by hilzoy
It's hard to convey how depressing it is to return from ten days away and find that the Big Story in politics involves tire gauges. So let's march through the facts. Obama said this a few days ago:
"There are things you can do individually, though, to save energy. Making sure your tires are properly inflated -- simple thing -- but we could save all the oil that they're talking about getting off drilling, if everybody was just inflating their tires and getting regular tune-ups. You could actually save just as much."
To which McCain replied:
"“He suggested we put air in our tires to save on gas,” Mr. McCain said. “My friends, let’s do that, but do you think that’s enough to break our dependence on Middle Eastern oil? I don’t think so."
I don't think inflating your tires is enough to break our dependence on Middle Eastern oil either. And if Obama had said that it was, I'd be right out there criticizing him. But that's not what he said at all. Likewise, if inflating tires was in fact the whole of Obama's Energy Plan, he'd be nuts. But it isn't, any more than it's true that "Senator Obama's solution to high gas prices is telling Americans to make sure their tires are inflated." And saying that Obama "thinks we can inflate our way out of [a supply crisis]", or that "properly inflated tires will almost completely solve our automobile energy crisis", does not make it so.
So: is it true that we can save as much oil by inflating our tires and getting regular tuneups as "they're talking about getting off drilling"? Yes. I assume that Obama is comparing the oil saved by inflating tires and getting tuneups to the amount of oil we could get by drilling offshore in currently restricted areas. I haven't been able to find a transcript or a video of the context of his remarks (if anyone can find one, let me know), but it seems logical to assume that the "they" who are "talking about getting" oil from drilling are the McCain campaign, and that Obama is referring to the proposal McCain has been hammering at every opportunity.
ABC's Jake Tapper has consulted the Director of CSIS, who estimates that inflating tires and getting tuneups could save around 800,000 barrels of oil a day. For some reason, he compares this to current output from offshore drilling, not to the projected gains from lifting restrictions on offshore drilling. Luckily, the government's Energy Information Administration has estimates on the effects of lifting those restrictions: it would raise domestic oil production by 1.6% over the years 2012-2030, and by 3% in 2030. Doing the math using their figures, the highest level of additional oil that lifting offshore drilling would produce would be a little over 200,000 barrels per day (in 2025-2028.)
Last time I checked, 800,000 was greater than 200,000. Moreover, we could achieve those gains now, while lifting the limits on offshore drilling wouldn't produce any new oil for a decade.
***
McCain could not have made an issue out of this without misrepresenting Obama's position and saying that he thinks that inflating your tires, all by itself, will solve the problem of high gas prices, or eliminate our dependence on foreign oil. Had he stuck to what Obama said, he would have been in the ludicrous position of criticizing a pretty anodyne suggestion about energy conservation, and one that all sorts of people besides Obama have made. So he chose to lie.
When politicians lie about what their opponents say, they degrade our democracy and disrespect voters. If they were to represent their opponents accurately -- if we knew that while they might not present all the arguments in favor of their opponents' positions, they would not lie about them -- then we could simply listen to both candidates and make up our minds on the merits. A candidate who lies about his opponent's position is not willing to let us do that. Instead, he puts us in the position of having to go prowling around on the web if we want to have any idea whether or not what he says is true.
When the McCain campaign says that "Senator Obama's solution to high gas prices is telling Americans to make sure their tires are inflated", and when McCain himself suggests that Obama thinks that inflating tires is "enough to break our dependence on Middle Eastern oil", it's as though they were saying: we are going to adopt a strategy that will force you, the voters, to spend hours of your lives checking each and every one of our statements for accuracy. We have no respect for the value of your time. Nor do we respect your intellect or your civic engagement: if we did, we wouldn't adopt a strategy that can only work if voters are too apathetic to notice that what we're saying is false. If you don't like it -- if you have better things to do with your lives than to fact-check our every utterance -- then that's just too bad.
It's a curious strategy for someone who claims to put country first, and to care about honor.
"In light of that assessment, I'm really confused as to what point you're trying to make."
I'm not trying to make any point; I answered Slarti's question. If I wanted to write something else, I'd, you know, do so.
Posted by: Gary Farber | August 08, 2008 at 09:47 AM
I'm not trying to make any point; I answered Slarti's question. If I wanted to write something else, I'd, you know, do so.
Um, OK. In that case, your answer to Slarti's question makes no sense and confuses me mightily.
Now, if you wrote your answer after having forgotten that most of the oil this country uses is imported by tanker, that's all well and good. But otherwise, it doesn't really make any sense.
Posted by: Turbulence | August 08, 2008 at 09:59 AM
And not for nothing, but in my very humble opinion the reason offshore drilling has become the Most Important Issue Of Our Day is summarized perfectly right here.
Not saying there's no reason to consider and debate it, not saying it is without merit.
But none of the actually sane reasons for considering it appear to be on the table right now.
Thanks -
Posted by: russell | August 08, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Russell, I have a Republican co-worker who I have known for the last five years, a decent enough guy when he's not wearing his know-it-all persona, just turned 30.
We can't have a single political discussion without me just giving up after a minute or two and wanting to bang my head up against a wall.
Eric's current course of action is to say the Democratic Congress, not George Bush, is the why things are the way they are.
Watch Krugman on TV, and he usually gets shouted down by whichever Republican is on opposite him. Same thing.
Posted by: bedtimeforbonzo | August 08, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Slartibartfast: PIMF, I guess.
??? Translation, please?
Posted by: Nell | August 08, 2008 at 11:13 AM
Preview Is My Friend
Posted by: Phil | August 08, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Thanks, Phil.
Posted by: Nell | August 08, 2008 at 11:42 AM
Ha ha, I googled PIMF and saw "Please ignore my f***-up." Somehow it didn't seem to fit Slarti's context, but I didn't have time to explore further. Thanks, Phil. ;)
Posted by: JanieM | August 08, 2008 at 11:43 AM
We can't have a single political discussion without me just giving up after a minute or two and wanting to bang my head up against a wall.
To be honest, outside of here, I don't talk politics, or really any kind of social policy, with anyone. My wife, one or two friends, that's about it. It's just too frustrating, and I just get too pissed off.
I'm buying a sandwich the other day, and there's a sign in the cafeteria explaining how their tomatoes are safe to eat. This was just after about 1,000 folks had gotten sick from tainted peppers, and folks thought it was the tomatoes.
A guy walks up, apropos of nothing, and says, "See, the tomatoes are safe. The whole thing was about nothing. They're just scaring everyone, and all for nothing."
Don't know why he thought it was necessary to bring this up with total strangers in a lunch line, but there you have it.
I began to offer the point that, in fact, a lot of people had actually gotten sick. Then I realized what I was about to wade into, and just walked away.
It's just not worth it. I do what I can to make sure folks like that get outvoted, but beyond that I just don't have the energy to argue about stuff like that anymore.
It just seems like some weird form of insanity to me. Crazy people will drain the juice out of you in a minute flat.
No offense intended to anyone here. Folks here don't tend to be like that.
Thanks -
Posted by: russell | August 08, 2008 at 12:19 PM