalist Papers! Congrats!
Posted by: Anderson | January 11, 2007 at 10:43 PM
cool!
Posted by: Katherine | January 11, 2007 at 10:44 PM
Welcome.
Posted by: Bernard Yomtov | January 11, 2007 at 10:47 PM
20,000 in baghdad joined by 300,000 iraqis is not a minimal change. When shinseki wanted a larger occupation force, there were no iraqis fighting with us. Now there are, and that number grows and is more effective every month.
Congrats on the move, and this site is much more blackberry friendly...which is the only internet access I have st fort Riley. Apparently they ban the internet in Kansasl probably because you can get birth control info here.
Posted by: jrudkis | January 11, 2007 at 10:51 PM
Kewl! Someone else with a -us for a suffix! Should we form a caucus?
Posted by: liberal japonicus | January 11, 2007 at 10:54 PM
Dear everyone: I am trapped in a Chinese fortune cookie factory hotel with internet but alas no email, so I am going to use this space to send a cryptic message to publius. Namely:
sm1ct4hulhu
HOBISS
As one of my sister's stuffed animals once wrote: DontaskwhyIdontnowhy.
Posted by: hilzoy | January 11, 2007 at 11:03 PM
Darn: Chinese fortune cookie factory was supposed to have a strikethrough.
One of these days I will master html.
Posted by: hilzoy | January 11, 2007 at 11:04 PM
roger - the crow flies at midnight
Posted by: publius | January 11, 2007 at 11:04 PM
and so I guess this is the forum in which you will share your thoughts on the legality of Ted Kennedy's bill? I'm all eyes.
Posted by: grackel | January 11, 2007 at 11:35 PM
Also, I'm not sure if you were told, but it's custom for new frontpage posters to hand out presents to the commentariat.
That's entirely up to you, publius, but if you're desperately casting about for something festively packaged, I suggest that step one not be "Cut a hole in the box".
Posted by: Mary | January 11, 2007 at 11:48 PM
"I'll be joining the gang here until Hilzoy kicks me out"
or we drive you nuts. But you'll know that if you've read a few of our more energetic threads. (The honeymoon is usually two weeks - right, [name{s} suppressed]?)
Posted by: rilkefan | January 11, 2007 at 11:54 PM
yay
Posted by: a cornellian | January 12, 2007 at 12:09 AM
(about publius, not the surge)
Posted by: a cornellian | January 12, 2007 at 12:09 AM
welcome
Posted by: bob mcmanus | January 12, 2007 at 12:11 AM
byrningman where are you?
Posted by: kovarsky | January 12, 2007 at 12:45 AM
just to warn you, i've brought some rogues with me over here
Posted by: publius | January 12, 2007 at 12:46 AM
I find Surge to be a second-tier caffeinated beverage, but I've always liked your blog, so I will give it another chance on your recommendation.
Posted by: adam | January 12, 2007 at 12:52 AM
Oho! Good choice, hive mind, and welcome, publius!
Watch out for the kitten BTW. It might look harmless, but you definitely don't want to rub it the wrong way...
Posted by: radish | January 12, 2007 at 02:19 AM
Justin WOULD have taken your post, but he brought Hilzoy the same 'gift' in a box he featured on Saturday Night Live, and...
Oh, Publius. Not you too?
Posted by: Cat Brother | January 12, 2007 at 07:41 AM
Welcome aboard, publius. I look forward to discussing the finer points of the Federalist Papers with you. And don't listen to 'em about gifts. I have always considered my mere presence here gift enough to the commentariat.
Posted by: Andrew | January 12, 2007 at 08:01 AM
Welcome aboard!
Posted by: matttbastard | January 12, 2007 at 08:02 AM
all the talk about that other Latinate blogger today has left me with a bitter feeling towards Roman names
Atrios? Maybe not.
Anyway, welcome, publius! I confess I haven't spent much more time than the last couple of minutes reading your blog, but if hilzoy and Andrew and Sebastian and von all agree, then you must indeed be Mostly Harmless.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | January 12, 2007 at 08:29 AM
Welcome aboard publius!
On the other hand, I think we've finally restored the proper balance, where lawyer front-pagers outnumber laypersons.
Posted by: Dantheman | January 12, 2007 at 08:47 AM
hilzoy and publius, my two favorite internet writers on one blog. i think my head is going to explode.
re: surge, i'm more worried about what bush plans to do in syria and iran than the i am about the surge.
Posted by: a-train | January 12, 2007 at 09:05 AM
just to warn you, i've brought some rogues with me over here
Some surges are better than others...
