by von
ONCE AGAIN, the time has come for an open thread. And a pretentious one at that. As y'all know, there is only one way to begin such a thing. So: Read on, unbeliever. You need not fail. (But I repeat myself.)
O.K., fine. I'll start.
The best speech ever made up by anyone and put into the mouth of an unwilling historical figure is, without question, Pericles' Funeral Oration (says I without fear of contradiction):
Most of those who have spoken here before me have commended the lawgiver who added this oration to our other funeral customs. It seemed to them a worthy thing that such an honor should be given at their burial to the dead who have fallen on the field of battle. But I should have preferred that, when men's deeds have been brave, they should be honored in deed only, and with such an honor as this public funeral, which you are now witnessing. Then the reputation of many would not have been imperiled on the eloquence or want of eloquence of one, and their virtues believed or not as he spoke well or ill. For it is difficult to say neither too little nor too much; and even moderation is apt not to give the impression of truthfulness. The friend of the dead who knows the facts is likely to think that the words of the speaker fall short of his knowledge and of his wishes; another who is not so well informed, when he hears of anything which surpasses his own powers, will be envious and will suspect exaggeration. Mankind are tolerant of the praises of others so long as each hearer thinks that he can do as well or nearly as well himself, but, when the speaker rises above him, jealousy is aroused and he begins to be incredulous. However, since our ancestors have set the seal of their approval upon the practice, I must obey, and to the utmost of my power shall endeavor to satisfy the wishes and beliefs of all who hear me.
I will speak first of our ancestors, for it is right and seemly that now, when we are lamenting the dead, a tribute should be paid to their memory. There has never been a time when they did not inhabit this land, which by their valor they will have handed down from generation to generation, and we have received from them a free state. But if they were worthy of praise, still more were our fathers, who added to their inheritance, and after many a struggle transmitted to us their sons this great empire. ....
. . . . Our form of government does not enter into rivalry with the institutions of others. Our government does not copy our neighbors', but is an example to them. It is true that we are called a democracy, for the administration is in the hands of the many and not of the few. But while there exists equal justice to all and alike in their private disputes, the claim of excellence is also recognized; and when a citizen is in any way distinguished, he is preferred to the public service, not as a matter of privilege, but as the reward of merit. Neither is poverty an obstacle, but a man may benefit his country whatever the obscurity of his condition. There is no exclusiveness in our public life, and in our private business we are not suspicious of one another, nor angry with our neighbor if he does what he likes; we do not put on sour looks at him which, though harmless, are not pleasant. While we are thus unconstrained in our private business, a spirit of reverence pervades our public acts; we are prevented from doing wrong by respect for the authorities and for the laws, having a particular regard to those which are ordained for the protection of the injured as well as those unwritten laws which bring upon the transgressor of them the reprobation of the general sentiment.
And we have not forgotten to provide for our weary spirits many relaxations from toil; we have regular games and sacrifices throughout the year; our homes are beautiful and elegant; and the delight which we daily feel in all these things helps to banish sorrow. Because of the greatness of our city the fruits of the whole earth flow in upon us; so that we enjoy the goods of other countries as freely as our own.
.... Our city is thrown open to the world, though and we never expel a foreigner and prevent him from seeing or learning anything of which the secret if revealed to an enemy might profit him. We rely not upon management or trickery, but upon our own hearts and hands. And in the matter of education, whereas they from early youth are always undergoing laborious exercises which are to make them brave, we live at ease, and yet are equally ready to face the perils which they face. ....
If then we prefer to meet danger with a light heart but without laborious training, and with a courage which is gained by habit and not enforced by law, are we not greatly the better for it? Since we do not anticipate the pain, although, when the hour comes, we can be as brave as those who never allow themselves to rest; thus our city is equally admirable in peace and in war. For we are lovers of the beautiful in our tastes and our strength lies, in our opinion, not in deliberation and discussion, but that knowledge which is gained by discussion preparatory to action. For we have a peculiar power of thinking before we act, and of acting, too, whereas other men are courageous from ignorance but hesitate upon reflection. ....
There are some who say that there are four organic laws of the United States: The Declaration of Independence; The Articles of Confederation; The Northwest Ordinance (why am I always forgotten?); and The Constitution itself. I've always thought there was a fifth, pointing the way -- and, bizarrely enough, attributed to a long dead Greek guy.
Open thread to your heart's content.
