by hilzoy
I think we are in need of an open thread. As I have nothing particularly interesting to say myself, I'll just cite some quotes that I love.
"Are we all living like this? Two lives, the ideal outer life and the inner imaginative life where we keep our secrets? ...The Buddhists say there are 149 ways to God. I'm not looking for God, only for myself, and that is far more complicated. God has had a great deal written about Him; nothing has been written about me. God is bigger, like my mother, and easier to find, even in the dark. I could be anywhere, and since I can't describe myself I can't ask for help. ...
I have met a great many pilgrims on their way towards God and I wonder why they have chosen to look for him rather than themselves. Perhaps I'm missing the point -- perhaps while looking for someone else you might come across yourself unexpectedly, in a garden somewhere or on a mountain watching the rain. But they don't seem to care about who they are. Some of them have told me that the very point of searching for God is to forget about oneself, to lose oneself for ever. But it is not difficult to lose oneself, or is it the ego they are talking about, the hollow screaming cadaver that has no spirit within it?
I think that cadaver is only the ideal self run mad, and if the other life, the secret life, could be found and brought home, then a person might live in peace and have no need of God. After all, He has no need for us, being complete."
Jeanette Winterson, Sexing the Cherry
"Will not a tiny speck very close to our vision blot out the glory of the world, and leave only a margin by which we see the blot? I know no speck so troublesome as self."George Eliot, Middlemarch
"Our lifetimes have seen the opening of abysses before which the mind quails. But it seems to me there are a few things everyone can humbly try to hold onto: love and mercy (and humor) in day-to-day living; the quest for exact truth in language and affairs of the intellect; self-recollection or prayer; and the peace, the composed energy, of art."Robert Fitzgerald"
"I am tired of innocence and its uselessness."Adrienne Rich
And, lest this all get too lofty, one more:
Robert Conquest: When his history of Stalin's purges, The Great Terror, was republished after the fall of communism, his American publisher asked him to suggest a new title. He came up with "I told you so, you f*cking fools".
Paging Charles Bird; Charles Bird to the white courtesy blog.
More oxymoronic intelligent design stuff.
Senator Warner is calling Rumsfeld in for hearings on Iraq. Next week.
Man caught via cameraphone he stole after he uploads pictures he took to the stored website.
A certain effing town in Austria. (Bad Word Used repeatedly.)
More journalists killed in Iraq than during 20 years of Vietnam War.
Fantastic quotes on what the future of radio/movies/tv will bring, said when they were new.
2004 Election Cartograms.
British judges out of Wodehouse.
Space elevator news.
Army contractor inspector who is chief critic of Halliburton is demoted.
Saudi Arabia finds Israeli paper cups, freaks out.
This picture is for you, Slarti.
Complain to tv stations to let them air the Darfur commercial critical of the networks.
Other stuff.
Well, you said "open." :-)
Posted by: Gary Farber, | August 29, 2005 at 07:25 PM
British judges 'out of Wodehouse?' Take it from an ex-court reporter, they're not that funny. 'I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.' No judge ever came out with one like that in a summing up.
Posted by: Peter McGrath | August 29, 2005 at 07:47 PM
If Fox had reported Katrina like Iraq.
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 29, 2005 at 07:50 PM
"Take it from an ex-court reporter, they're not that funny."
Well, did you read the story, or were you exercising your precognitive talent?
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 29, 2005 at 07:51 PM
1. Everything you knew about lemmings is a lie:
Posted by: Katherine | August 29, 2005 at 08:09 PM
Heh, Gary, I emailed that WashPost story by Sally Jenkins to PZ Myers at Pharyngula this morning as soon as I read it in the dead-tree edition at work. The poor man is probably only two or three more articles like that away from a stroke.
Posted by: Phil | August 29, 2005 at 08:17 PM
Katherine: thanks -- I love it when some tiny piece of my mental world becomes more accurate. (Not in the least sarcastic.) Now I wonder: what on earth were the Disney people thinking? Why that bizarre myth? Hmm.
Posted by: hilzoy | August 29, 2005 at 08:19 PM
Sheep, however... (See bottom paragraph).
Posted by: rilkefan | August 29, 2005 at 08:22 PM
Change of subject: Wes Clark is on TMP Cafe, Table for One. As a Clark obsessive, I have been looking forward to his visit for weeks!