Welcome publius. That's three lawyers in the hive mind now. Counting the number of lawyers in the commentariat it seems that the US really *is* a paradise for lawyers.
Posted by: dutchmarbel | January 12, 2007 at 09:07 AM
Counting the number of lawyers in the commentariat it seems that the US really *is* a paradise for lawyers.
Plus, when the levee breaks, you can use them to caulk the gaps.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | January 12, 2007 at 09:10 AM
Where am I?? This isn't Legal Fiction...
Posted by: Ethel-to-Tilly | January 12, 2007 at 09:11 AM
Something tells me I'm forever going to be the poster with the least education here. :)
Posted by: Andrew | January 12, 2007 at 09:12 AM
Since I left, Andrew, you might be right.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | January 12, 2007 at 09:17 AM
Lawyers aren't so much educated: it's more like we went to trade school -- think of it as HVAC repair.
Posted by: LizardBreath | January 12, 2007 at 09:21 AM
"it's more like we went to trade school -- think of it as HVAC repair."
except for the degree of specialization. Very few HVAC repair tech's specialize in one brand, yet nearly all lawyers specialize in one area of the law, and even in sub-specialities.
Also, lawyers don't get to charge extra for working nights and weekends, it comes with the job at most firms.
Posted by: Dantheman | January 12, 2007 at 09:35 AM
sm1ct4hulhu
HOBISS
Cthulhu ?
Cthulhu Circus!
Posted by: cleek | January 12, 2007 at 09:38 AM
lawyers don't get to charge extra for working nights and weekends
In fairness, neither do soldiers. ;)
Posted by: Andrew | January 12, 2007 at 09:42 AM
Welcome publius, should be fun.
Posted by: Ugh | January 12, 2007 at 09:57 AM
FWIW, this publius comes equipped with the American Footprints seal of bloggy approval.
There, that should put any skeptical minds at ease.
Posted by: Eric Martin | January 12, 2007 at 10:34 AM
"but if hilzoy and Andrew and Sebastian and von all agree, then you must indeed be Mostly Harmless."
I suspect when we all agree it isn't mostly harmless.
In a similar vein I think I would make a good co-dictator by unanimous consent with katherine. I mean until one of us strangled the other. :)
Posted by: Sebastian Holsclaw | January 12, 2007 at 10:44 AM
Who's this Serge fellow everyone's talking about?
Posted by: TP | January 12, 2007 at 10:48 AM
Namely:
sm1ct4hulhu
HOBISS
Alas, Hilzoy, at least one of us here knows what the first is, and can guess the second. Of course, I won't use it, but you might want to change it.
Posted by: double-plus-ungood | January 12, 2007 at 10:59 AM
FWIW, this publius comes equipped with the American Footprints seal of bloggy approval.
Thanks, Eric: now maybe publius can use his new Secret ObWi Blogpowers to change the blogroll link to your splendid site away from the now-sadly-many-months-obsolete "Liberals Against Terrorism", and update it so that we can all share AF, as we should?
Posted by: Jay C | January 12, 2007 at 11:28 AM
Um....lacking an open thread: WTF? And WTF?
Posted by: Slartibartfast | January 12, 2007 at 11:29 AM
Welcome, Publius.
Do not feed the kitten after midnight: it turns into a gremlin.
Posted by: Jesurgislac | January 12, 2007 at 11:38 AM
Slarti,
On your second WTF, anger at the Carter book is an issue I have seen brewing, both in the general circulation newspaper and especially in the weekly local Jewish newspaper. Not having read the book, I am unable to take a position between the persons who say Carter is saying Israel's treatment of Palestinians in the Occupied Territories is the equivalent of apartheid, and the rebuttal from Carter indicating that is not what the book says.
I am also curious what percentage of the Jewish employees of the Carter Center the 14 resignees make up, but that is not something I have seen anywhere.
Posted by: Dantheman | January 12, 2007 at 11:45 AM
Well, their names all look Jewish.
Kidding.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | January 12, 2007 at 11:54 AM
Slarti, on your first WTF, I am gobsmacked* that Republicans are asserting it's hypocritical for Pelosi to be the Congressional Representative for San Francisco. Or whatever it is that Pelosi's supposed to be being hypocritical about.
*Actually, I'm ungobsmacked, because this kind of reach looks like business as usual for Republicans, not something astonishing to go WTF** over.