I've always liked that quote, although I seem always to have misattributed it. Thanks for the full cite, von.
Posted by: Jackmormon | June 20, 2006 at 12:53 AM
"ONCE AGAIN, the time has come for an open thread."
What, every other post?
I kinda think that it would have been better back a few weeks ago, when there were no open threads for two weeks at a time, rather than have one with only one other post between it and the last one, and that only four after the last one. That makes three open threads total on the sidebar now, and already people have been clearly indecisive about where to post.
But, hey, your blog.
Posted by: Gary Farber | June 20, 2006 at 03:36 AM
Well, you know, a reading of the entire book may show that Athens were the bad guys, and the speech not a listing of virtues, but of vices. Thucydides was a very conservative writer. Or maybe the larger point, helped by Xenophon's & Herodotus work on Sparta, is that those Greeks were free: That human nature is terrifyingly malleable clay.
Sparta has gotten a bad rap, and is no longer as favored as it was even 200 years ago. The book, the story, the tragedy and Glory of Greece is what inspired and terrified the founders, that made them fear democracy.
I am too tired for this argument.
...
Why am I up at 4 AM? Cause I was clicking around and TCM were showing their documentaries on Clara Bow and Louise Brooks back to back. Nuff said?
Posted by: bob mcmanus | June 20, 2006 at 05:12 AM
That man over there say
a woman needs to be helped into carriages
and lifted over ditches
and to have the best place everywhere.
Nobody ever helped me into carriages
or over mud puddles
or gives me a best place. . .
And ain't I a woman?
Look at me
Look at my arm!
I have plowed and planted
and gathered into barns
and no man could head me. . .
And ain't I a woman?
I could work as much
and eat as much as a man--
when I could get to it--
and bear the lash as well
and ain't I a woman?
I have born 13 children
and seen most all sold into slavery
and when I cried out a mother's grief
none but Jesus heard me. . .
and ain't I a woman?
that little man in black there say
a woman can't have as much rights as a man
cause Christ wasn't a woman
Where did your Christ come from?
From God and a woman!
Man had nothing to do with him!
If the first woman God ever made
was strong enough to turn the world
upside down, all alone
together women ought to be able to turn it
rightside up again.
Well, it's an open thread, why not cite one of your homegrown great orators?
Posted by: Jesurgislac | June 20, 2006 at 09:03 AM
why not cite one of your homegrown great orators?
because there aren't any, in any of the towns i call 'home'.
about the best i can do is Dave LaPoint (baseball player): "I don't know how anyone can put on a uniform and not care about winning."
or (composer, producer) Teo Macero: "So he [Miles Davis] sends me the tape, I listen to it, and I say, "Oh yeah, maybe we can stick that in here." And there were a lot of times in my career with Miles that I would do that. Put the cassette right from the stage into the Master tape. And we did a lot of electronic effects when we did Sketches of Spain. I mean if you listen to it very carefully you'll hear that in one spot on the record the band comes up center and splits, goes around and comes up again. We had all kinds of boxes and one engineer would be monitoring one box and I'll be monitoring the other to make this effect. I mean not many people really have heard that record the way it should be. But they've put it back out again. CBS and the Miles Davis collection. And it's not the same. I mean there was a wealth of love to make this music boil."
Posted by: cleek | June 20, 2006 at 09:31 AM
gary, why so sour?
Jes, loved your poem. Great prose often reads like poetry. This one does.
Seb, a great oration. Think before acting - what a novel thought!
Jake
Posted by: Jake - but not the one | June 20, 2006 at 10:08 AM
oh, and cleek, very insightful. I wonder how often we get to claim our "greats"? Like you, I don't know of any great orators or quotable writers from the places I call home.
On the other hand, I live in OKC. Can I claim Will Rogers? If so,
"But who cares about all that? Say did you know they arrested a Girl here in Hollywood the other day? She was driving down our main thoroughfare with nothing on but a heavy tan, not a stich. A Modern Lady Godiva. She dident even have the advantage of long hair. You remember the old original over in Coventry England, (by the way I played there in Vaudeville, many years ago, it tain't far from Shakespeare's old stomping ground,) well that Lady had a horse, and she had a mane longer than the horse's. But this one here the other day had traded her "Cayuse" for a Chevrolet Roadster, and her hair was short. Course this is all from heresay. I would miss it."
