My Photo

« Bedfellowing with Nancy | Main | Retract Or Resign »

June 23, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515c2369e200d83424647b53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Condi Rising:

» Carnival of The Chillin #2 from The Strata-Sphere
I did not receive very many responses for inputs to this Carnival - so I went hunting for them! Also, last time out I focused solely on issues on judicial appointment, ect. So the 2nd part of this Carnival shows off posts from Coalition of The Chil... [Read More]

Comments

my gut still tells me that Rice's chances for 2008 are good

my gut tells me Ed Klein will have to write a book about her sexual ambiguities.

frankly, i doubt Rice's big words will make a whit of difference. she certainly can't enforce them herself - that has to come from her boss. and, well...

Rice in 2008? Er, no. She has no legislative or governing experience and her "image appeal" is to a group that the Republican party isn't terribly concerned with or likely to win. She has never run for office, which in itself virtually guarantees that she will lose (inexperienced politicians never win their first campaign for any important office). She does nothing for the Christian Right (not one of them, not even married). Other candidates are already locking down support, and the Bush machine will swing behind Jeb.

House or Senate, maybe. Remotely possible as a VP candidate, except that I can't think of a Presidential candidate who really needs her.

i doubt Rice's big words will make a whit of difference

Odd...it looks like her words are in the same font as yours. Maybe I'm missing something, though.

my gut still tells me that Rice's chances for 2008 are good

My gut tells me that you have a better chance of getting all Republicans Senators to come out on the record against lynching.

Odd...it looks like her words are in the same font as yours. Maybe I'm missing something, though.

i was measuring horizontally.

kerning looks about the same, too.

Reagan's references to the Soviet Union as an "evil empire"--or when he said "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down these walls"--weren't exactly the soothing words of a State Department pinstriper, but they changed the world and they changed conventional wisdoms.

These statements are debatable at the very least. I don't know where you were in the 1980s, but the idea that the content of either utterance was in any way in conflict with conventional wisdom is simply laughable. What was contrary to conventional wisdom was that these utterances would move the ball downfield. My interpretation of the 1980s is that the conventional wisdom was right, that RR showed he understood this in the second term, that that his primary contribution to the eventual liberation of Eastern Europe thereafter was not screwing things up so badly that his much abler successor couldn't work out -- with very able allies on both sides of the divide -- the soft landing that RR could probably not have gotten.

I think she's damaged goods becuase of the August 6th Presidential breifing. She looked so very dishonest in that monent during the 911 comission hearings, I think that's going to come back to bite her on the butt if she ever runs for high office.

kerning looks about the same, too

that would matter if we each used the same number of the same letters in our respective sentences.

but i'm puzzled: have my words always been the standard by which others are measured ? or, is this a new thing? maybe Notes is down hasn't delivered the notification email yet ?

Agence France Presse

Didn't you get the memo? It's now Agence Liberte Presse.

How exactly did the Worst.National.Security.Adviser.Ever. become such a darling? Very mysterious.

And for Charles to think Clarke "slippery" but extol Rice is just weird, weird, weird. Did we watch different 9/11 hearings? I saw the one with the completely clueless lady.

And no one has mentioned the D word yet. The Sec of State's inability to get anything good done in Sudan, indeed, what seems to be http://coalitionfordarfur.blogspot.com/2005/06/us-opposes-western-troops-in-darfur.html>backtracking, might not look all that good.

Every half-way decent person associated with this administration quit years ago. See Christine Todd Whitman, for example. Those who stayed are lowlife by definition. Condi-Bin-Laden-Determined-to-Attack-Inside-the-United-States-Rice is one of the lowest.

I'm not seeing the same efforts that you are in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Uzbekistan. It's almost as if President Bush told these leaders that she was there for window dressing and that they were free to repress their people, particularly their women, as long as they liked. We would be far better off if we had no diplomatic relations with any of those three countries, and I don't see how we have helped the citizens of those countries in any way.

Bush listens to Bandar, not Condi, on Saudi Arabia. The real work on Iraq reconstruction will be done at the upcoming donors conference, and Condi and State have done exactly nothing that would appeal to the confidence of other nations in helping with Iraq. Specifically, reconstruction planning and expenditure needs to be audited and placed under international oversight through the UN. No movement by Condi there. Bush listens to Cheney on Pakistan and is not going to let Condi push Musharaff there. Reformers in Egypt and Iran are better served by State and Condi butting the heck out than by tainting them with endorsements. Foreign policy in this administration is run out of OVP. Condi is a sideshow.

Let us not forget the aluminum tubes. But tell you what: If Republicans nominate her, I'll seriously consider her. Of course, the fact I think she's a liar will hurt her chances with me.

She is the ultimate academic and bureaucrat, which is hardly qualifications for much of anything except tenure. Her record as National Security Advisor was horrible, mostly because she provided zero leadership in coordinating national security which was her most important function. She clearly lies when it suits her, like any sniveling academic or bureaucrat.

My favorite bone-head moment (there are so many) is her stupidly uttering that no one had conceived of flying planes into buildings as a terror technique, except that they had and had provided her with the memo (which she either did not read, forgot about, or chose to ignore when making her remark).

You have to be clueless to think she has any chance in 2008, especially in this Republican party. She has thrived because she is the perfect Bush confidante -- she whispers into his ear what he wants to hear and never crosses him in public or in private. She is the ultimate sycophant.

But dm, in a world where John "Sabotage-the-Policy" Bolton is worthy of all the blood sweat and tears being spent for him appointment, CR's willingness to at least try to execute the policy makes her a real star. That's what I get from CB, anyway.

What policy? All the substantive policy action is coming from the Cheney faction, and Condi is just cover, like she always has been. Stiffing Blair on global warming, stonewalling the Senate on the Bolton nomination, muddling through on Iraq, Iran, and North Korea, all these are products of the Dick Cheney policy shop. Condi has nothing to show for policy.

dmbeaster:
"She is the ultimate academic and bureaucrat, which is hardly qualifications for much of anything except tenure. Her record as National Security Advisor was horrible, mostly because she provided zero leadership in coordinating national security which was her most important function. She clearly lies when it suits her, like any sniveling academic or bureaucrat. "

Didn't she make a comment during the 9/11 commission hearings that there was nobody to coordinate the intelligence, or something like that? If the National Security Advisor doesn't have that as part of their responsibility, who does?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Whatnot


  • visitors since 3/2/2004

March 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Blog powered by Typepad

QuantCast