**If archy were typing in the present day, would he go wtf wtf instead of wotthehell wotthehell?
Dantheman, on Slarti's second WTF, Carter is so far from being the first*** to point out that Israel's treatment of the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories parallels South African apartheid, that it would be better to say Carter was jumping on the bandwagon. But I haven't read Carter's book either.
***As Desmond Tutu spoke at a conference on Ending the Occupation held in Boston, Massachusetts five years ago:
Posted by: Jesurgislac | January 12, 2007 at 12:01 PM
Well, their names all look Jewish
yeah, i was just writing going something about that.... so i will.
the piece doesn't tell you explicitly that the people who quit are Jewish. but i don't recall many lists of 14 names in little minor-interest stories like this, so that kinda stands out. it's like nudge-nudge, just look at their names, nudge-nudge !
strange.
Posted by: cleek | January 12, 2007 at 12:04 PM
just to warn you, i've brought some rogues with me over here
Nice new digs, Mr. Publius... wouldn't want anything to... happen to them... things break, you know... happens everyday... sometimes the even spontaneously burst into flames. Sometimes people too. Scientific fact. Imagine that, one day your relaxing in your new digs and then poof! you're burnt to a crisp. Wouldn't want that to happen, now do we, Mr. Publius?
all the talk about that other Latinate blogger today has left me with a bitter feeling towards Roman names
I was born with a latinate name, buster, so I wouldn't throw any talk like that around, I might just have get Roman on your ass... uh... that didn't sound right. I think I might just go slink off somewhere in shame and embarrassment.
Huh, huh, huh... I said barrass.
Okay, enough foolin', don't want to embarrass (huh huh) Publius on his first day at the new place. I'll try to be good from now on.
Posted by: Kári Tulinius | January 12, 2007 at 12:05 PM
Jes,
Actually reading what I said would be useful. Especially the line which said "the rebuttal from Carter indicating that is not what the book says."
But of course, I have found that this is too much to expect from you on the subject of Israel, so I will pass on further discussion of this topic with you.
Posted by: Dantheman | January 12, 2007 at 12:10 PM
Actually, I'm ungobsmacked, because this kind of reach looks like business as usual for Republicans, not something astonishing to go WTF
Which is why I'm going WTF: because this is exactly the sort of thing you'd expect from the Culture of Corruption. I do hold out some hopes that this will be self-correcting, though, which is in itself a step up.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | January 12, 2007 at 12:10 PM
Dan: But of course, I have found that this is too much to expect from you on the subject of Israel
I cited a relevant speech by Desmond Tutu, Dan. You don't like it, don't read it.
Posted by: Jesurgislac | January 12, 2007 at 12:13 PM
Slarti: Which is why I'm going WTF: because this is exactly the sort of thing you'd expect from the Culture of Corruption.
Making wild accusations at Democratic politicians based on no facts? Well, yes. Hasn't been self-correcting so far, but...
Posted by: Jesurgislac | January 12, 2007 at 12:14 PM
Slarti: Which is why I'm going WTF: because this is exactly the sort of thing you'd expect from the Culture of Corruption.
Making wild accusations at Democratic politicians based on no facts? Well, yes. Hasn't been self-correcting so far, but...
Posted by: Jesurgislac | January 12, 2007 at 12:15 PM
Actually reading what I said would be useful
Still not taking, Dan.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | January 12, 2007 at 12:15 PM
What Jay C said. Cough. Updates to anachronistic blogroll URLs. Cough.
Posted by: Eric Martin | January 12, 2007 at 12:16 PM
Still not taking, Dan.
Still going for the Intentional Obscurity Prize, Slarti? Wasn't winning it four years in a row enough for you?
Posted by: Jesurgislac | January 12, 2007 at 12:20 PM
Hello from the audience. Helloooooo....
Posted by: ScottM | January 12, 2007 at 12:22 PM
OT[?!]: Bizarro World has a brand new graphic...which, if not for the blood, might have been okay.
Posted by: spartikus | January 12, 2007 at 12:24 PM
Excellent. So this particular publius will be reliable? We wouldn't want ObWi to get some cheap imported publius, only to discover that it runs poorly and cease to function altogether the moment the warranty expires.
Posted by: radish | January 12, 2007 at 12:32 PM
"I cited a relevant speech by Desmond Tutu, Dan."
On the subject of whether Carter believes his book equates Israel's treatment of the Palestinians to apratheid? Not really.
Posted by: Dantheman | January 12, 2007 at 12:49 PM
No worries radish, this publius makes the folks at JD Power and associates swoon.
