by hilzoy
New Orleans Times-Picayune, yesterday.
Michael Chertoff, yesterday afternoon: "I would be…I have not heard a report of thousands of people in the convention center who don’t have food and water."
« Oh Dear God. | Main | Rebuild »
The comments to this entry are closed.
But I need to channel my anger so I don't lose rilkefan's respect. Presuming.
Posted by: bob mcmanus | September 02, 2005 at 08:02 PM
I can't take Bush's promises of long-term aid seriously.
He promised $5 billion per year to fight AIDS in Africa. That was, what, 2 years ago? Last I heard, we hadn't kept even one year's worth of that pledge. And if you're thinking, 'Well, that's foreign aid; this time, it's America in need', his Administration still hasn't kept its post-9/11 promise to the NY police and fire departments. Nor has it fully funded NCLB.
He'll talk big for the cameras, and fail to deliver. It's his MO.
And I'm sure it's deliberate. Grover Norquist's vision is alive and well, and NOLA is the tub the government was drowned in.
Posted by: CaseyL | September 02, 2005 at 08:07 PM
Just caught David Brooks in the round table discussion on The News Hour, and he is pissed at Bush. He calls this the "anti-9/11" for the administration.
Posted by: Gromit | September 02, 2005 at 08:20 PM
Regarding the "they're looters" narrative, a stirring story on the FEMA board. Because the permalink doesn't seem to work, I've copied it onto my own blog.
Posted by: BrianM | September 02, 2005 at 08:23 PM
Anyone catch the telethon? Kanye West and Mike Myers were standing there reading copy, and Kanye West said, ON LIVE NBC TELEVISION, "George Bush doesn't care about black people." They cut off of him so fast I heard the electrons snap like a whip. I wish I had Tivoed it.
Posted by: Phil | September 02, 2005 at 09:16 PM
Phil -- yes, I saw that. And yes, they did cut away to someone else who asked earnestly for help, and they did it with breathtaking speed.
They have now gotten National Guard troops, food, and water to the convention center, but have not yet managed a single bus to take people away.
Posted by: hilzoy | September 02, 2005 at 09:26 PM
He promised $5 billion per year to fight AIDS in Africa.
And very little of the $18 billion for Iraqi reconstruction has been spent either.
And then there is the monies pledged for tsunami relief.
Money promised and never delivered is not just an American phenomena, sadly.
Posted by: 2shoes | September 02, 2005 at 09:33 PM
FYI,
Chertoff means devil in Russian.
Posted by: Randy Paul | September 02, 2005 at 09:51 PM
Just caught David Brooks in the round table discussion on The News Hour, and he is pissed at Bush
Other than the true believers, who isn't? This crap is ridiculous. My grandfather could do a better job as leader during this disaster and he passed away a decade or so ago. Dig him out of his grave, prop him up in a chair, stick a sign in his hand that says "private donations to support the victims of hurricane Katrina are welcome", and damn, you've got a more effective response than Bush has provided.
Worst president ever. Sorry but seeing my countrymen dying for no reason pisses me the hell off.
I mean really...who here, other than the true believers, is not pissed at Bush?
Posted by: felixrayman | September 02, 2005 at 10:53 PM
Yes, people are furious at Bush now (hell, even Tony Blankley wasn't willing to go along with the "people who chose to stay" talking point this morning), but my bet is that within a week he's going to have a popularity bump out of this. I hope I'm wrong, but that's what I expect.
I remember 9/11 and the couple of days after, and I remember how Bush appeared (or didn't appear) then (This Modern World has a reminder). But within a week I had liberal friends telling me what a great guy Bush was, and he'd been transformed into the hero of 9/11.
The PR machine is just kicking in, and the press will gradually get back to its usual obsequiousness. We'll see soon enough whether I'm right.
With that, I'd better go make another donation.
Posted by: KCinDC | September 02, 2005 at 11:35 PM
Say what you will about Bush's initial reaction to September 11--it did not cause or contribute to any deaths.
I don't think it's just Bush, though. I feel like something bigger has gone wrong with our government and our country, and this administration is a symptom of it as well as a cause.
Posted by: Katherine | September 02, 2005 at 11:52 PM
The husband of a friend of mine is a career FEMA manager. I don't know his exact job title but he is based in Wasington DC, has travelled the world to direct relief efforts, and the organization of relief is his life's work.
He nearly quit last year because of job stress and frustration. Ever since Bush got into office in 2000, according to this man, FEMA has been run more as a cult than a professional organization. People are promoted or hired based on loyalty to Bush and passed over, avoided, or encouraged to leave if known to be Democrats. FEMA's last two heads have been unqualified political appointments but the rot goes deeper than that: unqualified political appointments have been made throughout the organization. Andrea's husband has been talking about this for years.
The same sort of thing has been going on in the EPA, the National Park Service, and the Forest Service. It's parallel to the decision to send a bunch of Heritage Foundation adolescents to tell the Iraqis how to rebuild and, of course, reminescent of the botching of nearly every aspect of the war itself. It's Bush's management style; reward loyalty and punish expertise.
