by hilzoy
Over at TPM, I read that the FBI had given Jack Abramoff his own desk. Stupidly, I interpreted this to mean something like 'The news division has given City Hall its own desk', or 'the State Department has given Central Asia its own desk': i.e., they had assigned a whole person or unit to do nothing but Abramoff. And I wondered: gosh, they hadn't done that before?, and moved on.
Silly me. From USNews:
"Jack Abramoff, the lobbying scandal figure, has become such a chatty rat that probe insiders say he's been given a desk to work at in the FBI. We're told he spends up to four hours a day detailing his shady business to agents eager to nail more congressmen in the scandal. And when cooperative witnesses spend that much time inside, they get a desk. As a result of his help in the ever expanding investigation, we hear that the Feds hope to keep him in a nearby prison after he's sentenced on his conspiracy admission."
Now that's more like it! I hope he details every single illegal act he has ever heard of in minute detail. And I hope he has a very, very good memory.
For what it's worth, I'm not normally nearly this gleeful about people going to jail. But people who sell out their public offices are, in my opinion, aiming daggers at the heart of our system of government, and I feel about them the way I feel about the person I heard about a few decades ago, who used to fake a heart attack, and then when some helpful person had taken him into his or her home while calling for help, would rob that person at gunpoint. Robbery is bad, I thought, but robbing people while making it impossible for people with actual heart attacks to get help, and destroying the kind of basic trust between citizens that makes decent life possible, is utterly beneath contempt. I don't feel this way about public servants who turn out to have made some sort of comprehensible accounting error (although why anyone in public life doesn't just pay for everything that isn't obviously a work-related expense is beyond me.) But people who take bribes: I insert their names into prison blues songs and pound them out on my guitar with a special malicious glint in my eye.
(And yes, that includes Democrats. If, as seems likely, he is found guilty, I hope William Jefferson gets to reflect on his sins at length in our federal penitentiaries.)
On another note, I am thrilled that Spencer Ackerman, otherwise known as "the only reason I didn't cancel my subscription to TNR ages ago", has joined the Prospect staff and TAPPED. What with the likes of Ezra and Scott Lemieux and praktike and Charles "where has your prose been all my life?" Pierce, TAPPED is turning into one of the seven wonders of the modern world. Or something like that. Maybe the mot juste will occur to me while I'm off cancelling my TNR subscription. Heh heh.
Pierce *is* good, isn't he?
Posted by: Anderson | October 23, 2006 at 05:11 PM
That does seem to indicate more shoes shopping in the future. The question is how many special elections we'll be needing in 2007 to replace members of Congress who win in November but find themselves resigning later.
Posted by: KCinDC | October 23, 2006 at 05:34 PM
Also, as long as I'm in election mode, I wonder whether any of November's gubernatorial elections will end up determining the party of an appointed replacement senator as well.
Posted by: KCinDC | October 23, 2006 at 05:40 PM
Anderson: it's his little throwaway phrases that get me -- Joe Klein's The most interesting passage scrawled on the cover of Joe's Social Studies notebook of the mind..., or the description of Peggy as "one of my favorite Papalettes" and "the mumbling dowager empress of the Reagan Revolution", in one short post, and so on.
But I also love this about him: I would bet money that he is the product of a Good Catholic Education, and as such refuses to be intimidated by religious charlatans. He knows the real stuff, so why should he be? See, for instance, here.
Which is why, when he dismisses an anti-evolutionists's views as "precisely the same as putting someone in front of a camera who blames the 9/11 attacks on winged insects from the planet Zaftron. This is the kind of thing you change tables to avoid" -- it's generally pretty clear that he's not anti-religious; just anti-fakery.
Posted by: hilzoy | October 23, 2006 at 05:44 PM
Screwed up grammer. Peggy Noonan; Joe Klein.
Posted by: hilzoy | October 23, 2006 at 05:45 PM
Maybe the mot juste will occur to me while I'm off cancelling my TNR subscription. Heh heh.
Sprezzatura?
Posted by: liberal japonicus | October 23, 2006 at 06:28 PM
praktite's now at TAPPED?
Posted by: matttbastard | October 23, 2006 at 06:38 PM
Yeah, his real name is Black Hellhound. Something like that, at least.
Posted by: Jackmormon | October 23, 2006 at 07:03 PM
Ah, Blake Hounshell. Thanks, JM.
Posted by: matttbastard | October 23, 2006 at 07:19 PM
Oh, and if that information is superdoublesecret secrecy, feel free to delete my previous comment.
Posted by: matttbastard | October 23, 2006 at 07:39 PM
I think he's effectively come out to the world now; I was just being silly.
Posted by: Jackmormon | October 23, 2006 at 07:55 PM
Ah, good. Since zuzu has recently been forced to take an indefinite hiatus from blogging thanks to an (implicit) outing threat/potential defamation suit, I'm a bit on edge when it comes to respecting pseudonymity.
Posted by: matttbastard | October 23, 2006 at 08:23 PM
yeah, Pierce has a way with invective. It sometimes sounds like a Southern thing to me (don't know if he is or not), the way that some of Twain's characters can work themselves up into a foot-stomping, technicolor rant, mixing the hi-falutin' irony with the low-down put-down. A joy to read, indeed--I only wish these were not such target-ripe times.
Posted by: kid bitzer | October 23, 2006 at 08:36 PM
kid b: I don't know where Pierce grew up, but he spent a bunch of time in Boston working for the Globe, and as a Boston girl, I can absolutely tell.
Posted by: hilzoy | October 23, 2006 at 08:55 PM
oh. yeah.
Well, you know Twain lived in Hartford, CT, too.
(irrelevant, I know, but I'm trying to cover).
Posted by: kid bitzer | October 23, 2006 at 09:33 PM
Southern Boston, I'm sure. ;^)
Posted by: liberal japonicus | October 23, 2006 at 10:14 PM
lj: I take it you don't know Southie all that well...
(What it has become during the last decade or so I have no idea, but it was a very proud, very insular Irish neighborhood, with a profound, and partly justified, sense of grievance. (Justified because it was quite poor, and it felt needlessly overlooked when liberals got all concerned about black poverty in the 60s.) It had always had its own institutions, and (importantly) its own schools, which it kept deliberately segregated. And people from Southie, notably the odious Louise Day Hicks, ran the school board and equally deliberately kept the schools segregated, horribly underfunded the black schools, and resisted any attempts at some sort of compromise or voluntary effort at desegregation.
(Always worth remembering when thinking about forced busing: it was no one's first choice, and in Boston at least, was forced on the city by the blatant unwillingness of Boston's elected officials to even minimally enforce the laws.)
Southie was where the worst of the busing violence took place. Here's a good description (and the book it's taken from, All Souls, is wonderful, in a horrifying, elegiac way. It's about Southie, not primarily about the busing stuff.) Anyways:
The picture I linked to up at the top of this comment is of a black lawyer getting beaten up with an American flag.
This was the backdrop of my adolescence, although, predictably to people from Southie, I was safely tucked away in private school.
Posted by: hilzoy | October 23, 2006 at 10:52 PM
Just a riff off of the 'Southern' thing by kid bitzer (which, btw, is a play on kibitzer?) Anyway, any joke you have to explain isn't a good one, so I'll let the headliner take the stage now.
Posted by: liberal japonicus | October 23, 2006 at 11:00 PM