Posted by: Eric Martin | January 12, 2007 at 12:49 PM
as a charter member of the ObWi Bar Association, California Branch & VP -- Long-Winded Legal Explanations, I extend my welcome.
Posted by: Francis | January 12, 2007 at 12:50 PM
Hi. And hello to thhe new commenters. too.
Posted by: lily | January 12, 2007 at 01:01 PM
I was born with a latinate name, buster, so I wouldn't throw any talk like that around, I might just have get Roman on your ass.
no need to worry. i'm all better today.
let's hear it for the Romans!
i bet they knew how to pacify a restless citizenry.
Posted by: cleek | January 12, 2007 at 01:22 PM
Decimation, occasionally. And a fanatical devotion to the Caesar.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | January 12, 2007 at 01:27 PM
Now, how much do you hate the Romans?
A lot.
Alright you're in.
Posted by: Ugh | January 12, 2007 at 01:28 PM
"Decimation, occasionally"
As far as I recall, that was for soldiers that had shown cowardice, not "a restless citizenry".
Today's soldiers just get scolded for laziness at NRO.
I think Carter's book's title is simply meant as a provocation. That he tacitly contradicts Clinton's account of the 2000 peace talks and appropriates Ross's maps while changing the titles is unfortunate.
Posted by: rilkefan | January 12, 2007 at 01:39 PM
Wilcommen, bienvenue, welcome!
Posted by: Anarch | January 12, 2007 at 01:46 PM
Decimation, occasionally. And a fanatical devotion to the Caesar.
On which note, actually, the HBO series "Rome" begins its new season this Sunday, I believe. I'm still unconvinced by a lot of the early-middle episodes in the first season -- the dramatic conceits they're using often grate clunkily, if that makes sense -- but the ending is solid and at points genuinely great. Plus, much nekkidness so you know it's family fun for all!
Posted by: Anarch | January 12, 2007 at 01:48 PM
On the subject of whether Carter believes his book equates Israel's treatment of the Palestinians to apratheid?
Very relevant, on the subject of whether it's appropriate to compare Israel's treatment of the Palestinians to South African apartheid.
See, that's the trouble with Slarti's obscure blogging technique: it's difficult to figure out who's on topic and who's threadjacking.
Posted by: Jesurgislac | January 12, 2007 at 01:51 PM
I, uh... have a Roman nose?
Welcome!
Posted by: Catsy | January 12, 2007 at 01:52 PM
I, uh... have a Roman nose?
oh great... now i'll have Big Mouth Strikes Again stuck in my head all day.
Posted by: cleek | January 12, 2007 at 01:59 PM
just to warn you, i've brought some rogues with me over here
Nonsense, some of us were here all along.
Posted by: Pooh | January 12, 2007 at 02:09 PM
as the flames rose...
Posted by: Eric Martin | January 12, 2007 at 02:37 PM
Speaking of the Moz ...
Posted by: Mary | January 12, 2007 at 02:48 PM
Wow...Eric Martin
You know what? I scrolled a little and didn't find an example, so:
congratulations, hilzoy. An inspired and educated choice, as obviously was the choice of Andrew, who I hope continues to at least visit. Publius is exactly the kind of voice that had made Obsidian Wings inexplicably endure as one of the best blogs.
Posted by: bob mcmanus | January 12, 2007 at 02:48 PM
I've disliked Morrissey since...well, there's only a few songs that the Smiths did that were tolerable; everything else is annoying, self-indulgent crap.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | January 12, 2007 at 02:51 PM
White Strong Arms Gitmo Lawyers ...Majikthise
A little personal interest in this story...
Posted by: bob mcmanus | January 12, 2007 at 03:05 PM
"See, that's the trouble with Slarti's obscure blogging technique: it's difficult to figure out who's on topic and who's threadjacking."
As a general rule, the person who is not sure is the person doing the threadjacking. The general rule is certainly true here.
Posted by: Dantheman | January 12, 2007 at 03:05 PM
"So how 'bout that surge?"
JFTR, check out Anthony Cordesman's brutal fisking of it at the NYT online. Rough.
Posted by: Jay C | January 12, 2007 at 03:09 PM
I haven't seen any hint of Carter backing down on the use of the word "apartheid"--he apparently has a chapter in the book detailing why he thinks it's appropriate. It is a common comparison--B'Tselem, the Israeli human rights organization, uses it. What Carter denies is that he is an antisemite.