Posted by: lily | August 29, 2005 at 08:24 PM
re: British judges being a bit behind the times.
This story is about a British don, rather than a judge, but still a propos, I hope.
De Montfort University is a perfectly respectable provincial British University around Leicester. It used to be called Leicester Polytechnic; then in '92 it got its new name, to honor Simon De Montfort, Earl of Leicester back in the 1200's.
Reflecting the population of the neighboring cities from which it draws its students, it has (or at least had back in the early '90s) a large percentage of students from South Asia and the Middle East. When the new name was being debated, some of them felt that it was absurd to name it after another Dead White Male, and wanted something more up to date (Mandela U? Gandhi Poly? I don't remember the competition).
I was having breakfast at a college in Oxford back in '93 when several people at the end of the table took up the topic--"De Montfort", "controversy", and "racialism" drifted down the table.
Across from me, a very old boy whom I knew to have been a first-rate scholar from the '40s right through the '90s was hearing the same scraps of conversation that I was, and mumbling to himself trying to put them together:
"De Montfort...? Racialism...?"
He frowned in great puzzlement, bushy white eyebrows joining in the middle.
"De Montfort...?" Again, puzzlement mixed with incomprehension.
"Ah! Yes!" he said, to no one in particular, now satisfied that he had it sorted out, "Yes, well the *name* is French of course, but I don't see the problem--the *family* has been here for *generations!".
That's right--he thought the concerns about "racialism" had to do with giving an English university a French name.
Another Wodehouse moment.
Posted by: Tad Brennan | August 29, 2005 at 08:32 PM
Clark is blogging (well, we'll see) here.
Posted by: rilkefan | August 29, 2005 at 08:37 PM
2. The two Canadians tortured in Syria before Maher Arar, Ahmad el-Maati and Abdullah Almalki, have given extensive interviews to the press for the first time.
El-Maati was arrested in Syria in November 2001:
El-Maati was transferred from Syria to Egypt in 2002; in this article he made allegations of torture in Egypt which were new to me:
Almalki was apparently a suspect even before September 11 (the details are in the article), and Arar apparently first came to the attention of Canadian intelligence because he had lunch with Almalki.
El-Maati
These two cases are not in themselves renditions--though it's possible that the U.S. took part in sending El-Maati to Egypt; I just don't know. Almalki and El-Maati traveled to Syria on their own. But:
1) it looks overhelmingly likely that they were arrested at the request of Western intelligence--and I doubt that Canadian intelligence has a relationship with Syria and Egypt that's completely indpendent of the U.S. intelligence relationship.
2) there's probably a comparable level of ongoing collaboration with these countries' intelligence services after a rendition.
3) Arar seems to have been deported mainly on the strength of his acquaintance with Almalki and El-Maati and their confessions under torture in Syria.
4) El-Maati had alleged torture in Syria to Canadian officials at least two months before Arar was sent to Syria.
Posted by: Katherine | August 29, 2005 at 08:38 PM
"Now I wonder: what on earth were the Disney people thinking? Why that bizarre myth? Hmm."
That was explained in the story, towards the bottom. It's based on fact, their pattern of dispersal when their population pops up, and this can result:
So it's not as if the Disney people made it up out of whole cloth; they just rather misinterpreted and mislabeled and misdescribed actual behavior.Admittedly, that's a lot of "mis-es."
Besides, did you notice the bit where it mentioned that lemmings can be cannibalistic?
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 29, 2005 at 08:59 PM
I don't even want to think about cannibal sheep.
Posted by: rilkefan | August 29, 2005 at 09:04 PM
And don't let Slart get started about "canniballistic" vs "cannonballistic".
Posted by: rilkefan | August 29, 2005 at 09:06 PM
Lili, I'd wanted to ask you earlier whereabouts in the Yukon you'd been travelling. And how did you find Whitehorse? (I've family up there.)
Posted by: Jackmormon | August 29, 2005 at 09:14 PM
And how did you find Whitehorse?
Turn right at Juneau.
(Apologies to John Lennon. Or to Alan Owun, in any case.)
Posted by: Phil | August 29, 2005 at 09:26 PM
I was going to say, Follow the white hoofprints, but thought better of it.
Posted by: rilkefan | August 29, 2005 at 09:29 PM
Turn right at Juneau.