Posted by: lily | September 02, 2005 at 11:57 PM
TAXES = THEFT
I hear that from a lot of right-wing Christians. I mean, they mean "THEFT" on par with murder and not regonizing the Sabbath.
When bad things happen, the righteous will prevail and the wicked will be punished.
Posted by: NeoDude | September 03, 2005 at 12:03 AM
The Senate Republicans want to pass another tax cut for rich people. BullMoose has a good essay about the current stae of Republicanism in the US. The only solution is for people to just stop voting Republican for awhile, until the party gets the nuts and wackos out of the leadership.
Posted by: lily | September 03, 2005 at 12:15 AM
KCinDC:
For the first time since godknowswhen, I'd be surprised if Bush can rise out of this so easily. Psychologically speaking, 9/11 really did come out of the blue. While there was arguably criminal mismanagement in Bush's neglect of antiterrorism prior to the event, it wasn't something that was publicly known, and in the shock of the moment there wasn't much interest in investigating it until much later. By that time Bush's people had established a narrative. Additionally, the country had not yet been so harshly polarised by the subsequent four years of Bush's divide-and-rule governing style, so people were prepared to cut him some slack.
This is very different. The disaster has happened slowly, and people have expected him from the start to step up to the plate. It has been obvious from the beginning what the government should have been doing, and that it hasn't been doing it. So unlike 9/11, the narrative has already been established. This time, the deaths are clearly being seen as Bush's responsibility, at least in part. And scarred by the experience of the last four years, the public is far, far less willing to be trustful of him than they were four years ago.
And to give him about the only credit I am prepared to in his entire term in office to date, after the first few days his response to 9/11 did hit most of the right rhetorical notes, I thought (for about 3 weeks, until it started degenerating into crusades and axis-of-evil stuff). This time, by contrast, he seems to be phoning it in; barely even trying.
There seems to be a kind of horrific symmetry about this; for the second time, W is confronted with a catastrophe eight months into his term. The first time, innocent of how divisive he would turn out to be, people were able to support him. I'd be astonished if that were the case now. He'd actually have to really do his job rather than just try to look funky while pretending to; on the available evidence, this is beyond him.
Posted by: Andrew | September 03, 2005 at 12:32 AM
Andrew, you make some good points, and I really hope you're right. But we both know that there's a large segment of the population whose perceptions of Bush are very different from yours and mine. I can only guess what things are like on their planet. Bush may be able to manage enough hugs and emotional speeches in the next few days to turn things around.
Posted by: KCinDC | September 03, 2005 at 01:00 AM
I got a dose of one person's thinking on "their Planet" this morning at work. I was talking to my secretary about how the Bush adminitration has destroyed FEMA and I made the statement that Bush was directly responisble for the screwed up relief services because of the the politicizing of FEMA, when my "pro-life" co-worker entered the room. She immediately started in about how the people who chose to stay in the city were to blame for their own situation. Of course this is the woman who is always telling us about how she prays to God for His intercepions in her life. For example, she asked God to arrange a dental appointment for her son. She was trying to get the appointment in order to screw up a vacation her ex-husband had planned for their son. Asked her once why she thought God micromanged her life when He didn't rescue six million Jews. She said that God helps her because she is a Christian.
Posted by: lily | September 03, 2005 at 01:24 AM
I would like to see a discussion on how various governments would have handled a catastrophe like New Orleans.
I would like to offer three examples:
1) New Orleans, Louisiana
2) Antwerp, Belgium
3) Dhaka, Bangladesh
I anticipate that the New Orleans response would occupy a space between Antwerp and Dhaka that would be uncomfotably close to Dhaka for many people's taste. I do believe that the distance between the proper response of a first world nation and that demonstrated by The Good Old USA to date is very uncomfortable to this commenter.
Posted by: etc. | September 03, 2005 at 01:29 AM
Crooks and Liars has the Kanye West video. You can see his heart breaking onstage.
Posted by: Gromit | September 03, 2005 at 01:35 AM
Well I don't think anyone blamed the Bengladeshi people for not getting out of town. The Texas Republican Party platform called for the dismantling of FEMA. It has become one of the sort of underground goals of the Republican party to destroy institutions for the commnon good mostly through underfunding but also by staffing those institutions with people who don't support the institution's mission. Putting Anne Gorsuch incharge of the EPA, for example. Or Gail Norton in charge of the Dept. of the Interior. This is Bush's mess because he put people in charge of FEMA who were not qualified and who did not even believe in the importance of FEMA. His appointment decisions were intended to undercut the agency and they did.