Jake
Posted by: Jake - but not the one | June 20, 2006 at 10:14 AM
Gary, don't complain. Over at the Atrios place the threadbot frequently goes out of control. Yesterday there were 20 open threads posted in 4 minutes. Not that I ever look at any of them.
Posted by: KCinDC | June 20, 2006 at 10:34 AM
I'll claim William Saroyan for my home, though he's a writer rather than an orator.
"The greatest happiness you can have is knowing that you do not necessarily require happiness. from My Heart's in the Highlands
Posted by: ScottM | June 20, 2006 at 12:09 PM
why not cite one of your homegrown great orators?
because there aren't any, in any of the towns i call 'home'.
Well, Sojourner Truth is from my home town, or close enough. Not that we treated her well at the time, and not that she wanted to stay, but she's got a monument now on the court house lawn. For what it's worth.
Thanks, Jes.
Posted by: Amos Newcombe | June 20, 2006 at 12:19 PM
so.. how bout that Suskind book.. ?
anyone else proud to know our President would order someone to be tortured in order to 'save face' ?
anyone else think that revelation kinda knocks the moral knees out from anyone who would complain about how wrong it was that the Iraqi insurgents tortured those two soldiers of our's ?
just asking...
Posted by: cleek | June 20, 2006 at 05:53 PM
no, cleek, it was still wrong. Torture is torture. Because our opponents do it is not justification for us to also torture, but neither is it for them.
Nor is it accurate to say that OUR actions prompted theirs. It may be accurate to say that we gave them added justifying power. If so, it was for actions already intended.
It does illustrate how little there is to choose between evils.
Jake
Posted by: Jake - but not the one | June 20, 2006 at 06:01 PM
Because our opponents do it is not justification for us to also torture, but neither is it for them.
of course - to all of your points.
my snark was tragically misphrased.
Posted by: cleek | June 20, 2006 at 06:52 PM
"It does illustrate how little there is to choose between evils."
What, my choice is bin Laden or Bush? Just shoot me.
Posted by: bob mcmanus | June 20, 2006 at 07:48 PM
Jesurgislac, is so cool.
Posted by: SomeOtherDude | June 20, 2006 at 08:30 PM
Dutch declaration of independence, 1581
Posted by: dutchmarbel | June 21, 2006 at 05:23 AM
1. "Our city is thrown open to the world"--love this line, and somehow never noticed it before.
2. I noticed the Zubaydah thing, of course.
I'm trying to be a little cautious; accounts of these things tend to differ. But it seems like he has multiple sources, at least one of them named.
What's horrible is that the Zubaydah interrogations have been the source of so many allegations and arrests. He is named as the source of information about: Jose Padilla & the "dirty bomb plot"; Benyam Mohamed, Padilla's supposed accomplice, who was sent to Morocco (where he claims they sliced his genitals with a razor) & then to CIA custody; the Yemeni prisoner who just killed himself at GTMO; and far more others than I can name.
The false positives that torture produces, when combined with our willingness to "render" people or detain them indefinitely without charge--it's not likely torture and indefinite detention based on crap evidence aren't bad on their own but when you combine them you get something truly special.
3. I don't know how much our policies contributed to those poor kids' deaths--maybe not that much. Al Qaeda is Mesopotamia, or whoever that is, tortured a lot of people. But (and I know this is beyond obvious to everyone here) it's not wrong because they're Americans, it's wrong because they're human. And we have no hope of convincing the world that it's wrong to torture American soldiers unless we take the position that it's wrong to torture anyone.
Posted by: Katherine | June 21, 2006 at 06:41 AM
ending italics. sorry.
Posted by: Katherine | June 21, 2006 at 06:42 AM
Regendering">http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2006/06/for_we_have_a_p.html">Regendering quietly in the corner...
Posted by: Jesurgislac | June 21, 2006 at 07:54 AM
...and ain't I a man?
I have born 13 children...
Bizarre.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | June 21, 2006 at 09:45 AM
Recently I was arguing the whole torture issue and was compared with hilzoy. I offered my thanks, but offered that hilzoy and I differ in so many key areas that the comparison was meaningless.
I was also compared with atrios and kos, which evoked a very different sort of response from me.
Posted by: Slartibartfast | June 21, 2006 at 09:51 AM
"And when I cried out a father's grief none but Jessica heard me"...
Posted by: Jesurgislac | June 21, 2006 at 10:35 AM