More like turn right at Skagway, where there's a highway! I've taken a "direct" flight from Juneau to Whitehorse: at the time the best option was a six-person bi-plane, cutting across glacial fjords.
"Follow the white hoofprints" makes some sense given that the river there made the city possible and that until the dams went up in the early 20th, the Yukon River was pretty heavy there.
But as I've been making fun of my Yukon relatives forever, I won't deprive you all of the opportunity. Hell, I might even write up more of my ornery old Grandad's stories.
Posted by: Jackmormon | August 29, 2005 at 09:50 PM
"Apologies to John Lennon"
Also: "Women should be obscene and not heard."
This I disagree with. It's fine with me if women are obscene and loudly opiniated about it.
P.S. Beatle irony just to see what happens.
"Are we living like this? Two lives, the outer ideal life and the inner imaginative life where we keep our secrets? ..
Yes, we are. So, apropos of nothing, I've been thinking about the perennial subject of pop/rock music (cause I work with with people who write the stuff and have some ideas myself) and how the great pop/rock songs are about unrequieted love, not about the requieted love we've got right in front of us. ( for that, tune into country-western) You know, how come you can't have that over there, and why is that so fascinating when fascination is right in front of you .. and why doesn't that little quandary go away, you idiot?
This is all smaller-scale metaphysical and outrageously imaginary, of course.
By the way, this is the best post leading into an open thread -- ever. Thank you.
Posted by: John Thullen | August 29, 2005 at 10:00 PM
http://tacitus.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2005/8/26/85234/9275>Character href> attack on Clark if you want forewarning. Probably worthwhile, it did/will have some traction. Separately, sparticus' quote list is a nice reminder.
Posted by: CMatt | August 29, 2005 at 10:21 PM
As far as random highfalutin quotations, here are two from Polish poets who wouldn't cooperate with the Communist Regime:
1. From Another Beauty, by Adam Zagajewski
We find comfort only in
another beauty, in others'
music, in the poetry of others.
Salvation lies with others,
though solitude may taste like
opium. Other people aren't hell
if you glimpse them at dawn, when
their brows are clean, rinsed by dreams.
2. A Matter of Taste, Zbigniew Herbert
It didn't require great character at all
our refusal disagreement and resistance
we had a shred of necessary courage
but fundamentally it was a matter of taste
Yes taste
in which there are fibers of soul
the cartilage of conscience
Who knows if we had been better and more
attractively tempted
sent rose-skinned women thin as a wafer
or fantastic creatures from the paintings of
Hieronymus Bosch
but what kind of hell was there at this time
a wet pit the murderers' alley the barrack
called a palace of justice
a home-brewed Mephisto in a Lenin jacket
sent Aurora's grandchildren on into the field
boys with potato faces
very ugly girls with red hands
..............
So aesthetics can be helpful in life
one should not neglect the study of beauty
Before we declare our consent
we must carefully examine
the shape of the architecture
the rhythm of the drums
official colors
the despicable ritual of funerals
Our eyes refused obedience
the princes of our senses proudly chose exile
Posted by: Katherine | August 29, 2005 at 10:28 PM
Oops; the second one is actually called "The Power of Taste".
Posted by: Katherine | August 29, 2005 at 10:28 PM
Lily (sorry for earlier typo),
I'd love to hear about your travels via email mine blog or wherever. For now, to bed.
Posted by: Jackmormon | August 29, 2005 at 10:43 PM
I am so disappointed about the lemmings I can not bring myself to comment snarkily about the Kentucky pardons. Just devastated. We need...I was going to say Elliott Smith or Cobain but that would be in bad taste...we need a saintly depressive to preach suicide to the lemmings so my world is right-sideup again.
Posted by: bob mcmanus | August 29, 2005 at 10:57 PM
I don't even want to think about cannibal sheep.
Is it time to start resurrecting the Geoffrey Howe jokes?
Posted by: Anarch | August 29, 2005 at 10:59 PM
Via Gary's blog-whoring linkfest comment, the last sentence of the Warner-Rumsfeld NYT article:
Mr. Warner has also said he will schedule a hearing in the next several weeks on whether the Pentagon has failed to hold senior officials and military officers responsible for the prisoner abuses that took place at the Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad, and at other detention centers in Iraq, Cuba and Afghanistan.
Whether???