I haven't read the book either. I have read Charles Enderlin's book "Shattered Dreams" and all sides seem at fault in his account. They came close to an agreement at Taba, in January 2001, but the Israelis pulled out because of the upcoming election. For his part, Arafat didn't try to take what he could at that point because he thought Bush Jr would be more friendly to Arabs (as Bush Sr. had been) and he thought he could get a better deal with Bush in place, and also because he didn't believe Sharon would win the election.
As for what Ross says, it looks a little different in the Enderlin book. On page 351 there's a summary of the Taba talks as typed by Miguel Moratinos and one of the remaining disagreements was that the Israelis interpreted the Clinton proposals as allowing for the annexation of settlement blocs including 80 percent of the settlers, with them keeping 6 percent of the West Bank, whereas the Palestinians were only willing to give up 3.1 percent and wanted a land swap as compensation.
One thing Ross doesn't mention is that Clinton blamed Arafat for the failure of the talks at Camp David in the summer of 2000, yet Shlomo Ben Ami (who agrees with Ross's position regarding what happened in December) says that Arafat was justified in rejecting the supposedly generous Camp David offer. Shlomo Ben Ami was part of the peace talks and became Israel's foreign minister in August 2000, so if he says Israel's offer was inadequate, it should carry some weight.
Shlomo Ben Ami's views on both the overall nature of the conflict and what happened in December 2000 are at--
http://www.democracynow.org/finkelstein-benami.shtml
(And yeah, I gotta dig up the scrap of paper in my office about how to make a weblink.)
Posted by: Donald Johnson | January 12, 2007 at 03:10 PM
And yeah, that probably belongs in a different thread. But people shouldn't bring up the I/P issue if they don't want a threadjack. I'll leave now.
Posted by: Donald Johnson | January 12, 2007 at 03:13 PM
Donald,
"I haven't seen any hint of Carter backing down on the use of the word "apartheid"--he apparently has a chapter in the book detailing why he thinks it's appropriate."
My understanding (from newspaper articles only) is that he makes the comparison and gives reasons both why it is and is not accurate. The fact that he made the comparison at all is making some in the Jewish community outraged, while others think there is some justification for it, but that the differences are more important than the similarities, and still others entirely agree with it. That's why I said I would like to see the percentage of Jews within the organization who resigned.
"It is a common comparison--B'Tselem, the Israeli human rights organization, uses it."
No argument as to the frequency of the comparison being made. No interest in a discussion here as to its correctness.
Posted by: Dantheman | January 12, 2007 at 03:19 PM
Dantheman: As a general rule, the person who is not sure is the person doing the threadjacking.
Fine: have it your way. I threadjacked Slarti's threadjack. Can we have an Open Thread now? (Hey, Publius: it's an old Obsidian Wings tradition that a new denizen of the Hive Mind buys all the regulars a drink when they open their first Open Thread.)
Posted by: Jesurgislac | January 12, 2007 at 03:41 PM
Is it possible to become a regular, like, today, um, or right now? I just love free drinks.
Posted by: hairshirthedonist | January 12, 2007 at 04:29 PM
welcome, new commenters!
Posted by: hilzoy | January 12, 2007 at 05:54 PM
Welcome, publius!
jrudkis: there were no iraqis fighting with us. Now there are, and that number grows and is more effective every month.
Yes, more effective every month, in shrinking the Sunni neighborhoods and expanding the Shiite ones. Inspiring.
Posted by: Nell | January 13, 2007 at 11:32 AM
"Something tells me I'm forever going to be the poster with the least education here. :)"
Tell it to the guy with less than half a year of college.
I'd welcome publius, but, really, the true welcome won't come until I'm making points about grammar and punctuation.
Posted by: Gary Farber | January 13, 2007 at 12:03 PM
"Something tells me I'm forever going to be the poster with the least education here ;)"
Don't worry, Andrew, when you return from Iraq, you'll be vastly overqualified.
Welcome, Publius.
You too, Gary. ;)
Posted by: John Thullen | January 13, 2007 at 02:04 PM
OMG! WTH! Clear the decks! Stop the presses! The Obsidian Wings blogroll has finally been updated!
Happy Happy! Joy Joy!
And thanks to hilzoy, or the kitten, or whoever's efforts have made this hithertofore unimaginable thing posssible!
Huzzah!
Posted by: Jay C | January 14, 2007 at 01:27 PM
Oh and Nell im the 13 year old girl that pays attention in class your never the one with the least education. I have a Question to the longtime bloggers How come in my class they never talk about the truth in the crusades all though they dwell on the holocaust many jewish people were harmed in the crusades but it doesnt seemed mentioned.
Posted by: Amanda | June 24, 2007 at 01:06 AM