by Doctor Science
I gave up trying to read the Rabid Puppy nominations in the Hugo Awards story and (hawk, spit) Related Works categories, and went over to look at the two art categories: Best Professional Artist, and Best Fan Artist.
We Hugo voters get a packet of representative works from each artist, supposedly. The Worldcon Constitution states that:
In the Best Professional Artist category, the acceptance should include citations of at least three (3) works first published in the eligible year-- and images or links are normally part of the packet.
As I used Windows Explorer to scan through the Artist packets, I noticed that a number of the images had surprising time-stamps:
This is "Neverborn", in Nick Greenwood's packet -- but the "Date taken" (because Windows assumes you're managing photos) is 2008. Greenwood is a Sad/Rabid Puppy nominee.
I'm cutting here for Hugo Awards Inside-Baseball, and many images.