Is that really the right question? Is the oh-so-obvious answer not official until the Senate Armed Forces Committee issues it? I'm so tired of being glad for the merest, wispy scraps of accountability.
Posted by: Nell | August 29, 2005 at 11:24 PM
And Katherine, thank you so much for the links to the further torture / rendition stories.
Posted by: Nell | August 29, 2005 at 11:27 PM
to katherine. nightmare-free sleep is highly overrated; thanks for the post.
since this is an open thread, and since tomorrow, tuesday, is my 40-something birthday, my birthday request is that Jes and Gary try to work stuff out.
jes: you are a powerful, passionate poster. i love reading what you write. but you do, sometimes, overreach, and when called on it tend to dig in your heels. i know that Gary can be incredibly aggravating, but please understand that he frequently is making legitimate points.
gary: as a fine old lawyer once told me, you have a great instinct for the capillaries. while i appreciate your sense that you're the one who's been wronged, please try to understand that in this debating society, sometimes passion exceeds precision. even you are sometimes guilty of that flaw. you too are an interesting poster but this spat with jes is distracting and detracting from your other work.
anyway, that's my birthday request.
cheers
Posted by: Francis / BRGORD | August 30, 2005 at 01:18 AM
Francis wishes for world peace, or practically. Happy b-day despite your annoying utopianism.
If wishes were ponies, then bloggers would ride...
Posted by: rilkefan | August 30, 2005 at 01:47 AM
Yeesh, that's not in google. What's wrong with you people?
Posted by: rilkefan | August 30, 2005 at 01:55 AM
Need a break from serious political debate? Have a go at my first-ever caption contest.
Posted by: GaijinBiker | August 30, 2005 at 04:02 AM
Here I was, at 4 am, thinking this thread would be a useful diversion to a dreary night. So I thought I'd go to Chekhov and find something, since I like Chekhov so damned much. You know, I can't think of anything in Chekhov's stories that sounds good outside of its context. But it all sounds so trite when you aphorize it. Maybe that could be a contest: try to make Chekhov sound good minus the context.
Posted by: Piscator | August 30, 2005 at 07:11 AM
That's the beauty of Chekhov -- you need to read the whole thing.
A very different writer -- Cormac McCarthy (sp?) -- is the same. Take a single sentence from "Blood Meridian" and you have absolute senseless bombast. But in context and in the aggregate that book is biblical (isolate a sentence or two from that tome just for laughs) in its cadence and impact.
Or maybe I just like bombast IN context.
Posted by: John Thullen | August 30, 2005 at 10:01 AM
Yeah, I know what you mean about Cormac McCarthy. That's just the trait of his that that BF Meyer fellow was able to fixate on and ridicule. Makes you kind of think that you have to suspend disbelief as much with style as with plotting.
Posted by: Piscator | August 30, 2005 at 12:15 PM
jackmormon, How lucky you are to have relatives in Whitehorse! Do you ever go up to visit? I tried to email you at your website but I couln't get registered. The site kept rejecting my user name. In any case, you can email me if you like. I have been to the Yukon five or six times, the Arctic Cirle twice, Alska more frequently, but always in the summer which means I'm still a cheekako. I'm trying to talk my boyfriend into moving up there after we no longer have elderly folks to care for.
Posted by: lily | August 30, 2005 at 12:16 PM
I used to visit every other summer but haven't been for a little while. I've never been in the winter and I've never been further north than Dawson, so you're more hardcore already than I am. Are you thinking of moving to Alaska or to the Yukon?
Posted by: Jackmormon | August 30, 2005 at 12:50 PM
Charles Bird to the white courtesy blog.
And what do I do when I get there? Is there something wish you to discuss?
Posted by: Charles Bird | August 30, 2005 at 12:59 PM
Well, I was trying to offer you some support for one of your pet causes, but, hey, if that's your way of saying "thanks, interesting," I'll keep that in mind.
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 30, 2005 at 01:13 PM
"And what do I do
when I get there?"
You ask for a pony
to ride mon frere.
How do I ride
the white horse?
Wear your boots
or blog in morse.
What if that horse
has two headaches?
Ride or swim
till your heart breaks.
