Just in from Fox News :
BAGHDAD, Iraq — At least five people were killed in a large explosion that ripped through a restaurant in central Baghdad Wednesday and there were reports that Iraqi police said it may have been caused by a homicide bomber.
This is not an occasion to try to score political points, or to hold a referendum on the War in Iraq. Innocents have died and, regardless of your political views, Iraq has become a battle that we cannot afford to lose. With all those good things in mind, however, I'd like to make an extremely petty point about linguistics of the Fox News report.
As the report shows, it has become fashionable to refer to suicide bombings as "homicide bombings." I understand that some like the term "homicide bombing" because it supposedly dramatizes the fact that innocents have died in the attack, while the term "suicide bombing" would seem to emphasize the death of the perpetrator of the attack. I can see the emotional draw of such a tactic.
Nonetheless, this is idiotic. The reason is fairly simple: All bombings that intentionally kill an innocent or innocents are homicide bombings. The Unibomber, for instance, committed homicide bombings. A suicide bombing, by comparison, is a bombing in which the perpetrator commits the additional sin of killing him- or herself.
Using the term "homicide bombings" in place of "suicide bombings" manages the rare trifecta of being redundant and misleading, while simultaneously minimizing the very crime(s) being committed.
Now, I have little pull with Fox News, but perhaps I can convince our modest readership of the following: Please, friends, it's thinking like this that gets us nonsense like "freedom fries" and "freedom wine" (the latter from "Free-nce," one supposes). Please don't go down this route. Don't use the term "homicide bombing."
And have a safe and happy New Year's eve. My best to all.
Couldn't agree more.
Posted by: poputonian | December 31, 2003 at 04:47 PM
"Please, friends, it's thinking like this that gets us nonsense like 'freedom fries' and 'freedom wine....'"
I just pointed out to Matt Welch the other day that he was visiting the country of Freedom during the holidays. Mmm, Freedom cheese and Freedom wine! Those Freedom folk sure do make some great food.
Posted by: Gary Farber | December 31, 2003 at 05:39 PM
Seems like I'd heard this one on Fox in reference to a bombing in the occupied territories last summer or fall. Must not have caught then, so they're trying it again now.
Not sure which one is quicker to make me lapse into involuntary eye-rolling: "homicide bombers" or Bush's "suiciders."
I suppose at least Fox News isn't trying to make up new words...
Posted by: Balatron | December 31, 2003 at 06:54 PM
I always thought the horror of the term "suicide bomber" was that the bomber was violating two societal taboos at once -- taking his own life and taking the lives of others. Has that horror diminished?
Posted by: Matthew Stinson | December 31, 2003 at 07:11 PM
Yes. Thanks. Ugh.
Posted by: carpeicthus | December 31, 2003 at 08:22 PM
I agree on "homicide bomber." I can't tell from that term if the bomber killed himself, or if I have to worry about him coming back to "homicide bomb" again.
The word "homicide" doesn't make the act sound any more vile. In fact, a homicide is not necessarily a crime at all. Homicide is the taking of a human life, which can happen in self-defense, in war, in capital punishment, accidentally, and criminally, too.
I've got issues with the whole thing. Heck, I've got issues with the word "issues."
Posted by: Frank Warner | December 31, 2003 at 09:15 PM
A suicide bombing, by comparison, is a bombing in which the perpetrator commits the additional sin of killing him- or herself.
"Additional sin?" That's not a bug -- it's a feature! Would that all murderers would kill themselves in the act as well.
Posted by: Phil | January 01, 2004 at 04:57 PM
Phil,
The wrinkle about suicide bombers is that since they've already decided to destroy themselves, the fact that there is a latent threat by the police or military or whatever to kill you if you try to blow someone up no longer holds any deterring influence.
Posted by: Jonas Cord | January 01, 2004 at 08:26 PM
Well, I suppose there's something to be said for a term that points out that a crime that usually ends the lives of one or more innocent people also does a public service by removing a useless waste of protoplasm from the gene pool; however, there might also be something to be said for denying said waste any recognition for their despicable and cowardly act. YMMV.
Posted by: M. Scott Eiland | January 02, 2004 at 05:18 AM
"Additional sin?"
Yes, it is still a sin to kill oneself. The thinking behind it being that only God can give and take life.
however, there might also be something to be said for denying said waste any recognition for their despicable and cowardly act.
I don't know how you give the "waste" recognition by noting that he or she died in the attack. That's being accurate, not laudatory.
Posted by: von | January 02, 2004 at 07:11 AM
Not sure how describe it, but the bombing at the Iraqi restaurant should include the words suicide, terrorist, attack, bombing (STAB). Or maybe Suicide Terrorist Attack By Bombing (STABB). If soldiers are specifically targeted, then maybe it's Suicide Guerilla Attack by Bombing (SGABB).
Posted by: Bird Dog | January 02, 2004 at 08:08 PM
The thing is, people know exactly what you mean when you say "suicide bombing." They don't think it's an act of protest where no innocents were harmed, like a hunger strike or Jan Palach or something; they know it's quite the opposite. It's a commonly accepted, relatively neutral way of conveying useful information. You could find fault with it, but you could find fault with most political terms.
"Homicide bombing" is a misguided use of language to make a political point, which obscures more than it illuminates.
You can always disagree with the names we give things. IIRC some of our leading Holocaust scholars aren't so crazy about calling it the "Holocaust"--I think it was Elie Wiesel who preferred "Shoah". And I have a personal pet peeve about referring to the former World Trade Center as "Ground Zero" and to "nine eleven" rather than "September eleventh" and I don't do it myself. But those are the words the world has given it and at a certain point it's better to accept that than argue over it.
Posted by: Katherine | January 03, 2004 at 12:47 AM
Totally with you on the entire post, von. Good stuff. Especially: "regardless of your political views, Iraq has become a battle that we cannot afford to lose".
Posted by: James Casey | January 03, 2004 at 05:10 AM
Or maybe a whole other set of words, like orcs and urukai.
Posted by: Bird Dog | January 03, 2004 at 12:21 PM