It's grey and cold here in Baltimore, with tiny bits of snow falling now and again, so I wondered: what could I post that might liven things up a bit? And for some reason my thoughts turned to peculiar saints. In the same way that some people (myself included) love reading atlases, I love reading biographies of saints, especially the odder ones. So, for your enjoyment and edification, I present St. Joseph of Cupertino, "The Flying Friar":
"On October 4, 1630, the town of Cupertino held a procession on the feast day of St. Francis. Joseph was assisting in the procession when he suddenly soared into the sky and remained there hovering over the crowd of people looking on at this spectacular sight. When he came down and realized what had happened, Joseph became so embarrassed that he fled to his mother's house to hide from the crowds. This was the first of his many flights, which earned him the name, "The Flying Saint". Needless to say, his life changed dramatically after this incident. They also continued and seemed to become more frequent. In fact, his 'flights' were so frequent that his superiors would not permit him to take part in community exercises for years on the belief that it would cause too great a distraction for the members of the friary. But Joseph could not contain himself. On hearing the names of Jesus and Mary, he would simply go into ecstasy and would remain there until a superior commanded him under obedience to come to his senses. Incidents of his flights also took place when he would hear the sweet singing of hymns, when he celebrated the feast day of St. Francis or during a Holy Thursday Mass when he was praying before the Blessed Sacrament. His most famous occasion occurred during a papal audience before Pope Urban VIII. When he bent down to kiss the Pope's feet, he was suddenly filled with reverence for Christ's Vicar on earth, and was lifted up into the air. Only when the Minister General of the Order, who was part of the audience, ordered him down was Joseph able to return to the floor."
From another biography:
"It would come suddenly upon him anywhere; as it were from out of space the eyes of God would look at him, or on the face of nature the hand of God would be seen at work, disposing all things. Joseph would stand still, exactly as the vision caught him, fixed as a statue, insensible as a stone, and nothing could move him. The brethren would use pins and burning embers to recall him to his senses, but nothing could he feel. When he did revive and saw what had happened, he would call these visitations fits of giddiness, and ask them not to burn him again. (...)In the midst of these ecstasies Joseph would rise from the ground, and move about in the air. In the church especially this would come upon him; he would fly towards the altar or over it, or to a shrine on a special festival. In the refectory, during a meal, he would suddenly rise from the ground with a dish of food in his hands, much to the alarm of the brethren at table. When he was out in the country begging, suddenly he would fly into a tree. Once when some workmen were laboring to plant a huge stone cross in its socket, Joseph rose above them, took up the cross and placed it in the socket for them."
Just knowing the story of Saint Joseph of Cupertino puts both Silicon Valley and petit mal epilepsy in a whole new light. Enjoy.
Darn, screwed up the layout. Also, I forgot to mention: St. Joseph is the patron saint of aviators.
Posted by: hilzoy | February 12, 2005 at 12:47 PM
Seizure-of-some-sort inducing.
Posted by: rilkefan | February 12, 2005 at 01:00 PM
rilkefan: I'm working on that one, actually...
Posted by: hilzoy | February 12, 2005 at 01:02 PM
Gee, just as I was smiling over hilzoy's piece on St. Joseph of Cupertino (I didn't know California had produced any saints ;) ), rilkefan comes along with that marvelous link to the latest leftists-hate-America rant (seconded by Instapundit, so it MUST be real!) - Ahh, nice to know that vile political invective is still alive and well in the blogosphere.
Maybe this should become the subject of a post from one of the (eloquent and articulate) ObWi regulars: for me, the recent (or IIJM?) escalation in hate-rhetoric from the right (spurred, inanely, by the obscure Ward Churchill's idiotic blather, and its equally unimportant aftermath) is more than just mildly disturbing. Or IS it just me?
Posted by: Jay C. | February 12, 2005 at 01:21 PM
And for comparison there is St. Christina the Astonishing, admirably written about here: http://www.cynthialarge.com/christina/christinapage2.html
I can also recommend the marvelous French writer Blaise Cendrars memoir, Sky, in which he documents his researches in a number of Catholic archives concerning the verified witnessings of flying saints, in astounding and delightful numbers.