Posted by: lily | September 03, 2005 at 01:47 AM
bob, silence conveys assent. More silence:
Posted by: rilkefan | September 03, 2005 at 01:51 AM
"bob, silence conveys assent. More silence"
rilkefan, it has been a long day
you really helped;thank you
Posted by: bob mcmanus | September 03, 2005 at 02:25 AM
I don't know why anybody hasn't posted the obvious,if the Democrats had been in office the storm never would have happened! The NY Times had some good pieces yesterday,yes I gritted my teeth and forced myself to read it.There is plenty of blame to go around,the Army Corps of Engineers which oversees the leeves,state and local gov't,and even FEMA from whose bureaucratic fingers the rays of the sun did once issue forth,before savage budget cuts caused by republicans who like to see people suffer. Gotta keep playing the children's game. This is a failure of government at all levels,all parties and higher taxes would have been spent on whatever pressure groups screamed the loudest. This was one of the things pointed out in the Times articles,who lobbied for more disaster spending and what kind of clout did they have? This is government in action four years after 9/11,this is what you pay for and it doesn't matter at what level or what the funding is. Have your fun with Bush but if you think a man who did focus groups on where to take himself and his rotund wife on vacation would have done better then let me sell you some confederate war bonds. I've seen that there is anarchy and even rape in N.O.,speaking of Clinton anybody know his whereabouts? Off to the playground of the rich for the weekend. There are tax cuts to be discussed and cocktails to be consumed.
Posted by: johnt | September 03, 2005 at 08:14 AM
Here is some rank inside-the-beltway Plame-related political infighting speculation, for those who need comic relief. As I said, how could freshman Rep Senator Vitter give the administration an 'F'. I had a theory, another one involves WH infighting and 2008 and not caring or even engineering Bush's collapse. Vitter may have chosen the winning side.
Where is Dick
Red State, I am sure on orders from above, is starting to make the LA Gov and NO Mayor the bad guys here. Here are a couple notes from Josh Marshall countering that:
"An article in the Post suggests the US military was ready to begin emergency food drops into New Orleans much earlier in the week. But they were waiting on a request from FEMA.
Lousiana Gov. Blanco accepted an offer of state National Guard troops from New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson on Sunday, just before the storm hit. But the paperwork from Washington, allowing the troops to deploy, didn't come until Thursday."
Marshall
Posted by: bob mcmanus | September 03, 2005 at 10:01 AM
BrianM, thanks for that link. Stirring stories indeed.
Posted by: tonydismukes | September 03, 2005 at 12:03 PM
I don't think it's just Bush, though. I feel like something bigger has gone wrong with our government and our country, and this administration is a symptom of it as well as a cause.
There's never been a time when greed and fear haven't played a large role in public life.
But.
For the last five years we have been encouraged to elevate our darker impulses (greed, intolerance, fear) and to expect that behavior from those leading us. Crises that might have been used to draw us together and draw out our nobler impulses (shared sacrifice, tolerance, hope) have instead been used to divide us as a means of consolidating power and wealth. It's disturbing that we fall for it so readily.
Posted by: notyou | September 03, 2005 at 12:55 PM
Red State, I am sure on orders from above,
Heh. Pretty ironic how you say that and right after post something from a blog called Talking Points...
Posted by: Stan LS | September 03, 2005 at 12:56 PM
Hi Stan!
Boy, I don't approve of the tone of this link at all.
Driftglass
But I kinda liked this:
"And while there is a special place reserved in Hell for drunken idiots who plow their Caddy’s through crowds of innocent people, giggling as they die, and then stagger out of the car swearing it wasn’t their fault, there is a special, deeper, hotter place reserved for those that tossed the drunken, giggling idiot the keys to the car in the first place and said, “Go ahead. You drive.”"
Posted by: bob mcmanus | September 03, 2005 at 01:35 PM
Bob McManus, holy crap! You guys will really start slashing veins when a republican wins in 2008.
Posted by: Stan LS | September 03, 2005 at 02:52 PM
Pretty ironic how you say that and right after post something from a blog called Talking Points...
Are the points valid or not? Why are you ignoring them?
Posted by: 2shoes | September 03, 2005 at 03:11 PM
You guys will really start slashing veins when a republican wins in 2008.
What makes you think we aren't slashing our wrists right now?
Posted by: liberal japonicus | September 03, 2005 at 06:22 PM
Heh. Pretty ironic how you say that and right after post something from a blog called Talking Points...
Even more ironic when you realize the origin of the name...
Posted by: Anarch | September 03, 2005 at 10:49 PM
And they said that "irony was dead."
Posted by: ral | September 03, 2005 at 11:31 PM
This is me really kind of speechless...
Posted by: Jesurgislac | September 04, 2005 at 02:15 AM
Apparently, it wasn't just ZDF and it wasn't just in New Orleans. Tagesschau had a report as well if you want to work on German.
(via the comments of this Armando post at DKos)
Posted by: liberal japonicus | September 04, 2005 at 04:02 AM
The more I read about the aftermath of Katrina, the more shocked and stunned I am. One of the Dutch blogs I read likes 'visual comments' and photoshopped this. But that seems to be one of the lesser evils now.
Posted by: dutchmarbel | September 04, 2005 at 06:05 PM