Posted by: rilkefan | August 30, 2005 at 01:17 PM
okay, this is really rilkefan's bailiwick; I'm a basically prosaic person. TAD
Posted by: My soul is a spiteful spider poised | August 30, 2005 at 01:18 PM
Evening all, just gotten back from the US (apologies to Anarch, we never got over to Wisconsin, the folks in Minnesota said something about visas...) and am now trying to explain to our six year old why the fact that she is wide awake does not mean that she doesn't need to go to bed. (We've given up on trying to get the 1 yr old asleep) Any hints for explaining jet lag to this demographic would be greatly appreciated.
My folks are in Carriere, Mississippi (60 miles inland from Biloxi), so I'm waiting to make sure they are ok, so I'm staying up, unfortunately.
Beyond the usual striking things that I see when I go to the states (immense portions! tipping! driving on the wrong side of the road!) I was amazed by the almost complete absence of anything about Iraq. Obviously, I'm not going to go up to people on the streets and ask, but if it weren't for the magnetic yellow ribbons on the back of people's cars, I would have no idea.
Since this is an open thread, Piscator, if you are dipping into Chekhov, you should take in some Turgenev.
Posted by: liberal japonicus | August 30, 2005 at 01:44 PM
lj, I thought The Hunter's Notebook (approximate title, books terminally out of order) was pretty good, what would be next?
Tad, "poised" is a little hard to rhyme. Once is happenstance...
Posted by: rilkefan | August 30, 2005 at 01:55 PM
" Maybe that could be a contest: try to make Chekhov sound good minus the context."
It's certainly not entirely context-free, but in Neil Simon's _The_Good_Doctor_, adapted from Chekhov short stories (?), there's a wonderful audition scene where the director asks the would-be actress "How old are you?" and she immediately responds "How old would you like me to be?"
(Quoted from memory ...)
Posted by: dr ngo | August 30, 2005 at 01:55 PM
Tad, very clever. I only wish I had had the chance to see it in the sidebar. As it was, it took me a minute to figure out what on earth you meant.
Posted by: kenB | August 30, 2005 at 01:59 PM
kenB--
Thanks. I think the fact that it was over before anyone could see it means that it was performance art.
"it took me a minute to figure out what on earth you mean"
I only wish I had as good an excuse all the other times....
Posted by: Tad Brennan | August 30, 2005 at 02:04 PM
Anyone like the First Amendment? Good. Here is a cause and project I've been meaning to tout for weeks; pass on the information, please.
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 30, 2005 at 02:07 PM
rilkefan
Fathers and Sons and Rudin are the other two that I have read. I especially liked the former.
Posted by: liberal japonicus | August 30, 2005 at 02:24 PM
If anyone wants to discuss a country where proven confiscations have taken place, for a new move to take away property rights, see here.
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 30, 2005 at 04:12 PM
Back on Katrina, it's turning out that the death and destruction is far worse than thought earlier today. The camera crews have only just been getting through to the more extreme places. I'm watching NBC now doing long helicopter tracking shots, over Biloxi and elsewhere; words kept being repeated "hard to imagine it could be worse than this," "catastrophic," "devastation," and so on. And New Orleans is 80% under water, and the water is still rising, the levee having broken. Plus looters. National guard in amphibious troop carriers have gone in.
This is just awful.Posted by: Gary Farber | August 30, 2005 at 07:40 PM
Along with the looting, the flooding, the trapped people, the people being evacuated, the dead body in the street, and everything else, NBC just showed, good lord, a horde of people on a toweringly high elevated highway, seeking safe high ground.
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 30, 2005 at 07:51 PM
Paging Rilkefan.
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 30, 2005 at 09:58 PM
"She served as a judge for the 2004-2005 National Book Awards."
Gary, my book of poems will not get published by someone who would write that poem, or someone who would appoint such a person as a judge, or ...
Posted by: rilkefan | August 30, 2005 at 10:16 PM
Oh lord, it looks really bad in New Orleans. Just this morning, I was saying to myself well, now I really must plan that long-delayed trip to New Orleans!. I was even feeling self-righteous, thinking that my tourist-dollars would help with relief. Now it all looks very different, and I feel like an ass.
The good Nielsen-Haydens have been link-farming on this disaster like crazy.
Posted by: Jackmormon | August 30, 2005 at 10:18 PM
"Nielsen-Haydens"
There's no hyphen in their name.
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 30, 2005 at 10:41 PM
Correction acknowledged.
Posted by: Jackmormon | August 30, 2005 at 10:55 PM