Posted by: Barry Ross | February 12, 2005 at 01:36 PM
It's not just you, Jay.
Reynolds continues to sink lower than I imagined was possible. The post by Ascher that he endorses is as disgusting and idiotic as Churchill's remarks, yet he continues, apparently, to be respected by the right blogosphere.
Perhaps one of the conservatives here can provide an explanation other than the highly uncomplimentary one I am thinking of.
Posted by: Bernard Yomtov | February 12, 2005 at 01:57 PM
Mini-survey: does the phrase "Do you know the way to San Jose" mean anything to people here? I got an earful about my ignorance the other day.
Posted by: rilkefan | February 12, 2005 at 01:57 PM
rilkefan,
You deserve an earful. It's a Burt Bachrach song, which was a hit for Dionne Warwick. Great song. Lyrics are the words of someone who went to LA to be a star, and now wants to go home to San Jose.
".. in a week or maybe two they'll make you a star.
But all the stars, who never were, are parking cars
Or pumping gas.."
Posted by: Bernard Yomtov | February 12, 2005 at 02:01 PM
Do you know the way to San Jose -- a song of some sort?
Barry: thanks for the link to St. Christina the Astonishing, who was new to me. Highlights:
About Instapundit et al: I am considering a post, but there's also work etc...
Posted by: hilzoy | February 12, 2005 at 02:03 PM
I sometimes wonder if season 6 of Buffy wasn't in some ways influenced by the life of St. Christina the Astonishing.
Posted by: Andrew Reeves | February 12, 2005 at 02:11 PM
"she would roll in fire and cry out in agony, yet remain un-roasted"
I love "un-roasted".
Posted by: rilkefan | February 12, 2005 at 02:15 PM
That is the cutest post, ever!
(it's like I'm in back the LAUSD school bus with the Gomez Sisters.)
Posted by: NeoDude | February 12, 2005 at 02:46 PM
What, no one mentioned Sally Fields yet?
Posted by: liberal japonicus | February 12, 2005 at 05:24 PM
Barry, thanks for the link. You beat me to it, actually. St. Christina the Astonishing has long been my favorite.
Posted by: Jackmormon | February 12, 2005 at 08:57 PM
Okay, here's a slightly more political (but Catholic-church approved!) version of our flying St. Joseph, hastily translated from La Fleur des Saints:
Born at Copertino (Pouilles) in 1603, died at Osimo (Ancone) the 18 Sept. 1663.
The index of Patronage in this volume says nothing about aviators, but mentions that St. Joseph "comes to the aid of those who must take exams." He's the patron saint of midterms and finals! Awesome!
Posted by: Jackmormon | February 12, 2005 at 09:15 PM
He's the patron saint of midterms and finals!
Given the number of times I've crashed and burned on my finals, this seems appropriate.
Posted by: liberal japonicus | February 12, 2005 at 09:32 PM
Any a semi-related note, anyone ever play the old computer game Darklands?
Also, on an unrelated note, I swore to myself that I'd mention in the next open thread that I finally heard someone use "whoretastic" as a positive adjective yesterday. Even funnier, it was a girl describing herself and the guy she was inviting to her Valentine's Day party.
Posted by: Anarch | February 12, 2005 at 09:53 PM
LJ,
No. That's Icarus you're thinking of. Though I guess he burned and crashed, rather than the other way around.
Posted by: Bernard Yomtov | February 12, 2005 at 10:22 PM
Well, as for me, in my finals, I have generally prayed for the possibility of flight, and I don't think the Catholic church has a saint of time-travel. Praying to Icarus for help on my exams doesn't seem plausible.
At any rate, Icarus is the name of my hard drive, which makes more sense to me, but YMMV.
Posted by: liberal japonicus | February 12, 2005 at 10:43 PM
Man, 29, off to Iraq, saying goodbye to his wife and 11 children.
Posted by: rilkefan | February 13, 2005 at 01:25 AM
rilkefan: I hope Jonah Goldberg is feeling reeeeeaaaaallly lame right about now.
