by Charles
Concerning the murders of the Armanious family, I wrote a post here, titled Sharia Vigilantism in New Jersey? which raised the question as to whether this was a Muslim-on-Christian hate crime. I wrote this: "He paid for those beliefs in full, not only with his life but his family's", and then linked to a post by Robert Spencer which jumped to a premature conclusion. I also made reference to their fate in a post here on Wahhabi evangelism in America, to wit: "Jersey City is where the slaughtered Armanious family lived. Coincidence? Possibly, but we don't know yet."
I was mistaken for doing so. Associated Press reported the arrest of two murder suspects, Edward McDonald and Hamilton Sanchez:
But Hudson County Prosecutor Edward DeFazio said the killings took place during a robbery by the two men, who owed someone a large sum of money.
"I'd like to make one thing perfectly clear: The motive for these murders was robbery. This was a crime based on greed, the desperate need of money," DeFazio said.
I apologize to the OW readership, and I retract any reference made which suggested or hinted, directly or indirectly, implicitly or explicitly, that the murderers were Muslims, and for any words which could be interpreted in that fashion.
Thank you for your reply, I appreciate it. I was pretty surprised as well. I understand the copyright issues and appreciate the fact that you do mark elisions. Consider my apology to WND cancelled ;^)
Posted by: liberal japonicus | March 08, 2005 at 06:13 PM
I appreciate your response, Robert. I took your meaning differently in your post in question. The threads of your interviewees opinions and your thoughts were fairly well interweaved.
Posted by: Charles Bird | March 09, 2005 at 10:39 AM