Back when I was in grade school, we had a series of assemblies featuring skits about the Bill of Rights. The one that really stuck in my mind went something like this:
(Knock, knock)
Couple in room: Who's there?
(Voice from outside) The army. We would like to quarter some soldiers in your house.
Couple: No thanks; we don't want to quarter any soldiers just now.
(Voice) You have to. We're the army.
Couple: No we don't. It's peacetime, and the third amendment to the Constitution states that "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner".
(Voice) Oh. You're right. Sorry. (Sound of boots shuffling away.)
Ever since, I've had a soft spot for the third amendment, and I've wondered: has anything in American jurisprudential history ever turned on it? And it occurred to me that with all the lawyers here, someone might know the answer.
Besides, I thought it might make a nice break from Swift Boats and eugenicists.
another question: has the freedom of the press clause of the first amendment ever been held to protect something that the freedom of speech clause didn't?
Posted by: lawgeek | August 06, 2004 at 09:17 PM
my favorite is "Knock, Knock."/"who's there?". The Texas Republican platform under W./ What do you want?/The adopted children of gay people/ the amount of screams at your leisure.
And they won, both the state and the country. And we've had nothing to really worry about, except one little proposed Constitutional Amendment, scores of State Amendments against gay marriage and more kids in foster homes and orphanages due to discrimination of gay parents.
Posted by: wilfred | August 06, 2004 at 10:42 PM
I too would like to hear about cases on quartering, but I have to say, knock-knock jokes seem like a great mnemonic for constitutional protections. Any others out there?
Posted by: meaux | August 06, 2004 at 11:32 PM
"knock-knock jokes seem like a great mnemonic for constitutional protections."
I got one.
"Who's there? Hey, you're supposed to knock! Hey, what about the Fourth Amednm...aaghhgh"
The third amendment is definitely anachronistic. Along with the 20 bucks in the 7th. Hadn't they heard of inflation? Honestly.
Posted by: sidereal | August 07, 2004 at 12:13 AM
I wish I'd learned my amendments with knock knock jokes. Instead, I got numerology. You see, the amendment says "no quartering of soldiers" and a quarter is 1/4 and 4-1=3 so it's the 3rd amendment.
"Two bare arms" was more straightforward.
Posted by: dan | August 07, 2004 at 01:01 AM
Well, this was grade school. -- Actually, they got the first amendment wrong: that skit featured people talking about robbing a bank and being arrested and invoking their right to free speech. That night I told my Dad (a law professor) how I had learned that if you wanted to commit a crime you could actually do all the planning in front of the police, and if memory serves we had a nice conversation about conspiracy laws.
Posted by: hilzoy | August 07, 2004 at 01:10 AM
Knock, knock!
Who's there?
I'm running for President! Vote for me!
Oh, okay.
Knock, knock!
Who's there?
I'm President! Vote for me!
Oh, okay.
Knock, knock!
Who's there?
I'm President! Vote for me!
No.
Why not? Don't you think I've done a good job over the past 8 years?
Yes, but the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution says "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice". So goodbye.
Oh. Goodbye.
(Hey, this is fun, in a really stupid sort of way... a good project for a grade school class, invent skits for each Amendment and play them in front of the class.)
Posted by: Jesurgislac | August 07, 2004 at 04:42 AM
I'd especially like to see the skit that a bunch of grade school kids would come up with for the 25th Amendment... ;-)
Posted by: Jesurgislac | August 07, 2004 at 04:44 AM
I think the 16th and 21st Amendments would be pretty funny too...
Posted by: Anarch | August 07, 2004 at 01:26 PM
hilzoy, for an answer to your question, check this site. Brief highlight:
Posted by: kenB | August 07, 2004 at 01:47 PM
I keep wanting to filk the Bill of Rights to the Twelve days of Christmas, but it just won't scan, dammit. Even if I include the two that didn't make it to begin with. :)
Moe
PS: The Five verse wrote itself, of course: "I... PLEAD... THE... FIFTH!!!!!"
Posted by: Moe Lane | August 07, 2004 at 02:06 PM
kenB: Thanks! That was exactly what I was looking for.
Poor old third amendment: no one pays attention to it. Back when people were identifying themselves as first-amendment liberals and second-amendment conservatives and the like, I used to insist that I was a third-amendment leftist. Oddly enough, no one seemed inclined to join me.
Posted by: hilzoy | August 07, 2004 at 02:31 PM
Hilzoy, I'll join you. ;-) The third amendment is evidently one that everyone can get behind.
PS Curse you, Moe. That's going to run through my head for days now.
*wanders off, humming*
On the fifth day of Christmas, my true love said to me...
Posted by: Jesurgislac | August 08, 2004 at 06:28 AM
"PS Curse you, Moe."
Be grateful that I didn't mention... no. I shall be merciful.
All hail the Third,
Moe
Posted by: Moe Lane | August 08, 2004 at 01:27 PM
_Engblom v. Carey_ is the only Third Amendment case I know of that got up to even the Court of Appeals level.
_Engblom_ had to do with National Guardsmen quartered in the dormitory-style on-site housing of prison guards during a prison strike in New York State. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a lower-court decision that had thrown the prison guards' suit out on summary judgement, but the suit ultimately failed because whether the Third Amendment applied in those circumstances was sufficiently unclear that the defendants were protected by qualified immunity.
Posted by: David | August 08, 2004 at 10:20 PM