Well, the new Iraqi paper al-Mada (whose editor, one Fakhri Karim, comes from a Marxist background and was pro-liberation of Iraq. A year ago I would have said that was a contradiction in terms, but then a year ago I wasn't really aware of SIAW or Norm Geras)... right, the paper in question has apparently amassed quite a list of people and groups with their hands in the oil jar. Is it true?
Well, so far the Washington Times and the UK Independent have both produced articles about it which are non-skeptical in tone. No, that doesn't precisely fill me with confidence, either. The fact that the article's translation comes from MEMRI doesn't really concern me, but people have commented on that site's slant in the past, so I'm noting that I'm aware of the controversy. Then there's the oddities of just how these bribes were supposed to take place: it's not so much the idea of bribing people with millions of barrels of oil that raises an eyebrow as is the difficulty of keeping it all secret. Finally, the list itself - well, here's one example:
"The 8th of October Movement, a Brazilian Communist group, received 4.5 million barrels".
Umm, why?
So, I think some further verification is in order, and I'll save my further comments until such time as it's forthcoming.
Moe
PS: And it would seem Tacitus agrees with me. Well, I've already written this out...
(Via the Instaman and Slings & Arrows)
Is that a million barrels of oil in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?
Ba-dum-bump!
Yeah, this story cries out like a whipperwill: "Wait and see!" "Wait and see!"
Posted by: Gary Farber | January 29, 2004 at 01:49 AM
Well, I have googled "8th of October Movememnt" in English and Portuguese with the number written as text and numerical and gotten no hits. I've never heard of it.
Posted by: Randy Paul | January 29, 2004 at 05:49 PM
I did spell it right. Sorry for the typo.
Posted by: Randy Paul | January 29, 2004 at 05:50 PM
Randy,
Here you go:
"The [Pyongyang Mission of the NDFSK] invited the delegations of the US Workers World Party led by Deirdre Griswold Staff, member of the secretariat of the national committee, the US Socialist Workers Party led by Steven Palmer Clark, member of the political bureau, the October 8th Revolutionary Movement of Brazil led by its secretary general Claudio Campos and Andy Brooks, secretary general of the New Communist Party of Britain and held talks with them in between 22 to 25 April."
Pyongyang!? Axis of... oh, never mind.
Posted by: Jonas Cord | January 29, 2004 at 09:44 PM
Google "MR8 Brasil" or
"Momiviento Revolucionario 8 de Octubre (MR8) Brasil"
Lotsa hits
Posted by: The Commissar | January 30, 2004 at 09:23 AM
Interestingly, I found hits with MR8 Brasil but not with the other one. October by the way is spelled outubro in Portuguese and movement is movimento.
I did find some when I spelled it in Portuguese, but very few of the pages were Portuguese. I've heard of Alnicom, but they are all pretty marginal in Brazil as I understand it.
Tempestade na copa da agua.
Posted by: Randy Paul | January 30, 2004 at 01:44 PM
October 8 Movement is a strong supporter of Lula da Silva, the Marxist president of Brazil. here's a very rough translation of his victory">http://noticias.terra.com.br/eleicoes/interna/0,5625,OI64590-EI380,00.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DMR8%2BBrasil%2BLula%2Bda%2BSilva%2B%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG">victory speech from October 28, 2002, where he thanks them for their support (for some reason, Google translates "Lula" as "squid").
Lula opposed the liberation of Iraq, though Brazil was not a member of the Security Council, and the Brazilians were of limited use for blocking any resolutions authorizing force. However, according to this list, Saddam already had Putin and maybe Chirac for that.
Basically, the Marxists in Brazil just put together some really massive anti-war demonstrations. They were some of the first of the really coordinated rallies, and I have some great pictures of the communist rally, if anyone is interested.
Posted by: Ryan | February 02, 2004 at 11:26 PM
Marxist? Gee, the IMF doesn't seem to think so:
Chile, which was on the UN Security Council at the time of the war also opposed the war and it is the most market friendly government in Latin America.
Lula is defintely a leftist, but a Marxist would not be doing this:
Posted by: Randy Paul | February 03, 2004 at 08:58 PM