Posted by: Anarch | February 13, 2005 at 01:31 AM
I don't give a fig about how Goldberg feels - I just hope those kids get their father back.
Posted by: rilkefan | February 13, 2005 at 01:40 AM
I don't give a fig about how Goldberg feels - I just hope those kids get their father back.
You're absolutely right. I assumed it went without saying which, in this day and age, is a dangerous assumption.
Posted by: Anarch | February 13, 2005 at 01:49 AM
No snideness intended. Actually I think that this guy is being irresponsible. And that this war puts lots of people in difficult or questionable positions which I feel little moral standing to judge (yet another problem with the whole morality concept).
Posted by: rilkefan | February 13, 2005 at 01:55 AM
rilkefan: why is the fact that you can't answer all questions about morality a problem with morality? (Just asking...) (Especially since, in this case, part of the inability probably stems from insufficient familiarity with the particular case, and morality, for all its charms, never promised to make us omniscient.)
Posted by: hilzoy | February 13, 2005 at 02:06 AM
Because the schanzbets get fungus if you do?
Uhh, maybe I shouldn't make pronouncements about the nature of things I don't think exist, but I was referring to the inability to make moral judgments without moral standing (which sort of makes the whole thing pointless from a practical standpoint), not the can't-answer-all-questions feature, which I know from Goedel is a common failing of stuff I do believe in.
Posted by: rilkefan | February 13, 2005 at 02:14 AM
Perhaps the man feels that if he has 11 children he has even more reason than the rest of us to take steps to protect the country?
Posted by: Sebastian Holsclaw | February 13, 2005 at 02:38 AM
"Praying to Icarus for help on my exams doesn't seem plausible."
You could pray to Ikaros that it should function properly and without abnormal splice variants. Then your leukocytes would be in good working order and keep you healthy while you studied for your exams...Assuming, of course, that genes respond to prayer.
Posted by: Dianne | February 13, 2005 at 10:40 AM
"Icarus is the name of my hard drive"
Talk about tempting fate. Why not "Black Monday" instead?
Posted by: Bernard Yomtov | February 13, 2005 at 12:21 PM
Actually I think that this guy is being irresponsible.
warning -- rant incoming:
I agree. I saw that story on Good Morning America. Couric interviewed the family. (But first, watch the whole family take their first airplane ride! How Cute!)
The story makes me sick. Turn it around -- what if the mother was a trained paramedic and decided that it was her duty to serve and she got called up. Would anyone support that decision? Half their kids are under the age of eight. Did those kids ask to be born? Is it too much of a commitment for BOTH PARENTS to stick around until they are, say, the mature age of twelve or something?
[/rant]
ObDisclosure: I was orphaned at a young age so I may be seeing this through the Lens of Abandonment Issues.
Posted by: votermom | February 14, 2005 at 09:41 AM
"Just knowing the story of Saint Joseph of Cupertino puts both Silicon Valley and petit mal epilepsy in a whole new light. Enjoy."
Petit Mal epilepsy? Why go halfways - go Grand Mal and scare the s**t out of your friends and family when you have a seizure. Cool visions too, if you're lucky.* Mind you, the depletion of neurotransmitters mean you'll come out of it with the close equivalent of a raging hangover and your body (because of the spasms) will feel like God crushed you in his fist, but in terms of theatrics, it's much more effective than some wimpy tempest-in-a-temporal lobe.
*So much so that when I had a relapse of epilepsy after 15-odd years, my primary reaction wasn't shock or fear, but primarily being bummed-out that I had to suffer through the post-ictalic state and all the damn checkups without getting a vivid vision-type experience out of it. Mind you, my wife still refers to the seizure as "demonic possession", so it still had some dramatic impact.
Posted by: Urinated State of America | February 14, 2005 at 06:46 PM
there will be a comic book about joseph of cupertino, drawn by me and hitting the north american market in december. i don't want to spam your blog with any commercial details, so if anyone is interested in purchasing it just mail me and i'll give you the previews order code.
thomas
Posted by: Thomas Nachlik | October 20, 2005 at 02:47 PM